CourtDiscuss the tactics used by the court system, and how to develop your counter-tactics for success in the courtroom, dealing with citations, criminal and civil matters.
Between email, suitors' broadcasts and the repository I found a wonderful way to express the resignation of judiciary, as I call it. I have expressed the fact explicitly and had the district court clerk plead for me to remove the Resignation of Judiciary from the public record. The pleading was denied.
It is probably better to believe Congress than my verbiage anyway.
I of course tried turning the page by plugging in "...420.gif" and that link failed. So I went to the federal repository for myself. [I will remove the images when the links are functioning.]
It is difficult to decide which particular passage is most revealing but I like two Sections. The end of Section 19 says:
Quote:
... and no person holding any office of trust or profit under the government of the United States shall be a member of the legislative assembly.
After revealing that, in Section 11:
Quote:
And be it futher enacted, That bills may originate in either house, but may be altered, amended, or rejected by the other...
So we are supposed to believe that the municipal government for the District of Columbia is anything other than the two houses of Congress itself? Clearly it is forbidden for the Congress to be the municipal houses of legislature talked about. Therefore there is no Congress de jure of the United States - Only its replacement, the municipal corporation governing the District.
Section 31 is very revealing about courts; ergo this thread here:
Quote:
That the governor, secretary, and other officers to be appointed pursuant to this act, shall, before they act as such, respectively, take and subscribe an oath or affirmation before a judge of the supreme court of the District of Columbia, or some justice of the peace in the limits of said District...
... and all civil officers in said District, before they act as such, shall take and subscribe a like oath or affirmation before the said governor or secretary, or some judge or justice of the peace of the District, who may be duly commissioned and qualified, or before the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, which said oath or affirmation shall be certified and transmitted...
This brings forth into the light that the "one supreme court" mentioned in the Constitution is not the Supreme Court of the United States unless and until the judiciary of Article III has failed formation by the people of the community, township, parish, Frank Pledge (ten families) etc., or in this case, the local municipal corporation home rule - city of Washington, District of Columbia corporation/METRO.
Regards,
David Merrill.
Last edited by David Merrill : 02-13-2006 at 09:02 PM.
Reason: add images
Between email, suitors' broadcasts and the repository I found a wonderful way to express the resignation of judiciary, as I call it. I have expressed the fact explicitly and had the district court clerk plead for me to remove the Resignation of Judiciary from the public record. The pleading was denied.
It is probably better to believe Congress than my verbiage anyway.
I of course tried turning the page by plugging in "...420.gif" and that link failed. So I went to the federal repository for myself. [I will remove the images when the links are functioning.]
It is difficult to decide which particular passage is most revealing but I like two Sections. The end of Section 19 says:
After revealing that, in Section 11:
So we are supposed to believe that the municipal government for the District of Columbia is anything other than the two houses of Congress itself? Clearly it is forbidden for the Congress to be the municipal houses of legislature talked about. Therefore there is no Congress de jure of the United States - Only its replacement, the municipal corporation governing the District.
Section 31 is very revealing about courts; ergo this thread here:
This brings forth into the light that the "one supreme court" mentioned in the Constitution is not the Supreme Court of the United States unless and until the judiciary of Article III has failed formation by the people of the community, township, parish, Frank Pledge (ten families) etc., or in this case, the local municipal corporation home rule - city of Washington, District of Columbia corporation/METRO.
Regards,
David Merrill.
excellent david!
truly enlightening
So, what's to stop a properly educated man or woman, elected as senator to the D.C. by educating the legislature of his state to properly elect HIM to the office after he's been elected by the people?
__________________
I claim ownership of and accept responsibility for every word I have written; I cannot claim ownership for any quotes I have made, being the words of whomever I quoted, to whom I say `thank you'.
Rather than ask ...what is to stop...?, I feel you should be asking what would the purpose of that be?
Next I should enlighten the reader about the State of Colorado corporation as formed under the District corporation of 1871. Read Eric's treatise:
Quote:
In 1968, at the National Governor's Conference in Lexington, Kentucky, the IMF leaders of the event proposed the dilemma the State governors were in for carrying out their business dealings in Federal Reserve Notes (foreign notes), which is forbidden in the national and State constitutions, alleging that if they did not do something to protect themselves the people would discover what had been done with their money and would likely to kill them all and start over. They suggested the States form corporations like Corp. U.S. and showed the advantages of the resultant uniform codes that could be created, which would allow better and more powerful control over the people, which thing the original jurisdiction governments of this nation had no capacity to do. Our Constitutions secure that the governments do not govern the people rather they govern themselves in accord with the limits of Law. The people govern themselves. Such is the foundational nature of our Constitutional Republic.
