Deep Judicial Corruption - ADVICE NEEDED

Originally Posted by iamfreeru2

I may be wrong but I do believe that Bucko8 is also Bucko9, don't ya think? Frequents Quatloos regularly and I do believe that is why he gives the answers he does. I believe him to be nothing more than a troll. I would not doubt it if he is some type of gov. agent or attorney or just an informant, hmm? It's either that or he just plain brainwashed into believing all the garbage he spews out.

Nope, someone else registered the name to be a troll. Isn't me.

[David Merrill]

There was a suitor in the US Courthouse in Denver. I was waiting in the Wall Street Deli a block over on the ground floor of the Qwest Building.

As I was going out to the street I was loading my Goofy PEZ dispenser. I passed a white-haired man in the hall as another gentleman approached him as "Judge so-and-so" and complimented him on a recent white paper.

Filling a PEZ dispenser while walking is tricky so it is no surprise that near the door out into the courtyard (smoking area) the man was catching up with me after his brief conversation. I asked, "Are you an Article III judge." He reacted from the gut it seemed with a short chuckle and said, "Yeah! Hardly ever." But as we were both pressing the pushbars to open the doors he stopped to consider me carefully. If both my hands were not busy that is where we would have shook and intruduced ourselves. The moment grew a little clumsey and passed. I did not want to tell him my name.

When we were both in the courtyard he answered again, "Yeah. That hardly ever happens. But I have been thinking about that."

Then he jaywalked across the street and entered the Tenth Circuit courthouse (old Post Office Building). Like he was a justice returning from a lunch break.

I have always thought that short encounter was very edifying.


Regards,

David Merrill.

That you didn't share a Pezz with this fellow he may have thought... hummm?

Originally Posted by iamfreeru2

I may be wrong but I do believe that Bucko8 is also Bucko9, don't ya think? Frequents Quatloos regularly and I do believe that is why he gives the answers he does. I believe him to be nothing more than a troll. I would not doubt it if he is some type of gov. agent or attorney or just an informant, hmm? It's either that or he just plain brainwashed into believing all the garbage he spews out.

Nope, someone else registered the name to be a troll. Isn't me.

[Akira]

Phew....

Although I haven't read everything above yet... I was a bit worried...

I pounded that out after an interesting event, when I was a bit frustrated... then I left and hadn't been back to read the responses, for almost 48 hours... I am relieved no one was offended, as that was never my intent !

It is almost 3 am... I will disclose the 'trigger' event, later today...

but for now... bed !!

For HIS Glory,
Akira

[Akira]

Hi All,

Before I begin, let me again apologise.. it really was quite shallow and self serving of me to take advantage of Buck08 like that.. Grace is definately not my strong suit... as, in the following example, I ruffled someone else's feathers, as well...

Well... here's what got me all wound up...

As some of you know.. my motivation for studying is that I had my sons taken away by Human Services, using totally trumpted up accusations.. (Mom commited felony fraud... so Human Services gave her a job, and destoyed the evidence of the felony!)

Anyway, I went to the court house to get the names of the Magistrates involved so I could sue and lien them. The woman clerk at the civil window is an old high school classmate of mine, and everytime I go in, I usually bring her something 'truth/corruption' based to read. The previous docs were how 80%+ of Protection from Abuse / Peace Bond cases lack the competent 3rd party witness and are therefore "Null & Void".

This time however, I got the "I don't know the law, and I don't want to know the law, I'm just a clerk here, and I'm happy with that"

I didn't bother to press the matter, I just left.

In hindsight though, I realized, she had picked up the phone, as I had left her window.

When I left the courthouse, there were two men across the street, attempting to take my picture, with a cell phone camera.

Since I never got closer than 50 feet to them, I can't imagine they got much of a shot... Do cell phone cameras have that kind of resolution built into them these days?

But considering this event, and the Mafia style warning from the DA, after my OAS win... I'm a bit concerned and pissed ! lol

It kills me to think that my generation, is the one that rebeled so badly in the late 60's and early 70's with slogans like "Question Authority !!"

Where'd all the hippies go? lol

The other reason for my frustration, is I have some friends, who are setting themselves up for a major fall... you can lead a horse to water...

I keep praying the 'Big Guy' will send his Son, ASAP, since, sadly, extreme pain seems to be the only vehicle man currently accepts as a cue to wake up... heh... it's very effective though... at least, it sure worked on me !

For HIS Glory,
Akira

[Akira]

Originally Posted by its2die4

Because, obviously my affidavits (5 in total now) are completely ineffective and this so-called legal maxim “an unrebutted affidavit stands as the truth in the matter” is completely laughable to me at this point.

Its2Die4

Did you write up the 5 affidavits, and just notarize them, and submit them? Or did you go thru the default process?

[its2die4]

You all have provided an immense amount of information to me and for this I thank you all.

To "theghost" I say: I have attempted to email you and it would not allow so I have sent a private message instead... as for the eftrans stuff; yes I have all of their stuff and it is unfortunately without a great detail of explanation and also FOIA's take too long to get back what you've requested if they ever do comply with.

To "chuckhs12" I say: Commercial Liens are a fast ticket into the graybar hotel when used against the enemy as far as my research has revealed.

To "Mr.Yet" I say: Thank you for the plethora of Am Jur et al much of which I have used in various pleadings to the court with absolultly no recognition of the law within. And yes they did send a notice at the time of the assignment as required by the law however their assignment document that is fraud denotes another entity other than the entity that it was actually transfered to. They have manufactured this document only for their deceitful convenience to successfully defend against my Quiet Title/Holder In Due Course action.

