Notice And Demand Court Take Judicial Notice

[KITCHIE]

This is a little taste of what I did to the judge in the Household Auto case. I filed this and two days later (before the other attorney was served) he filed a motion for Summary judgement. To date the court has been silent.

IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, WASHOE COUNTY



HOUSEHOLD AUTO FINANCE
]
Plaintiff
]
vs ] Case No. CV05-00637 ] Dept. No I Katherine Elizabeth Snedigar ]
Defendant/Counterclaimant ]
]
vs ]
]
]
HOUSEHOLD AUTO FINANCE ]
BAKER COLLECTION COUNSELOR ] NOTICE AND DEMAND THIS
GERALD A. PHILLIPS, ESQ ] COURT TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE
THE LAW FIRM OF PHILLIPS, HARPER AND ]
HARPER, AMERICAN ALLIANCE OF ]
CREDITOR ATTORNEYS et al ]
MACHELLE BOMENKA NOTARY ]
Commission # 1508176 ]
GLOBAL ACCEPTANCE CREDIT ]
CORPORATION et al ]
jointly and Individually
Counterdefendants ]

The Court is sworn by its oath of office under which it sits to uphold the Constitution and to grant fair and impartial consideration to all claims and to know nothing in this case except fact in evidence proven before it.
Snedigar hereby demands this Court take judicial notice on the following statements of fact filed in this Court, under penalty of perjury.
STATEMENT OF FACT I
SNEDIGAR’S STATUS
Judge Berry is profoundly incorrect by Judge Berry recasting Snedigar’s status of appearance. Snedigar has never appeared Pro se or in Proper Person. Snedigar throughout all her filings Motions and Pleadings has always appeared Specially and not Generally, in Propria Personnae and Sui juris, in my own person, one not under or for another. Snedigar has never agreed to appear as the FICTION known as SNEDIGAR (Pro se) nor as a suitable substitute for SNEDIGAR (Proper person) and hereby demands Judge Berry recognize Snedigar as declared in Snedigar’s motions and pleadings, in Propria Personnae and Sui juris, a human woman. Snedigar spelled out the exact definitions of Pro se and in Propria Personnae. Snedigar now notices Judge Berry that Katherine-Elizabeth: Snedigar is not a suitable stand in for KATHERINE SNEDIGAR, as was recast by Judge Berry. Snedigar demands Judge Berry recognize Snedigar as declared in Snedigar’s motions and pleadings. See your ORDER page 2 line 2.
STATEMENT OF FACT II
SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
Snedigar agrees with the Court page 2 line 17: Summary judgment “shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
Snedigar reminds Judge Berry that in Miller v. Jones, 114 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 136, December 29, 1998 the Supreme Court of the State of Nevada referred to Bulbman, Inc. v. Nevada Bell where it was stated; While we construe the pleadings and proof in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, that party is not entitled to build its case on "gossamer threads of whimsy, speculation, and conjecture." Id. We review orders granting summary judgment de novo. Bulbman, Inc. v. Nevada Bell, 108 Nev. 105, 110, 825 P.2

If anyone is interested in what I filed in this case I will be happy to provide.

Kitchie

[idknow]

Originally Posted by KITCHIE

This is a little taste of what I did to the judge in the Household Auto case. I filed this and two days later (before the other attorney was served) he filed a motion for Summary judgement. To date the court has been silent.

IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, WASHOE COUNTY



HOUSEHOLD AUTO FINANCE
]
Plaintiff
]
vs ] Case No. CV05-00637 ] Dept. No I Katherine Elizabeth Snedigar ]
Defendant/Counterclaimant ]
]
vs ]
]
]
HOUSEHOLD AUTO FINANCE ]
BAKER COLLECTION COUNSELOR ] NOTICE AND DEMAND THIS
GERALD A. PHILLIPS, ESQ ] COURT TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE
THE LAW FIRM OF PHILLIPS, HARPER AND ]
HARPER, AMERICAN ALLIANCE OF ]
CREDITOR ATTORNEYS et al ]
MACHELLE BOMENKA NOTARY ]
Commission # 1508176 ]
GLOBAL ACCEPTANCE CREDIT ]
CORPORATION et al ]
jointly and Individually
Counterdefendants ]

The Court is sworn by its oath of office under which it sits to uphold the Constitution and to grant fair and impartial consideration to all claims and to know nothing in this case except fact in evidence proven before it.
Snedigar hereby demands this Court take judicial notice on the following statements of fact filed in this Court, under penalty of perjury.
STATEMENT OF FACT I
SNEDIGAR*S STATUS
Judge Berry is profoundly incorrect by Judge Berry recasting Snedigar*s status of appearance. Snedigar has never appeared Pro se or in Proper Person. Snedigar throughout all her filings Motions and Pleadings has always appeared Specially and not Generally, in Propria Personnae and Sui juris, in my own person, one not under or for another. Snedigar has never agreed to appear as the FICTION known as SNEDIGAR (Pro se) nor as a suitable substitute for SNEDIGAR (Proper person) and hereby demands Judge Berry recognize Snedigar as declared in Snedigar*s motions and pleadings, in Propria Personnae and Sui juris, a human woman. Snedigar spelled out the exact definitions of Pro se and in Propria Personnae. Snedigar now notices Judge Berry that Katherine-Elizabeth: Snedigar is not a suitable stand in for KATHERINE SNEDIGAR, as was recast by Judge Berry. Snedigar demands Judge Berry recognize Snedigar as declared in Snedigar*s motions and pleadings. See your ORDER page 2 line 2.
STATEMENT OF FACT II
SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
Snedigar agrees with the Court page 2 line 17: Summary judgment *shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
Snedigar reminds Judge Berry that in Miller v. Jones, 114 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 136, December 29, 1998 the Supreme Court of the State of Nevada referred to Bulbman, Inc. v. Nevada Bell where it was stated; While we construe the pleadings and proof in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, that party is not entitled to build its case on "gossamer threads of whimsy, speculation, and conjecture." Id. We review orders granting summary judgment de novo. Bulbman, Inc. v. Nevada Bell, 108 Nev. 105, 110, 825 P.2

If anyone is interested in what I filed in this case I will be happy to provide.

Kitchie

--

(re title, with apologies to the author of the book, _Text, Context, Hypertext_)

I'd like to notice to all that WE are not lawyers and
We should definately refrain from writing like them.

They do not obey the Rules of Grammar of the King's English;
we do.

They write Lawyerese/legalese which they spend years to larn in twisted schools,

We are taught from Kindergarten the proper use and "deployment" of the King's English.

Let us also be mindful that we should endeavour to write God's word or TheTruth in our documents, we are not twisters nor are we wicked.

and this is our way of remaining in Honor which is one of our Godly names.

[KITCHIE]

I am pretty sure that WE know we are not lawyers.

I am pretty sure that most everyone here knows we ARE in commerce in EVERYTHING we do every day.

In a business court like the Second Judicial District Court here in Nevada the judges NEVER play by the rules.

The Twister of the Truth Gerry Phillips has committed a fraud upon the court claiming HAF is his client and has not produced one tangible bit of evidence on the record that I have "breeched the contract".

My claim is there are major violations of the FDCPA. The end result of this is going to be that I am going to be taking out a boil on society who has arms and legs in (so far) 5 states.

Collect America has tried and failed to steal my automobile on 5 seperate occations.

Household Auto Finance charged off the debt over a year ago. It sat that way for 5 months that way.

In maritime law, ships that come across abandoned ships have salvage rights. If anyone watched CSI Miami this fact was part of the show.

So when debt collectors surf the CRA's they look for abandoned debts and jump on them.

The LAW has nothing to do with what happens in court. And when I go to court I am NEVER a juristic person. I am God's creation and that is how I behave.

I have been to court (or delt with the police) 4 times and in every case I won. It's all about commerce and contracts, and if you can't write paper in that light you are going to loose.

The court rules are a contract.

Kitchie

[idknow]

Kitchie, I hope you understand that I wasn't critiquing the content of your complaint; I merely wanted to note that lawyer's have a style of writing and so also do we as sovereigns and son.

that's all.

[masterduke]

Kitchie you are great! What a refreshing take on the theives and liers not winning every time!!!! I hope you trounce them. I am going to go back to school and get my degree in Law and become a Consumer Advocate. Just so I will be able to help others in their dealings with these debt buyers, both collection agencys as well as the debt attorneys. I can hardly wait!

[KITCHIE]

Hey id-

I was thinking about your lawyereeze/legaleeze comment. In one of the filings of the corrupt attorney Gerry Phillips, he stated that I had filed fugitive papers. Well needless to say my first reaction was "I am not running from anything!" However when I looked up the definition of fugitive in my lil ol Websters College Dictionary, I discovered that fugitive papers are writings in which one has a "Temporary interest in something."

Boy howdy was it fun to throw that back at him stating in my brief "fugitive filings have been perpatrated PHILLIPS as his temporary interest is that of capital gain."

I really do have a good time throwing their crap back at them.

Kitchie

[masterduke]

AWESOME!!!!!!!! Boy I can see the slob now... Steam venting out of his ears, and probably calling his "buddy", the black sheeted crook, conspiring like busy little bees, trying to come up some way to spew some gibberish/law/caselaw, to counter your statement.

[Livefire]

Kitchie,

If you have a DBA like Jerseee and a few others here have on file....Thats one helluva punch that doc delivers!

Idknow,
I will point out that kitchie isnt writing like a lawyer at all. They "pray" to the black robed "god" on the bench for relief in their briefs (read a lawyers motion for summary judgment sometime!) Her briefs would get an attorney sanctioned real quick!

[Livefire]

masterduke,
I have thought the same thing. Either get paralegal training or go ahead and get a law degree. I'd even take the bar exam just to prove I can cut the mustard to BB. Then I'd tell 'em to stick their oath up their proverbial arses....of course after I barbequed it in molasses!

A lawyer can only do so much......cuz as an officer of the court, he/she is beholden to it and the court serves BB and the banks! But a law degree entered into the record would be proof of competency.

[idknow]

Originally Posted by KITCHIE

Hey id-

I was thinking about your lawyereeze/legaleeze comment. In one of the filings of the corrupt attorney Gerry Phillips, he stated that I had filed fugitive papers. Well needless to say my first reaction was "I am not running from anything!" However when I looked up the definition of fugitive in my lil ol Websters College Dictionary, I discovered that fugitive papers are writings in which one has a "Temporary interest in something."

Boy howdy was it fun to throw that back at him stating in my brief "fugitive filings have been perpatrated PHILLIPS as his temporary interest is that of capital gain."

I really do have a good time throwing their crap back at them.

Kitchie

--
LOL fugitive! that's awesome!