15th: By 1971, every State government in the union of States had formed such private corporations (Corp. State), in accord with the IMF admonition, and the people ceased to seat original jurisdiction government officials in their State government seats.
See the attached images. These documents were presented to me by We the People (a branch) and the offices are in the same building as the Attorney General for the State of Colorado. I believe it true but have not actually found out if there is a "State of Colorado" corporation formed under Condaleeza Rice (Secretary of State for the municipal District corporation) or the State corporation is registered as State of Colorado Capital Investment Corporation.
David: I am certain that you have noticed, but this is intended for the edification of those who did not notice. On the first of the images you have at the bottom of the page, immediately following your "xxx" notation, is an interesting comment, "Powers to be limited to the district".
Does this imply that the powers of the DC are limited strictly to that geographical area?
There are three definitions for United States in Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition. Of those three I believe it is obvious the Ten Miles Square is applicable to the district in the Act. Just the same, that is a good point to bring forth.
The subcorporations are also limited to that domain.
That domain is not even territorial.* The home rule properties owned by municipal corporations are limited to things like parking lots for City vehicles, Memorial Hospital - the local city owned hospital etc. The roads are not in the City of Colorado Springs/METRO. I am not at the moment in the City of Colorado Springs (albeit I entertain no illusions I could convince an angry cop of that). The Freemasons have a jurisdiction over Colorado. I am not in the Masons so I am not in that jurisdiction as well.
* The Ten Miles Square is territorial but the corporation created in 1871 is not that same thing. The Constitution was defining the land by body politic of the People. The municipality was later created by a Congress that operated under the 'extraordinary occasion' clause since July 4, 1861 and at that time had been adjourned sine die for 90 days since March 28.
It is noteworthy the exclusive wording I pointed out. No member of Congress is allowed to be for the United States (as most people perceive it) and the houses of the municipal district as created by the Act.
P.S. A sanitized email from a while back:
Quote:
---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: RE: Corporation by filing number
From: "Troubetaris Mickie \(DOS\)" <Mickie.Pisarski@state.de.us> Date:
Mon, May 16, 2005 6:59 am
To: XXX@XXX.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you for your email, you may contact our General Information and
provide them with the corporate file number. Also I provided the
information with regards to this file number off of our website. If you
would like to check corporate status you may do so by calling our
General Information section. They can be reached at 302-739-3073. There
is a fee of 10 dollars for status.
Entity Details
File Number: 2193946 Incorporation Date / Formation Date: 04/19/1989
(mm/dd/yyyy)
Entity Name: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC.
Entity Kind: CORPORATION
Entity Type: RELIGIOUS NONPROFIT
Residency: DOMESTIC State: DE
REGISTERED AGENT INFORMATION
Name: THE COMPANY CORPORATION
Address: 2711 CENTERVILLE ROAD SUITE 400
City: WILMINGTON County: NEW CASTLE
State: DE Postal Code: 19808
Phone: (302)636-5440
Delaware Division of Corporations
John G. Townsend Building
401 Federal Street - Suite 4
Dover, DE 19901
Ph# 302/739-3073
Fax# 302/739-3812
email - DOSDOC_Webmaster@state.de.us
-----Original Message-----
From: Legal Name, Ph.D., Th.D. [mailto:XXX@XXX.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 8:21 PM
To: DOSDOC WEB (DOS)
Subject: Corporation by filing number
Greetings:
I would like to know how I may access information regarding a corporation by filing/reception number. The filing/reception number is: 2193946
Thank you for your assistance.
Legal Name, Ph.D., Th.D.
XXX University Blvd., Ste. 124
Denver, CO 80XX6
Last edited by David Merrill : 02-14-2006 at 05:59 AM.
Reason: add images
Perhaps some light should be shed upon the suspension of writs (habeas corpus and mandamus) in the actual theater of war through the appeal process, which would of course be a sanction upon commerce. See the attachments from the United States Codes.
Somebody threatening the future of a bond/security with a notice of appeal would be attempting to remove the vessel FIRST MIDDLE LAST from its secured place in dry-dock where foreign investors may bargain and float securities and bonds upon the presumed conviction. That further secures the vessel by applied laws of forfeiture; the fringes are admiralty.
