Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 - Page 2

#11 03-17-2004, 11:57 AM

http://www.suijuris.net/main/suijuri...;showtopic=608

There it is. Got our first 'puter in '98. Young chap said, "It's all just point and click." Too much fun.

We'll make a deal. I'll do the "point and click." You do the "real" work and get us all out of this mess!

Randy

#12 03-17-2004, 12:19 PM

What mess?

Should we discuss in private?

Thanks & Kindest regards...

#13 03-17-2004, 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wargames102

Should we discuss in private?

sent you an email. Thanks.

Randy

#14 03-18-2004, 08:15 AM

This must not be a very popular subject, not to many [p]eople chiming in for discussion?

suijuris · #15 03-18-2004, 08:36 AM

I am watching it like a hawk, waiting for the verdict!

Sui Juris

Ice · #16 03-18-2004, 11:53 AM

Pay attention... it will get very interesting when it is all pulled together.

&

#17 03-18-2004, 12:02 PM

ditto suijuris & ice...

jon

Jerseee · #18 03-19-2004, 02:18 AM

I think I have seen enough of this bull.

I'm sticking to adjudicated case law to fight this one--if I ever need to. They are a foreign and that's that. I will not give up jurisdiction simply because they want to write something that is supposed to compel one to their code. they are not above the Constitution and the issue is not up for debate or disucssion. It appears that they are trying to set precedence so that the old adjudicated cases are null. Bulls hit.

Precedence. Nothing more.

#19 03-19-2004, 02:39 AM

Well now... thank you Jerseee for your thoughtful insight and agreement that "they are a foreign".

I think that so far my thread was leading to this self evident point. Now because you couldn't sit still and let me finish up and attempt to get to the punch (finish) line, you have disrupted and cause delay to the others who have been so kind!

You see Jerseee, there is so much adjudicated case law on this practical application, and&that is why it is taking me so long to go through and get this material up without having so much "bull" because I too have seen so much bull that I simply can't stands no more...!

Now that you have clouded my thread with your garbage I simply decide that you are too many extra added bytes for the&limit that I set for this goal of reaching others. Therefore you have cost the others valuable time...

Happy trails...

p.s. this is exactly why&we decided&to make it a pay only site with this material because of the crap that we have to put up with with the likes of Jerseee!

Jerseee · #20 03-19-2004, 04:28 AM

Wargames,

My thought was toward their code. Not towards you. I suggest that if you want to pay to be insulted on a pay as you go website, then by all means you are free to do just that. However, my thoughts were not directed towards you. In fact you were not even mentioned in my post.

You have the right to your opinion just as I have to mine. I am allowed to vent every now and then when I see crap that the system is trying to pull. I have the right to voice my dissatification about codes and policies. In fact, I am one of the more tolerant members on this forum.

Now if you have a hand in developing these codes and publishing them--then I can see why you would respond as such. But just because of my opinions--you want to persecute the forum and withhold your 'precious' research? Hmmm, how sovereign is that? How logical is that?

It costs nothing to gather free information and to even mention paying for something that we provide for free--is ridiculous. I share my information and knowledge freely--and only ask that the next man do the same. The very thought of paying for this is outragious. Moreover, it appears you have gathered some of your information from this very site! If I don't know something, I refer and defer to a higher authority.

I put no one here under duress orsuspense. I withhold no information. I support each member in their efforts, regardless if I agree or not. And there is not one mention of cost for my assistance. I did not ridicule your process. I despise the code--that is it. I keep things in focus as much as I can and charge nothing for it.

But since you want to attack Jerseee--show us proof that your process works. It is only fair to pay for something that is proven. therefore, I accept your offer to pay for the information you complied for free, upon proof that it is effective and I want a guarantee that it will solve my problem. this is not too much to ask for since I am willing to pay. You have been studying for 12 years so I can assume that you have this proof. Has it worked for you yet? Do you have documented proof of your success? What is the cost financially and personally for your documents? Is there a fail safe mechanism in place? Will you provide support after one purchases your product?

Nevertheless, I voiced my opinion and I will be more than gracious to leave your thread. If I have infected any member of their thought process--my apologies.

On that note, I think it is time that I take a sabatical from the forum. I do not wish to disrupt wargames or anyone else's "chi". This decision is not based on this post or wargames' post. this is a decision I have been thinking of for about a week.

So I will answer any questions in another thread if anyone has any for me--but, I need a break to take care of myself.

Once again, my apologies to this tread and if I had affected someone's thought process--I just do not absorb bull**** codes, statutes and unproven processes very well.