
07-26-2005, 08:47 PM
|
|
Waking Up
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: N.W. Missouri
Posts: 38
|
|
|
Another ticket slaying started...
Today my beloved and I went and filed the first set of ticketslayer papers.Didn't really know what to expect.We had the Afidavit of truth notorized and witnessed.I'm hoping that was the correct way to file.I don't recall reading that in the directions but it sure seemed needed.The D.A.'s secretary did not stamp any of the two copies we submitted.She said that the court clerk was all that was needed.As well as we filed some what out of order,court clerk then notory then da office.We went to a title company to have the papers notorized.Be fore we left my wife was asked to sign a book resembling a guest book date ,afidavit notarized ,name.I'm curious for feed back as to if we did anything wrong in our process today.We are both so conditioned that we felt like we were doing something "illegal" ha what a rush.The rest of the day I had Steve Millers song "take the money and run" going through my head.If no replies I will keep everyone posted on our progress.Direction, insight comments welcomed.
|

08-07-2005, 03:29 PM
|
|
Waking Up
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: N.W. Missouri
Posts: 38
|
|
|
Well tomorrow we go to file the final TS docs for a speeding violation.I hope that the absence of posts is because we have done everything correctly.I know that this isn't the world series to most but to my wife and I we feel like little leaguers going to the stadium.Any comment \direction would be nice.I will keep posting our progress as it occurs.
|

08-07-2005, 04:40 PM
|
 |
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,422
|
|
|
The TS route is a common law method....It requires the signatures of two witnesses verifying your identity. notary not needed. I wouldve gotten stamped copies from the court clerk and had a buddy serve the DA's clerk.
What you are doing is creating your own court as it were and obtaining a judgement by default. The writs of praecipe and mandamus are you demanding the court act upon the DA's default.
I helped a buddy file TS paperwork and when he got to court, the DA didnt bother to show and the BAILIFF of all people handled the case. The judge stated that she didnt see anything denying her jurisdiction BUT the bailiff stopped the judge before she could render her decision against him. Reason being he said, There is a default here in the record and we havent had a chance to talk with the defendant yet concerning this"
The bailiff and the issuing officer then took my friend into the hall and made an "offer" bringing the speeding charge down to an obstructing traffic charge that carries no points. Unfortunately he capitulated and funny thing is, when they went back into the court room, the judge was GONE! LOL
My take is this....she was willing to walk all over the writs BUT the bailiff saved her backside from professional sanctions by bringing up the default! Had he been a little more with it, he could make life hell for the judge!
Best of luck to you and looking forward to reading about your success
|

08-07-2005, 04:44 PM
|
 |
Sui Juris Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Maine state
Posts: 873
|
|
Maximus,
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Maximus
We had the Afidavit of truth notorized and witnessed.I'm hoping that was the correct way to file.I don't recall reading that in the directions but it sure seemed needed.
|
The properly documented twin signatures, at the end of the Aff of Truth, are all that is needed... no notatrization is necessary...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Maximus
we filed some what out of order,court clerk then notory then da office.
|
Although you will never get "called on the carpet" for it... you're supposed to file your docs with the court clerk last... after all others have been served.
When it comes to going to court... when YOUR NAME is called, get up and challenge jurisdiction RIGHT THEN. don't let it go any further, as the court loves to presume, and will see ANY cooperation WHATSOEVER, as an excuse for jurisdiction...
Per another persons experience, on another thread....
Just saying "I'm here on special appearence" and/or "not general" is not enough...
Even if you are uncomfortable saying the opening dialog I presented in the OAS WIN thread, you must define yourself somehow... simply saying "that's not me" or "that's a misnomer" or "i'm here on special appearence" is NOT a sufficient rebuttal, any more than, "that's not true" or "liar" or "no way".... you must state FACTS ! Tell them who you are !
If you are uncomfortable with the religeous references in the dialog... at least say you are a Citizen of the original dejure jurisdiction of such and such republic/commonwealth/state or whatever the real name of your state is...
Try to include as much of the dialog as you can... the TS docs are NOT boiler plate, and need all the support you can give them..
Good Luck !
For HIS Glory,
Akira
__________________
Akira = Akira-
Counselor in Law (student) - I live it, I don't 'practice'
No post is ever intended as 'legal' advice. Lawful perspectives discussed openly.
"Pro and Con are opposites, this is plainly seen.
If progress means 'to move forward', what does congress mean?" - Nipsy Russel
"It's not the will to win, it's the will to prepare to win." - Bobby Knight
|

08-07-2005, 05:49 PM
|
 |
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 901
|
|
|
For the most part, the suggestions about how to handle your case you get around here should be entitled: Welcome to do-it-yourself-vasectomy.
Theoretically, it can be done. But one has to ask if you have the skills - you know, the visual acuity and the eye-hand coordination? Not to mention trying to do it while the excruciating pain renders you unconscious before you have the time to stop the bleeding.
The promoters of the schemes here will testify all day as to their alleged efficacy and how many victories they have heard about. But you have to consider the prospect that they are only posting that they were aware of someone allegedly successful in performing the surgery and surviving the experience.
Even then, given their "expertise" in the subject, the other party to the situation (the potential bearer of the child) might want to question how viable the self-performed "surgery" was.
Got those scalpels ready?
|

08-07-2005, 06:57 PM
|
 |
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,422
|
|
Cant be much worse than forking over a few hundred FRN's for a shyster and him selling you out and you still get to pay the fine and points. Shakespeare was right....Kill all the lawyers!!!  AKira did just fine without one!
|

08-07-2005, 07:24 PM
|
 |
The Outta Commissiona
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Republic
Posts: 5,305
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Judge Roy Bean
For the most part, the suggestions about how to handle your case you get around here should be entitled: Welcome to do-it-yourself-vasectomy.
|
JRB, if you were behind the bench, we'd rip your balls off, feed 'em to the bailiffs, then mop the blood off the courtroom floor w/ your wig
__________________
Quit Walking Around Like a Half Breed Freeman Find Out How
DOWNLOAD THIS COURSE NOW !!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jerry Pitts
The whole system is based upon a 'presumption' that something was represented to have occurred which may or may not have occurred in the manner which has been represented.
|
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro - Hunter S. Thompson
|

08-07-2005, 07:42 PM
|
 |
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Illinois(chi-town)
Posts: 5,076
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by weishaupt1776
JRB, if you were behind the bench, we'd rip your balls off, feed 'em to the bailiffs, then mop the blood off the courtroom floor w/ your wig
|
Weis, you are very funny. HeHehehehehe! Go-get-em. Iam laughing my balls off.
__________________
Resolution pending
Last edited by charlesa6 : 08-07-2005 at 07:44 PM.
|

08-07-2005, 08:12 PM
|
 |
Sui Juris Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Maine state
Posts: 873
|
|
jRB,
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by judge Roy Bean
The promoters of the schemes here will testify all day as to their alleged efficacy and how many victories they have heard about.
|
Gosh, you make it hard to be humble....
I'm sorry to burst your bubble, but I am speaking from personal experience...
As a matter of fact, the "officers of the court" were so impressed, I was privately given the "Mafia speech" by the DA, as follows:
Quote:
|
"the courts and judges are very powerful, and they don't like what you're doing" and adviced "you may want to keep the information to yourself !"
|
I, in turn, humbly advised the DA, that "God Almighty doesn't like what 'they' are doing, and he (the DA), by all means, should spread the word !" It wiped the 'cheshire grin' smile, right off his face.
Ya know judge? They really blew their hand... if they had kept their mouths shut, I just might have presumed that I had just gotten "lucky".
But after our little private chat... I KNEW I had done so well... it had scared the CRAP out of them, and they were trying to return the favor.
Maybe you have a good poker face... but these folks sure didn't...
Nice try judge...
So, I wonder... are you being compensated for your discouraging posts, or are you just afraid the public will realize the truth, and what you have done to so many, and they'll show up at your door with noose in hand?
There's still time to repent!
For HIS Glory,
Akira
__________________
Akira = Akira-
Counselor in Law (student) - I live it, I don't 'practice'
No post is ever intended as 'legal' advice. Lawful perspectives discussed openly.
"Pro and Con are opposites, this is plainly seen.
If progress means 'to move forward', what does congress mean?" - Nipsy Russel
"It's not the will to win, it's the will to prepare to win." - Bobby Knight
|

08-08-2005, 02:32 PM
|
 |
Sui Juris Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Maine state
Posts: 873
|
|
|
Free Common Law Study Book !
Here is a FREE ( $35 value) copy of
THE LAW OF MANDAMUS and the PRACTICE CONNECTED WITH IT, with an APPENDIX OF FORMS by Halsey H. Moses, Counselor-At-Law
This is a major asset to any common law library... ENJOY !!
When Uploads is working properly, I will add this to the common law section.... (currently I get "ERROR: cannot access the upload store file directory. please chmod the "store" directory with value 0777 (xrw-xrw-xrw)!")
For HIS Glory,
Akira
__________________
Akira = Akira-
Counselor in Law (student) - I live it, I don't 'practice'
No post is ever intended as 'legal' advice. Lawful perspectives discussed openly.
"Pro and Con are opposites, this is plainly seen.
If progress means 'to move forward', what does congress mean?" - Nipsy Russel
"It's not the will to win, it's the will to prepare to win." - Bobby Knight
Last edited by Akira : 08-08-2005 at 02:36 PM.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:55 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
|
|