Court Discuss the tactics used by the court system, and how to develop your counter-tactics for success in the courtroom, dealing with citations, criminal and civil matters.


Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > Court
Collateral Attack on Court language = foreign law Collateral Attack on Court language = foreign law
User Name
Password

View Poll Results: Change Jurisprudence from Roman Law to American law, Valid argument?
Agree argument valid. 3 60.00%
Disagree argument valid. 0 0%
Argument to draconian. 0 0%
No validity in argument? 2 40.00%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 5. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 02-04-2006, 08:12 AM
Gary Okupant Gary Okupant is offline
Waking Up
  
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 25
Send a message via ICQ to Gary Okupant Send a message via AIM to Gary Okupant Send a message via Yahoo to Gary Okupant
Collateral Attack on Court language = foreign law
Okay;
This is simple.

Jurisdiction (def.), is Roman Law procedures. The language is latin.

I do not speak Latin; therefore the court must provide
an interpreter; lawyer. Not only pronounciation but definition; an interpreter does not know law!

Constitution is English: Rules of law Roman.
Why not Summerian!, as the Summerian's invented
law; and therefore; starie decisis, would go to Summerian law, not stop at Roman.

Decisions must be on Constitution; and to proceed under Roman law and language; is using foreign law; not Constitutional law.

Law procedures; must be changed to Constitutional reference; and language. ie simplified! Its all about the
Constitution idiot!

This is the premise.

It's not really complicated but it does have import and impact!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-04-2006, 08:18 AM
Judge Roy Bean's Avatar
Judge Roy Bean Judge Roy Bean is offline
Mental Jujitsu
  
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 901
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Okupant
Okay;
This is simple.
No, Gary, this is meaningless.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Okupant
Jurisdiction (def.), is Roman Law procedures. The language is latin.

I do not speak Latin; therefore the court must provide
an interpreter; lawyer. Not only pronounciation but definition; an interpreter does not know law!

Constitution is English: Rules of law Roman.
Why not Summerian!, as the Summerian's invented
law; and therefore; starie decisis, would go to Summerian law, not stop at Roman.
Why stop there? Why not just move even further back to the law of the jungle?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Okupant
Decisions must be on Constitution; and to proceed under Roman law and language; is using foreign law; not Constitutional law.

Law procedures; must be changed to Constitutional reference; and language. ie simplified! Its all about the
Constitution idiot!

This is the premise.

It's not really complicated but it does have import and impact!
Start a business. See how many people will buy off on it. Hint: Don't invest heavily.
__________________
The Honorable Judge Roy Bean
Creditoris Squaliformes
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-04-2006, 09:10 AM
Gary Okupant Gary Okupant is offline
Waking Up
  
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 25
Send a message via ICQ to Gary Okupant Send a message via AIM to Gary Okupant Send a message via Yahoo to Gary Okupant
Who said law of Jungle?
I haven't said dismiss law. I have said;
Constitutional law, US and State.
Is that NOT the law?
If all other law is agency, procedural for efficient
movement and organization of people(judicial efficiency), then when the agency really takes away
Constitutional rights, inalienalbe by God; then
why is this not the question to ask?

It seems only Equitable to ask of such; as our law
is Equitable law; yet seldom confronted as such(comment of Supreme Court Justice 1800;s).

So I respect your comment; but don't understand the base.

Nicholi Tesla; harvested in 1918 electricity from Ground
and gave it away for free in NY, city. His building is still there; as are the newspaper reports of him doing it.

NOW, you may agree, disagree, deny! It is fact.

You have given me; Evolution is; therefore I'm nuts to
disagree. Thats like saying the Constituion and law, in which man, "WE THE PEOPLE" deriving our rights from the diety, of GOD!, and Pray for relief, can't then use the word God or Pray. Am I misunderstand here this
point?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Judge Roy Bean
No, Gary, this is meaningless.