Quote:
In case of any vessel which is detained by virtue of this subchapter shall depart or attempt to depart from the jurisdiction of the United States without clearance or other lawful authority, the owner or master or person or persons having charge or command of such vessel [First Middle Last/legal or full name] shall be severally liable for a fine... and in addition such vessel shall be forfeited to the United States.
See the Expatriation Act attached - clearance or lawful authority to depart from the District United States - shall depart or attempt to depart from the jurisdiction of the United States
Please tell us all about yourself.
Your "patriot nutjob" theories expose you.
The U.S.A is alive and well.
It is not a mere municipal corporation.
You have confused yourself. You are thinking of the District of Columbia.
"In the criminal justice system, the people are represented by two separate, yet equally important, groups: the police, who investigate crime, and the district attorneys who prosecute the offenders. These are their stories."
In the criminal justice system, defendants are represented by two completely different types of lawyer: Group 1 is typified by the Public Defenders who never write anything, exist to make deals, and are obsequious members of the state bar. Of group 2 there is only 1: Lawyerdude is the New Paradigm, a prolific multi-jurisdictional computer/ internet-driven lawyer who has passed the bar exam and refuses to let the bar infringe on his 1st and 6th amendment rights! This super defender sees state bars as burdens on interstate commerce. He wins cases without going to court! His is the only profession listed in the U.S. constitution. His mandate supervenes mere state statutes! These are his stories. http://www.circuitlawyer.8m.com/traffic.html
Between email, suitors' broadcasts and the repository I found a wonderful way to express the resignation of judiciary, as I call it. I have expressed the fact explicitly and had the district court clerk plead for me to remove the Resignation of Judiciary from the public record. The pleading was denied. ...
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
I had come across the notion that the parliamentary body or what-have-you in D.C. / Mary-land acted in two capacities:
1) As municipal council for the City of Washington, District of Columbia.
2) As "The United States of America" (i.e. congress).
But/and syntax might have been seditiously applied so as to obfuscate and confuse as to when acting as which and/or if one was acting or existing with or without the other.
__________________
All rights reserved. No Liability Assumed. No Value Assured. Without Recourse. Private. Not for hire.
Last edited by fulltitle : 02-17-2006 at 06:42 AM.
The U.S.A is alive and well. It is not a mere municipal corporation.
You have confused yourself. You are thinking of the District of Columbia.
Did he mention "United States of America" or "United States"?
Quote:
In the criminal justice system, defendants are represented by two completely different types of lawyer: Group 1 is typified by the Public Defenders who never write anything, exist to make deals, and are obsequious members of the state bar.
Obsequious to and for whom?
Quote:
Of group 2 there is only 1: Lawyerdude is the New Paradigm, a prolific multi-jurisdictional computer/ internet-driven
What does it mean to be .."internet driven"?
Quote:
lawyer who has passed the bar exam and refuses to let the bar infringe on his 1st and 6th amendment rights!
Does the bar-chartered, 'attorney-member-entity' have any 1st and 6th amendment rights? [Just a something to ponder...no need to get offended.]
Quote:
This super defender sees state bars as burdens on interstate commerce.
Might the act of attorning necessarily and intrinsically be international in nature?
Quote:
He wins cases without going to court!
Who would recommend going to their courts?
Quote:
His is the only profession listed in the U.S. constitution.
Please clarify as to your perspective.
Quote:
His mandate supervenes mere state statutes! These are his stories.
LawyerDude is a Quatloser. He has no respect over there because he is a disbarred attorney. However he seems to hold onto that dream. I imagine the tuition paid is what keeps him going.
You can consider him an attorney in his style; for instance he would rather hear about me than consider the facts that I have laid out from the Statutes at Large and Congressional Records etc. That is the slippery tactic of (mis)directing the Readers' attention to subjective items and away from the pragmatic facts of history.
Fulltitle mentions:
Quote:
I had come across the notion that the parliamentary body or what-have-you in D.C. / Mary-land acted in two capacities:
1) As municipal council for the City of Washington, District of Columbia.
2) As "The United States of America" (i.e. congress).
But/and syntax might have been seditiously applied so as to obfuscate and confuse as to when acting as which and/or if one was acting or existing with or without the other.
The latter, 2) may be considered action only under the extraordinary occasion declared on July 4, 1861 and even then Congress never got out of the Ten Miles Square (and enclaves) of Article I of the Constitution. However citizens of the United States reside out here in the States.
