Court Discuss the tactics used by the court system, and how to develop your counter-tactics for success in the courtroom, dealing with citations, criminal and civil matters.


Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > Court
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 08-15-2005, 11:36 PM
jeffmar10 jeffmar10 is offline
Waking Up
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 29
oops

I ment to say motion to compel, not a motion to comply, It was late and my brain was on shutdown, Sorry. You can file a motion to compel for "production of documents", "interrogatories", and "requests for admissions".
__________________
Jeffmar10
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-16-2005, 01:16 AM
dashboy's Avatar
dashboy dashboy is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: California
Posts: 329
What consititutes good faith effort to meet and confer?

dashboy~
__________________
I just figured it out! It's all for free!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-16-2005, 03:09 AM
dadmoonbunny's Avatar
dadmoonbunny dadmoonbunny is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 272
surely, I shall try

Quote:
Originally Posted by dashboy
dadmoonbunny,
can you elaborate?

dash~

This comes a bit late, but from another thread, I understand that a Motion is something that courts routinely run right over, Whereas petitioning the court is something a sovereign would do. Mind you, I have not checked Black's or any other reference on this. Just me thinkin' on screen.


Corrections (as always) welcomed


Sic Gorgiamus Alus Subjuctatos Nunc.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-16-2005, 03:30 PM
PJT04
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by weishaupt1776
Something i have heard of a bunch, is the MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION (OF DOCUMENTS).

That's the keyword search you need to do

8,000 hits


I'VE USED THIS MOTION BEFORE AND IT WAS TOTALLY IGNORED.
I MENTIONED PRODUCTION OF ORIGINAL NOTE SINCE THE OPPOSING PARTY MENTIONED IN WRITING THAT THEY HAVE POSSESSION OF ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS. WHEN GOING IN FRONT OF THE JUDGE, THEY CAME IN WITH NOTHING BUT COPIES. I OBJECTED AND REQUESTED TO SEE THE ORIGINAL NOTE FOR THE MILLIONTH TIME. NO NEED FOR THAT SAID THE JUDGE, YOU CAN APPEAL THIS CASE IF YOU WANT.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-16-2005, 03:33 PM
dashboy's Avatar
dashboy dashboy is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: California
Posts: 329
PJT04,
what were your affirmative defenses in your answer? Did you use material alteration of the original note and fraud in the factum?

dashboy~
__________________
I just figured it out! It's all for free!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Proper Service? 1sissygirl Banks, Collectors, and CRAs 16 05-02-2008 12:33 AM
Text of public law 73-10 kgod999 UCC 87 02-11-2008 09:30 AM
Alternatives from Dorean bluev103 Banks, Collectors, and CRAs 191 08-26-2005 04:56 AM
Court Seals My Documents!!! kgod999 Court 4 12-04-2004 03:56 PM
Opinions please--CRA" Verification Documents not available" seeker Banks, Collectors, and CRAs 7 08-23-2004 02:55 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:02 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2008 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer