quick lesson if arreseted or being charge in court

[Jerseee]

hakeem,



Not to credit or discredit your process but, why would a person do all of that if they have adjudicated case law available to them to fight a good fight?



I mean, what you are speaking of maybe sound, but is it supported by the constitution and your god given rights?



In other words, is it necessaryto do all of that when you have a remedy in public policy and Supreme Court cases that have a decision on the matter?



I'm not challenging the validity of your process. I just want to know where and how it fits with your god given rights.

snicker, snicker....I knew I read that toothpick story somewhere...snicker, snicker...



-squirrels

[goldphoenix]

I have to admit that I think there might be a little something to this technique.



I don't totally understand what all Hakeem wrote there (or copied), as I skimmed over it pretty fast, however, I do remember the way the judge reacted when I started to go that route.



His answers to the questions were all "No" which surprised me (I was already shaking in my shoes as I've never enjoyed being in court, probably because I've had no good experiences there, so I didn't expect this one to go well either, and as it ended up, it didn't end up a "win"...on that day).



He did give me his name. He, however, silenced the attorney when the attorney objected and wanted to speak up.



I then went off the script and asked if he knew of anyone who had a claim against "the person charged" and he jumped right into his paperwork and claimed the STATE had a claim against "the person charged." The judge appeared to know what I was doing, and wanted nothing to do with it until I brought up the "person."



After I got off "script" the judge told me I wasn't being "charged" criminally. That threw me, so perhaps the "script" was out of place (the hearing was for the registration of a foreign support order).



Or he was testing me to see how much I understood what I was doing. Thanks, Hakeem, for posting the explanation.



Peace,



Paul

Paul,



Stay on point with the "foreign support order" and you shall overcome.



I think that "all" of you folks here are letting a very important "win-win" strategy fall behind in past post(s), so I will go back and bring up the threads and see if any that still have eyes to see and ears to hear???

Wayne, am most curious, as a new member of the forum, what you are referring to as a "win-win" strategy? Thank you in advance for any reply.



eric

quest:



Just... "any reply"?



I do hope that you read the threads on this page and already found the answer to your question...?



If not, email me at my private email, as we are having a quick refresher course, and I am sure that the others may let you slide into the discussion...?