Motion for Ex Parte Order - Additions?

[Akira]

Originally Posted by gatorguy3

So am I correct to assume if I did not have a marriage contract and I didn't enter into a marriage agreement with my ex and the state...then I would not be held accountable for the support? I find that so far from the truth.

The state always presumes jurisdiction... If you never contracted with the state via a marriage license, they would still assume jurisdiction, and they would still attempt to hold you accountable for the support. It would just be easier to challenge jurisdiction, without the marriage license.

For HIS Glory,
Akira

Originally Posted by iamfreeru2

My heart goes out to you. I know where you are coming from. In 1986 my daughter was effectively taken from me. I fought for visitation with my daughter to only have the court deny it based on my faith. In the last almost twenty years I have had a total of 6 months with my daughter. She is 29 years old now and I have not even spoken to her in the last 12 years. I paid child support for eight years and could not see her.

I will say I have been blessed with another wife and daughter. YHWH has been good to me. I will pray you have clear direction and that you will prevail.

i know this is off point and im sorry but i had to tell u Iamfree, that brought tears to my eyes im sittin here cryin like a baby. i always wish i was the only one who had to go through that mess but i guess not. however you are blessed with another family...my best goes out to you and yours.

also for all, yes the state does go for juris as the baby was born in that state and the state is liabel for taking care of it under parens patrie(?) state as parent. and since we dont rebut that it stands as truth. look in your statutes find that one and rebut it BEFORE you have a child.