Are things any better in Federal Court

[justice4all]

Just returned from court. Lost by default, as judge would not allow me to represent WIFE, even though I had a power of attorney over the STRAW WOMAN and a UCC claim. This was a credit card case. Would it be worth a try
filing in federal court? Or any other ideas?

[Judge Roy Bean]

Originally Posted by justice4all

Just returned from court. Lost by default, as judge would not allow me to represent WIFE, even though I had a power of attorney over the STRAW WOMAN and a UCC claim. This was a credit card case. Would it be worth a try
filing in federal court? Or any other ideas?

Having a power of attorney to make decisions for someone doesn't grant you a license to practice law on their behalf.

You're probably barred by res judicata and I suspect the court has seen enough of the "STRAW" nonsense and UCC claim stuff that you probably don't even have grounds for an effective appeal. The people who keep badgering courts with this stuff end up being warned against it then they become classified as vexatious litigants and even sanctioned or held in contempt.

It's like barging into an operating room and telling the surgeons you're there to make sure they remove the patient's spleen with YOUR dull-spoon technique because you've read that in 1897 some doctor in France secretly proved it was the only right way to do it. Fortunately for the patient, they're not only not going to listen to you, they'll have you thrown out of the O.R.

I think the sooner you realize that judges are whores, selling out to the highest bidder the better off you will be.

The only court of competent jurisdiction is you.

Read the David Merrill postings on this board, and at http://ecclesia.org/forum/

for an idea on what's going on in that arena.

This post is just my opinion, although I have seen quite a few judges who are whores. They have no time for the truth. They have lawyers lined up waiting to "serve" [service] them and build their retirement.

Henry Franklin

[justice4all]

Judge Roy Bean, just for the record, bar attorneys do not have a licence either.

As far as the case goes. I am just trying to look into all the options. I may
take the matter to federal court, which may include sueing the judge. The judge is not imune if his acts were ultra-vires. He lacked subject matter, denied
remedy (right under California Commercial Code), commited purjury of Oath and nonfeasance.

[Judge Roy Bean]

Originally Posted by justice4all

Judge Roy Bean, just for the record, bar attorneys do not have a licence either.

Be sure to raise that one too in your next court session and see how much further you get.

Originally Posted by justice4all

As far as the case goes. I am just trying to look into all the options.

No you're not. You're deliberately ignoring the options. Your adherence to disproven theory you've collected around here while trying to play lawyer clouds your judgment.

Would you do the same kind of thing if it were a life-threatening medical emergency? What makes you think you can become a lawyer via a few weeks on the computer? Think you can be a doctor as well? Would you risk your life on something you came up with on the 'net or have a trauma spe******t treat you when you're dying from internal injuries?

Originally Posted by justice4all

I may take the matter to federal court, which may include sueing the judge. The judge is not imune if his acts were ultra-vires. He lacked subject matter, denied remedy (right under California Commercial Code), commited purjury of Oath and nonfeasance.

That's your opinion based on your flawed understanding of the law and the process. Your opinion has been wrong thus far and has only made things worse, but fire away.

Let us know how it turns out.

Greetings..

neophyte here. new to your venue. Don't know how much i have to offer.. but having peruse thru several forums thus far.. i believe i am likely to learn a lot.. & for that i wich thank one & all.. now.. as to:

credit card debt? you shouldst be able to eliminate this.. as of course.. they never lent you anything in the first place..

now as to geting them to .. realize the error of their ways..

have you looked into FDCPA §1692 et seq. and FCRA §1681. ?
quite a few folks in my neck of the woods have found great success with this. as well as.. voiding any arbitration enforcement.. & certain citings relevant to state court actions.. have proved favourable too.. if they already have drawn you into that venue..

peace be with ye

[justice4all]

Judge, would you care to make any suggestions on how you would discharge a
credit card case. For what ever it is worth, very little of my court documents are from a few hours on the internet. Have completed several years of college law classes and many hours in the law library. As far as the case at hand it would seem that that the plaintiff, nor the court can answer this simple question:

California Code of Civil Proceedure§25: A civil action arises out of: 1. An obligation; 2. An injury.

Where is the injury?

They seem to insist on assuming facts not in evidence.

"The practice of Law can not be licensed by any state/State." Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. pgs.238, 239 of the United States Reports.

Originally Posted by satorifarm

Greetings..

neophyte here. new to your venue. Don't know how much i have to offer.. but having peruse thru several forums thus far.. i believe i am likely to learn a lot.. & for that i wich thank one & all.. now.. as to:

credit card debt? you shouldst be able to eliminate this.. as of course.. they never lent you anything in the first place..

now as to geting them to .. realize the error of their ways..

have you looked into FDCPA §1692 et seq. and FCRA §1681. ?
quite a few folks in my neck of the woods have found great success with this. as well as.. voiding any arbitration enforcement.. & certain citings relevant to state court actions.. have proved favourable too.. if they already have drawn you into that venue..

peace be with ye

Hi welcome to the forum and yes you will add a lot to this forum glad to see you here.
Now as far as winning in court they are either whores or have made a pack with the devil for sure and you will not win in court if you do it will be like I did just enough to let you think you got ahead then they come and get your butt. This gentleman is correct and we are doing just that he is farthur along than I am and he will be able to teach me a lot on this subject. This may be the only way we can get any justice and believe me it hasn't been big so far but every little bit helps. 1692 suits may be the only way to go anymore and I wish you well and you will need to really learn it and go thru each and every correspondence from them. Bobbie