Court Discuss the tactics used by the court system, and how to develop your counter-tactics for success in the courtroom, dealing with citations, criminal and civil matters.


Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > Court
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 05-12-2005, 10:23 AM
David Merrill's Avatar
David Merrill David Merrill is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,326
Oaths as Utility Transceivers

Occasionally on the Patriot landscape we find people talking about oaths of office and how they can be utilized to either get honest behavior out of public officials or in the alternative to oust them or even punish them criminally for malfeasance and sometimes even misprision of treason. But never have I really seen any of these folks managing the concept in reality effectively. So I would like to take a moment to explain how to utilize the oath process as testimony and a transceiver utility.

The mechanics works the best if you can find an oath of office for the particular individual in question. Somewhere in the past. An oath that testifies the person knows the state and federal constitution. Then compare this information with the constitutions. The federal constitution only goes specifically into the oath of office of the President so get a searchable (.pdf) constitution for your local state from the Secretary of State website.

We will use the State of Colorado. http://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/elec...2001_const.pdf

In late 1996 the district attorney for the Fourth Judicial District in the State of Colorado John Suthers was pestering me about drawing on a letter of credit with Public Office Money Certificates. Suthers had been district attorney for close to two four-year terms. There was a case going in the State district court* and the day I filed a certificate of fact that John Suthers had never filed his oath of office with Virginia Buckley, then the Secretary of State was the last day that John Suthers worked as (if) district attorney. He only had about six weeks left so the News was after him for an explanation which never came forth. The Certificate of Fact was accompanied by his oath of office which he had filed with the local county clerk and recorder.

That is basically the mechanics. It is far better to have John Suthers' testimony than hearsay. So his locally filed oath expresses that John Suthers is quite responsible to have read and understood the State of Colorado constitution prior to accepting his commission to office.


"Article XII Officers.


Section 9. Oaths - where filed. Officers of the executive department and judges of the supreme and district courts, and district attorneys, shall file their oaths of office with the secretary of state; every other officer shall file his oath of office with the county clerk of the county wherein he shall have been elected.

Section 10. Refusal to qualify - vacancy. If any person elected or appointed to any office shall refuse or neglect to qualify therein within the time prescribed by law, such office shall be deemed vacant."



People either do not understand the concept of fidelity or they just plain do not care. John Suthers is attorney general for the State of Colorado since Ken Salazar got into Washington. Even if he ran a vacant office for nearly eight years.

When John abruptly left office, he basically elected his replacement Jeanne Smith by leaving her in charge of things. Several months later James Harlan AYERS, a friend of mine (now deceased) went to the Secretary of State's office and requested a Certificate of Search on Jeanne Smith. At ninety years old it surprised me that he was treated like a criminal or terrorist. But Jim stood his ground and they let him pay for the Certificate but told him it might take a couple weeks to arrive in the mail. Two weeks later it arrived and was dated a week after his Denver visit.

Two things to note about the quote above from the State constitution. 1) It does not specify the attorney general. And 2) there is no specification on the time period "...prescribed by law,". John Suthers the attorney general is the embodiment, the general address of all the district attorneys. So it just follows logically that he must file his oath with the secretary of state on the same constitutional principle with the district attorneys. The lawfully prescribed timeframe for such matters is thirty (30) days. After thirty days running office without filing with the secretary of state, the office is deemed vacant.

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...and_Decree.rtf

The suitor's name has been altered for his privacy. The fellow is very busy and finally got around to tracking these oaths yesterday. The Secretary of State's office deputies told him they will no longer provide Certificates of Fact for oaths or anything that they do not have on file. There have been terrible complaints. Well, he went back today and got Certificates on both district attorneys and as of today was able to get one on the attorney general as well. They called him yesterday after he left and informed him that John Suthers had faxed over (someone gave him a heads-up about the inquiry) his oath but they could only give him a copy (not certified) since it was only a fax. Today John went over and got it properly filed, even pestering chief justice Mary J. Mullarkey for her signature. Too little too late. Take a look at the last paragraph of the Order and Decree. Also it has been well over thirty days since John took his seat in office - the office of attorney general is now deemed vacant in any court of competent jurisdiction in light of the State of Colorado constitution.

http://friends-n-family-research.info/FFR/Merrill_John_Suthers'_AG_oath.jpg

Regards,

David Merrill.


* Court of record. This is why you should get your local constitution searchable .pdf. Look for "court of record" and "courts of record":



"DISTRICT COURTS


Section 9. District courts - jurisdiction. (1) The district courts shall be trial courts of record with general jurisdiction, and shall have original jurisdiction in all civil, probate, and criminal cases, except as otherwise provided herein, and shall have such appellate jurisdiction as may be prescribed by law."

Last edited by suijuris : 05-12-2005 at 12:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-12-2005, 01:44 PM
truth
 
Posts: n/a
Oaths as Utility Transceivers

Greetings David Merrill,

I have been following some of your threads from ecclesia for some time now. Welcome to the site. This particular post will be quite useful for comprehending how the process works. Thank you.

Sincerely,
truth
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-12-2005, 02:30 PM
ProudHillbilly
 
Posts: n/a
Question

This is fascinating!

Is there a similar process that can be invoked for Federal judges? How would that work?

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-12-2005, 03:55 PM
kgod999
 
Posts: n/a
oaths

hard to follow this thread. is david saying that if a district attorney has a oath on file in the county but not with the secretary of state within 30 days, then the office is still vacant? and where would you find the time frame for georgia?

Last edited by kgod999 : 05-12-2005 at 03:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-12-2005, 04:20 PM
Eureka
 
Posts: n/a
Greetings Mr. Merril!

I have followed your threads in Ecclesia with true delight.

I am very happy to be able to welcome you here at our Suijuris.net home.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-12-2005, 07:21 PM
RickA's Avatar
RickA RickA is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 491
Hello David Merrill. Welcome to suijuris.net.
I too have been reading your threads, along with manuel, from ecclesia.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-12-2005, 10:09 PM
David Merrill's Avatar
David Merrill David Merrill is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,326
grand juries

Thank you all;


What I would really like to see is the proper formation of a grand jury. Without the scope of the attorney general, district attorneys and US attorneys. I am sure that people have that right and attorneys are simply utilizing the process that is there for everyone.

http://www.rangeguide.net/gjmemo.htm

The timeframe for the State of Georgia I am certain is lawfully thirty (30) days. That is a general principal of law. However if Suthers were to contend (backed by chief justice Mary J. Mullarkey) that his office is validated then the suitor would of course have a foundation to demand his probable cause hearing. So it works out either way.

I am also sure there is some kind of oath process for federal judges but that is not the same thing I am talking about here. John Suthers testified against himself by taking an oath to uphold the State of Colorado constitution (any position, any time in the recent past). Therefore he can be held to the constitutional stipulation about validating or vacating his office. That is why when the suitor inquired, he faxed and then properly filed his oath within twenty-four hours.

He is such a METROcrat. He somehow feels he has the luxury of not being accountable. That is the function of the oath - fidelity to the principles. But he just wants to do whatever he pleases. Well, this information in the right hands makes officers in public trust accountable.


Regards,

David Merrill.

Last edited by David Merrill : 05-12-2005 at 10:16 PM. Reason: add link
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-12-2005, 11:28 PM
adnnxu
 
Posts: n/a
Re:Oaths...

I hate to bump into this.

I have a question:Are you all,in this thread,Corporate morons?
Do you accept,consent to THEIR Corporate authority,jurisdiction?

If you like THEM,study very well THEIR Corporate CODE and try to stay
worry free.

I think,Americans from the Union States have an identity problem today.

Ask yourself a simple question: WHO AM I?

Planet Earth is blue and is a lot that you can do!!!

Adrian
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-13-2005, 06:19 AM
David Merrill's Avatar
David Merrill David Merrill is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,326
interface

Yes, of course the truth invokes that attitude.

I have no Date of Birth. I have no Birth Certificate. No Social Security Number. So no. I am not a corporate moron.

Unless you are writing from an island, your isolationism ends the moment you step out the door. I groom courts of competent jurisdiction in conformity with the 'saving to suitors' clause:

"...the United States, ... within their respective districts, as well as upon the high seas; (a) saving to suitors, in all cases, the right of a common law remedy, where the common law is competent to give it; and shall also have exclusive original cognizance of all seizures on land,..." The First Judiciary Act; September 24, 1789; Chapter 20, page 77. The Constitution of the United States of America, Revised and Annotated - Analysis and Interpretation - 1982; Article III, ยง2, Cl. 1 Diversity of Citizenship, U.S. Government Printing Office document 99-16, p. 741.

These are people who because of general conditions cannot simply forsake their colorable identities. The gas station attendant and McDonald's are by custom and usage expecting colorable currency.

I am glad, sarcastic as you sound in your Post, that you brought up identity*. Thank you. I am David Merrill. This is not my birth certificate but you can see that from the first line, it is suggested that I operate within the public trust as a beneficiary of the World Bank system of confidence and security building measures. [The second line reveals I was born to Philip Jansen and Louanne.]

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...tification.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ification2.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ification3.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ification4.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ification5.jpg
Registration as chattel by Birth Certificate

I am not David Merrill Van Pelt (legal or "full" name) unless and until I say so.

http://ecclesia.org/forum/images/suitors/abatement.gif
http://ecclesia.org/forum/images/suitors/judgment.jpg
http://ecclesia.org/forum/images/suitors/affidavit2.jpg
Abatement for misnomer


Regards,

David Merrill.



* By the way, your name is a little hard to pronounce.

P.S. If you study out "Name" in Black's Fifth Edition you will see that for the purposes of a law dictionary "Name" is identical to "Legal name". That is to say true name suffixed with the family or surname.

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...abatement1.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...abatement2.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf..._default_9.jpg
http://ecclesia.org/forum/images/suitors/Default.jpg
eradication of SARS

P.P.S. You may order up any documents by their reception number at (719) 520-6200. I suggest you want the Credit River Money Decision , about lack of consideration referred to in one of the abatements.

Last edited by David Merrill : 05-13-2005 at 06:44 AM. Reason: Style. I read it and think of additional things.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-13-2005, 10:05 AM
ProudHillbilly
 
Posts: n/a
Smile adnnxu, yeah, we are all "morons" (for now)

I am not sure what issues you may have to prompt you to write such a hostile retort to this thread.

I am, above all else, a citizen of planet Earth with all my God-given rights that are entailed. Rights also specify a certain amount of care to the duties of that citizenship. Respect and civility on the part of each and every citizen of this planet to the other citizens would go far to solve many of today's biggest problems. Think about that for a minute or two, adnnxu.

I am here without consent to begin with as my parents failed to consult with me on the matter. I am the product of their choice to have children, as are you.

We each seek our own ways after we are given life.

I cannot see an abrupt withdrawal from the system that is in place in America today. The history of our country and our government has been one of a gradual suppression of individuals by attempting to lump us all into statistical numbers and other assorted groups for their own convenience.

We will each break our chains gradually and in our own ways by dealing with our own issues as they arise. I am delighted to find this group and this forum and intend to learn all I can.

I find David Merrill's posts enlightening and instructive. Many thanks from this moron, Mr. Merrill. Hopefully, with the help of all here I can rise to a higher level of brain function soon.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Totaly Lost Going To Jail D.Dog Family Rights 93 08-10-2008 03:35 AM
Oaths and Verification SKYGZR Court 0 08-11-2005 01:36 AM
Oaths Of Office weishaupt1776 Court 12 11-15-2004 06:06 AM
Oaths of office not taken. Need Case Law HenryBowman Court 5 09-28-2004 10:19 AM
Oaths and the Bible Smart-Aleck Religion 0 08-14-2004 01:18 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:59 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2008 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer