Appointment of fiduciary?

I have the Appointment of Fiduciary docs under The Admiralty Rules, (in fed court)

Does anyone have an appointment of fiduciary for use in state court?

Thanks in advance,

Henry Franklin

I used the same doc, cuz the State of Michigan courts are Fed courts.

Hope that helps!

Wrong thread. Sorry

Bob

Originally Posted by Mr. Incredible

Wrong thread. Sorry

Bob

What's wrong, Bob, need another cupa joe?

HenryFranklin

Let me clarify that North Carolina does not include the Admiralty rules in their Rules of Civil [sic] Procedure.


This is why I am wondering what to do about the State Court.

I am in a suit that I initiated, and I cannot appear as my fiction, but must appoint a fiduciary.

Any ideas?

Thanks

Henry Franklin

[David Merrill]

I have not studied out the appointment of fiduciary. But I have been told that anyone involved in an official capacity competent to hold the title "power of attorney" properly appointed is stuck with it; the appointment. Maybe that is true. If so, on that premise I have recently suggested appointing Donald Burnham ENSENAT, Chief of Protocol for the State Department (Louisana State Bar #05358 [inactive (and therefore in good standing) since March 5, 2002]). Something makes eloquent sense about appointing the state department. Since all the international accords like Jamaica Rambouillet are published in the Department of State Bulletin.

http://www.ecclesia.org/forum/images.../SeizeGold.jpg

Look closely.

http://www.state.gov/s/cpr/
http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/biog/3328.htm

Not only is Donald running a successful maritime law firm in his hometown New Orleans, Louisiana is the only State that did not adopt the UCC. I have heard this is due to Louisiana adopting the common law of France instead of the common law of England.

Therefore consider appointing Donald Burnham for your fiduciary. At least if the rumor the appointment sticks is true the appointment would likely not fall on deaf ears.

As far as the admiralty venue goes, I understand the two inch gold fringes are admiralty fringes. Therefore see Admiralty Law in American Jurisprudence at Law of the Flag. I think it possible to integrate any of the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims into any lower proceedings in respect for the law of the flag.

I saw an attorney appear restricted citing Rule E(8) in county court for a traffic matter. The attorney was so confident in a dismissal the client did not even show up. The officer had in January, so typically put the last year on the citation. What was amusing is that the judge would not dismiss the cause in open court and said it was because I was in the gallery. I was learning a lot alright. The attorney took me out into the hall and was explaining some things but chiefly because he was annoyed that I had affected his dismissal. He would have to come back and announce himself, so that I could not find the case on the docket I suppose, and the judge all but promised him an open court dismissal if he would only return for it while I was not there.


Regards,

David Merrill.

Rule E(8) Restricted Appearance. An appearance to defend against an admiralty and maritime claim with respect to which there has issued process in rem, or process of attachment and garnishment, may be expressly restricted to the defense of such claim, and in that event is not an appearance for the purposes of any other claim with respect to which such process is not available or has not been served.

David has left enough research (Happy Trails) material in his threads and posts that clearly show that the so-called law of the sea/water is the so-called law on the land (admiralty & maritime).

In other words, the fiction the foreign corporations/agents utilize are in all States of (international contract law).

[David Merrill]

Colorable identities (not just Strawman but legal name too) open the door for colorable money (legal tender) and land (real estate), colorable and even absence of title (warranty deed and certificate of title on cars).

[futop]

to start learning how to use the Admiralty/Maritime law to our benefit rather than detriment. As wargames stated, it does seem more and more that they are using Admiralty/Maritime against us. Is that why a lot of actions against us seem to be "in rem" as against our property and rights to property? I may not be totally correct in that statement. That is why I want to learn more about Admiralty/Maritime law.

I once read on another post in a different forum that when you are pulled over by the police, it is like a ship overtaking another ship on the seas and taking all the goods i.e. the car and your body(vessel) when you don't "cooperate" (admiralty/maritime).

[weishaupt1776]

There is no doubt the IRS is working Admiralty on people when seizing property
9.7.2.9.2*(07-15-2002)

• Complaint for Forfeiture
  Formal civil judicial forfeiture proceedings are initiated by the filing of a complaint against the property pursuant to Supplemental Rule C(2).

9.7.13.5.1*(08-11-2003)

• Warrant of Arrest In Rem
  A Warrant of Arrest in rem is used to seize property for Title 26 forfeitures when the proceedings are civil judicial. Proceedings in rem are governed by the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty and Maritime Claims. In addition to the USAO, Area Counsel must also be consulted so that they can review the affidavit for the warrant. They must also obtain concurrence from Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Criminal Tax) before a forfeiture action can be initiated.

The DOJ, too
2209 Alternatives to Seizure

• 
  In certain circumstances, it may be advisable not to seize and take actual possession of the property, but only to "arrest" it for forfeiture by execution of a Warrant of Arrest under Rule C(3) of the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims.

2280 Warrant of Arrest In Rem

• AND FURTHER TO SERVE upon the record owner thereof a copy of this warrant in a manner consistent with the principles of service of process of an action in rem under the Supplemental Rules For Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, within a reasonable time of seizure