Why stop there? Why not just move even further back to the law of the jungle?


Start a business. See how many people will buy off on it. Hint: Don't invest heavily.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-05-2006, 09:17 AM
georgealexander georgealexander is offline
Unplugged
  
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 113
'Judge' Roy Bean of Arizona....
.....was a cheat, liar and a thief therefore lived by the law of the jungle......

Such folks bear listening to.

George Alexander
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-05-2006, 10:20 AM
idknow idknow is offline
Banned User
  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Okupant
Okay;
This is simple.

Jurisdiction (def.), is Roman Law procedures. The language is latin.

I do not speak Latin; therefore the court must provide
an interpreter; lawyer. Not only pronounciation but definition; an interpreter does not know law!

Constitution is English: Rules of law Roman.
Why not Summerian!, as the Summerian's invented
law; and therefore; starie decisis, would go to Summerian law, not stop at Roman.

Decisions must be on Constitution; and to proceed under Roman law and language; is using foreign law; not Constitutional law.

Law procedures; must be changed to Constitutional reference; and language. ie simplified! Its all about the
Constitution idiot!

This is the premise.

It's not really complicated but it does have import and impact!

This is very interesting but i need a little time to process it... keep going, Gary

It could be implied from the constitution thta the Language of the Land is English because that is the language in which the founding do***ents were written in; and, as I recall, there was a consideration of making Hebrew the primary language back during the nation's founding.
__________________
I claim ownership of and accept responsibility for every word I have written; I cannot claim ownership for any quotes I have made, being the words of whomever I quoted, to whom I say `thank you'.
Last edited by idknow : 02-05-2006 at 10:21 AM. Reason: more
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-05-2006, 01:15 PM
joseph sugarman joseph sugarman is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
  
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 375
Court language
Congratulations, This thread represents the most convoluted thought process I have yet to encounter in a universe of convoluted thought. Joseph Sugarman, design@dream-home.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-05-2006, 01:21 PM
idknow idknow is offline
Banned User
  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by joseph sugarman
Congratulations, This thread represents the most convoluted thought process I have yet to encounter in a universe of convoluted thought. Joseph Sugarman, design@dream-home.com

You're very welcome, we aim to please (grin)
__________________
I claim ownership of and accept responsibility for every word I have written; I cannot claim ownership for any quotes I have made, being the words of whomever I quoted, to whom I say `thank you'.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-05-2006, 05:19 PM
joseph sugarman joseph sugarman is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
  
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 375
Quote:
Originally Posted by idknow
You're very welcome, we aim to please (grin)

Thank you vurry much. Joseph Sugarman, design@dream-home.com
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-05-2006, 08:39 PM
charlesa6's Avatar
charlesa6 charlesa6 is offline
Come and Get Some!
  
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Illinois(chi-town)
Posts: 5,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by joseph sugarman
Congratulations, This thread represents the most convoluted thought process I have yet to encounter in a universe of convoluted thought. Joseph Sugarman, design@dream-home.com
I am glad you embrace it.
__________________
Resolution pending
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-06-2006, 04:02 AM
idknow idknow is offline
Banned User
  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by charlesa6
I am glad you embrace it.

have we concluded the ``Obligatory Congratulations Hour'' Yet? baha
__________________
I claim ownership of and accept responsibility for every word I have written; I cannot claim ownership for any quotes I have made, being the words of whomever I quoted, to whom I say `thank you'.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Citizenship/Jurisdiction Cites suijuris Citizenship & Jurisdiction 91 01-18-2008 04:37 PM
Law is not contract rushpat Citizenship & Jurisdiction 20 12-19-2007 07:15 PM
Common law judgment kgod999 Court 18 12-13-2005 08:03 AM
Anyone have Lexis? HenryBowman Misc. Discussion 34 10-21-2004 10:14 AM
Debt Attorney/Collection Agency gregtu Court 2 09-21-2004 09:13 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:33 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2008 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer