Claims Court?

[Grench]

What if the courts ask's me, "are you the defendant"? And I say, "prosuctor,
would you like to state "that" {i.e. defendant(s) name because, the state claims it by stating the defenant name is "OF" or is in the possesion under state statue} claim"? I'm putting the federal/state on blast by asking them to "own the defendant" {because, they DO} and then, the "state/federal" will have there "claim" by equal and due protection. In other words, are they creating a party they "don't" claim? Is that possiable? Does anyone have a cited case like that?

Thans All,
Phillip Gillon

[Libertarian]

I am not sure what you are trying to accomplish-- could you spell it out better for me?

[Grench]

What I mean is, if the STATE has possession of the NAME of the person in said charge could'nt you ask the prosuctor to "own up" to the defendant that it "represents"?


Phil