To "David Merrill" - WOW! And come again please? You said the below and then quoted from my original post but yet I not had ample time to even review all that you have posted and it may take a whole lot more time than what I have to remedy my situation:
It is not my system. It is the system.

But I can tell you did not take much time to read the Libel of Review and other links.

From the original pleading:


Quote:
I have found this completely shocking although shouldn’t since I have for the last 2 years filed rock solid pleading after pleading that have continually been denied by all judges to-date.



To get a clue, understand that at least from my research and humble opinion, the fatal mistake is to consider that these pleadings are being presented to judges. The reason the man is getting no judicial reaponses is that he is not properly moving judiciary or judicial judges.

Originally Posted by its2die4

Quote:
I have found this completely shocking although shouldn’t since I have for the last 2 years filed rock solid pleading after pleading that have continually been denied by all judges to-date.



To get a clue, understand that at least from my research and humble opinion, the fatal mistake is to consider that these pleadings are being presented to judges. The reason the man is getting no judicial reaponses is that he is not properly moving judiciary or judicial judges.

I'M INTRIGUED ABOUT THIS TOO. HOW DO WE FILE PROPER MOTIONS FOR JUDICIAL JUDGES?
BTW, THE LATEST FILING FROM THE ATTORNEY REPESENTING THIS ALLEGED AUTO LENDER I'M IN LITIGATION WITH STATES " Plaintiff may resort to judicial process to aid it in obtaining possession of the Collateral."
WHAT GIVES? I THOUGH THIS LAWSUIT WAS A JUDICIAL PROCESS!!!

CAN SOMEONE SHED SOME LIGHT ON THIS?

[David Merrill]

The rumor is that you will get no judge until you secure mandatory judicial notice of the officer's oath of office. This would seem to leave that up to the "judge" whether or not he wants to be a judge or not (magistrate). A judge can only be in a judiciary, right?

I did some work on this today. I posted it somewhere but will post it here again. I will let the phone conversation be explained in the follow up letter. I have groomed many courts of competent jurisdiction to date. About sixty are on a group email so many of them are sending letters inquiring in their own words. I encourage you do the same. If you are in state or county court, just track the oaths and if they are not in place properly filed in repository, great. The prosecution is disqualified. If they are in place, greater. Demand an enacting clause (find the requirement in the state constitution - Article V, Section 18.) No subject matter jurisdiction if you have broken no law.

http://Friends-n-Family-Research.inf...9;_AG_oath.jpg
http://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/elec...2001_const.pdf
from State Constitutions

David Merrill
[(719) xxx-xxxx]

Chairman, Committee on Codes of Conduct
c/o General Counsel
Administrative Office of the
United States Courts
One Columbus Circle, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20544


Dear John Chastain;


I hope this will clarify my concern about the integrity of the oath process. I am sure you are already aware that the oath is really the center of the good conduct process. Maybe you understood my concerns from our phone call on June 1, 2005.

Attached is a copy from the State of Colorado constitution; Article XII, Sections 9-10. They describe the written oath, after it is taken be filed within thirty days at the secretary of state. This means there is an impartial repository where people may acquire certified copies of the oath and evidence the judge is bound to the Constitution(s).

The rumor, which agrees with experience, is that the only way to acquire a judge (instead of some kind of administrative magistrate) is to get him or her to take judicial notice of their oath from the bench and on the case record. So without knowing this people are not really before a judge most of the time. And even knowing this, it is difficult to get these magistrates to take that judicial notice.

In other words, the oath is just a ceremony that depends on the validation of the person who took it (any time in the future) to be real and enforceable. This is of concern to the Committee on Codes of Conduct. I am sure there is a process, maybe in the United States Codes by which the oaths of federal judges after taken are laid in an authenticating repository like the district attorneys in Colorado with the secretary of state. But I cannot find it and if you do not know like indicated in our phone conversation then that is no surprise.

Please examine the attached oath of office of attorney general John Suthers. It looks as though John was happy to allow his office to be running vacant until somebody inquired. [In fact he ran the district attorney office in Colorado Springs vacant for eight years in the ‘90s. Then one day I filed the certificate of fact in the district court and he quit his post the next morning.] The secretary of state told the inquiring man they would not provide a certificate of fact that John’s oath was not filed the day before. The man said he would be back the next day, May 3 for the certificate anyway, with the mission statement of the secretary’s office. The reason they would not provide a certificate of fact on something they did not have anymore was because they got into too much trouble. Later May 2 they called and told him John had faxed his oath over but they could not provide a certified copy of it as a filed oath because it was a fax. So it looks like John had to run over to the Supreme Court and get Mary J. Mullarkey’s signature on his way to the secretary of state’s office on the morning of May 3.

I feel this is an inquiry your office should be capable of answering. If not, then you should understand my concern about lack of authenticating repositories to make these oaths available upon demand by anybody willing to pay a certification fee.

Please contact me by the phone number above when you have any information about filing requirements of oaths of federal judges.


Thank you,

I apologize if it seems evasive. But I tried to explain it already and seem to have failed. I have been there though, trying to educate (the highschool friend now telling you no more literature; betraying you like a terrorist or criminal). I quit that years ago. Refusal for cause is the only thing that will work. Think about it. If an attorney paid for law school, why is he or she going to sit and listen to you?


Regards,

David Merrill.