I need help!

Below is a letter I received from my brother. He needs direction as to the next step.

RE: U.S. District Court Cause 03 CR 0175

“I am a sovereign being detained in the federal detention center in Chicago, Illinois. I have Accepted For Value the courts case, and have discharged the liability of the strawman pursuant to HJR 192 via Bill of Exchange written against the TDA that was established when the certificate of birth was redeemed. However, the tyrannical justice the matter is before has (is) completely ignoring the validity of my non-corporate existence, and the fact that I am Holder in Due Course of the courts case. As the Third Party Intervener I’ve demanded that he produce the claim to which would give him subject matter jurisdiction, and at each state that I approach this line of questioning he has the U.S. Marshal’s remove me from the courtroom, under the auspices that I am being disruptive.

I have filed a Habeas Corpus, which was denied for no valid reasoning and a Writ of Mandamus, which was denied for some abstract rationale.

On February 16th, 2005, he allegedly conducted a sentencing hearing to which I was excluded from witnessing, and prevented from verifying where there was a legitimate claim before the court. According to the transcripts of that proceeding he sentenced the strawman (Defendant) to a term of 115 months to be served in the Bureau of Prisons. However, there has been no entry of judgment on the docket nor has there been a written ORDER or OPINION defining why the judgment has been deferred or what took place at the proceeding.

I am still being detained and need guidance or reference as to my next court of action to which I may obtain relief. I’ve filed Criminal Complaints into the case itself as well as filed them with the U.S. Attorney’s Office, which would prevent the justice from claiming he was operating out of good faith and the record reflects that there was (is) not a legitimate claim before the court.

Please direct or provide me reference to the appropriate remedy from this unlawful restraint. Title 42 material as well as Title 46 applications for a suit in Admiralty Act under section 742 and 781. Also please send me the publication “WRIT RAP” and any other material I might reference to obtain relief or assistance. Thank you in advance and May God be with you for the work you’ve been providing for those wanting freedom.”

ANTHONY SINGLETON Reg #94408-024
Metropolitan Correction Center
71 West Van Buren Street
Chicago, IL 60605

[weishaupt1776]

The only other remedy I know of is dealing w/the bonds and an IBOE.

The unfortunate part is that no one knows how to do it w/o getting in trouble.

I could provide the links & attachments, but I don't know how to use the stuff & wouldn't want to be the one responsible for leading you down the wrong path.

Hopefully KGodd or Wargames will check this thread out

Jean Keating could help you out, though.He claims to have discharged the bonds via International BOE
http://www.paragonliquidations.com/L...DSERVICES.html

[Jerseee]

Yolanda,

Welcome to the forum! Sorry to hear this news but maybe this will help:

http://forum.suijuris.net/showthread.php?t=141

They need jurisdiction to do what they are doing--was subject matter jurisdiction established?

Judgements can be voided also.

good luck

[BOBT12]

I am sad to see what is happening to your brother. It seems that the above responders have given you great advice.

It is hard to stand your ground in these corrupt times, I hope he keeps up the good work.

It is not clear how and if your brother lost personal and/or subject jurisdiction, maybe we can get more on these issues at a later time. Although it certainly appears that the judge assumed personal jurisdiction, was a reason given?

In any case it certainly seems that the judge is issuing a void decision. From what I understand (which is not that much) one of the judges “dirty tricks” is to wait until the time period for lawfully ruling on the case expires, then rule on the case anyway, so that it will be a void judgment. Few will understand the void nature of the decision, thus never challenge it. However, if it is challenged the judge can then hide behind the void nature of the judgment and avoid a claim of false imprisonment. (what a con game)!

Please see the work of Richard Luke Cornforth’s “Secrets of the Legal Industry” for more information. Another benefit is that his work contains sample forms and pleadings to aid someone proceeding sui juris/pro se.

http://www.mylegalsecrets.com/NA/SEC...details .html

or perhaps,

http://www.voidjudgements.net/

Check out:

“People Before Lawyers Putting the rights of citizens ahead of the profits of lawyers”

http://www.perkel.com/pbl/index.htm

May the force be with you!!!

-Bobt12

P.S. I think that it was good, but tough, idea to make the criminal complaints, how is that going?

[Livefire]

Iam a complete neophte when it comes to criminal law, but I have read that the accused has a right to allocution before sentence is passed. That is where one can say their peace before sentence is passed. You have to demand it tho. Worth checking into because I have heard that is also cause to void a judgement.

What are the charge(s)?

Someone above mentioned criminal, but I doubt it.

the problem you have is the judge didnt allow you to not consent to the sentence by doing it without you present. you need to have several of your family members and yourself file notices of non consent to the sentence (judgment) and demand to be released from your kidnapping. its the only way at this point. dont argue the merits of the habeas corpus, the bill of exchange or any of that stuff. the money obligation your strawman is gone, but the judges are obeying the truth in sentencing act which the creditors made them pass into "law". judges or scared to cut off the bond money now. the corporations (so called creditors) who are buying these judgments want you in jail for the full length of the bond. look, they just passed the bankruptcy law too, so, they are enslaving people even more now. Ok, the pocket judgment was extinguished with the bill of exchange. ( i wouldve used a bond instead), but anyway, that debt is gone, so, the bailiff or whoever is holding the order is not releasing it, so , in your notice of non consent, add language that the judge, the baliff in your case and the district attorney, agents and prinicpals, are being true billed for everyday you are kidnapped at this point. put in in their with your dollar value. the key to all this is having witnesses. ive thought about this the last couple of days and thats another piece to the puzzle of them hiding stuff. have at least two witnesses sign on to everything. the main thing, tell them you dont consent to the sentence and have the witnesses sign on to that as witnesses. dont argue subject matter, it dont MATTER, the only matter is the contract you consented to by non response (the sentence). lastly, your family members need to go after their equity, (stuff) after invoicing them. give them 10 days to pay up and when they dont invoice them. people, ive said this over and over, if you dont go after their equity, they dont care what they do to you. you gotta have guts to defend yourself, and you need outside help. its the only way. establish the true bill and go after payment. its the only way. forget title 42 ,title 46 all that crap. they aint gonna punish themselves and let the cat out the bag for all the kidnapping thats going on. Jerseee knows that my eyes were opened a few years ago when i was kidnapped and my mother filed a writ of habeas corpus. she used the power of these words " im a mother defending her child" and i was out in 10 days. she told them people she didnt consent to them holding her property and they released me folks. this stuff is real. stop letting them do it to you. one more thing, use the word kidnapping, make sure they know that you know what they are doing. the strawman was arrested, the real man was kidnapped. arrest is a commercial term. kidnapped is the common law claim. peeace

...that important?

Fraudulent is it?

[Livefire]

Kgodd,

I have a question, would the allocution be the opportunity the "accused" has to accept or reject the court's offer (sentence)? If that opportunity was denied this gentleman, then the judgement is null and void because it is a unilateral contract which is of course unconsciale! I appreciate a LOT of your posts.

correct, the sentencing hearing is when he could have done the allocution. thats exactly why all federal courts use secret indictments, so that you cant have the chance for allocution. see, the guy let them know he had a little knowledge, so, they went into their bag of tricks and sentenced him in secret.so, they denied him the chance to reject the contract offer (sentence). so, now, he must do the allocution from jail along with his family members. its sooo easy to go off and let them know how much knowledge you have about the fraud, but the fraud isnt the issue at this point because when dealing with fictions of law, fraud is accepted. yes its fraud,but since when does fraud mean anything to them? you have to tell them you dont consent to the sentence. what im saying is, thats the only issue. everything else is argument. the ONLY thing you wanna do in any court situation is bond the case and a power of attorney. you can do that by writing you own bond or bringing in the word of Christ as your bond. Didnt he die for all our debts? Yes he did. so, you are already bonded. I keep telling folks this is about the devil, got nothing to do with your guilt or innocence. You bring the bond in to kill the commercial controversy and tell them the debt is discharged AFTER they prove up their claim. (they have none). so, now the money issue is gone, so the strawman is free, finish is off with the allocution. Yolanda , i feel you, but everything is sidetracking your brother right now. this is all simple, dont make it hard because when you start submitting mounds of paperwork, you are telling them you dont trust what you know. peeace