Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > Court
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-12-2008, 07:25 PM
quasimodo's Avatar
quasimodo quasimodo is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Are there States?
Posts: 135
The Late Great Writ - Habeas Corpus

From Ralph Winterrowd,

Quote:
I will be posting on this issue this week, but the research now proves it seems that the Great Writ is only available after you have played in the Administrative world with Motions to Dismiss prior to a trial (no Habeas Corpus), then the 2255 AFTER sentencing with one shot with the 2255 MOTION with second shots using 2255's Motion extremely limited. THEN, and ONLY THEN with very extremely limited controlled situations after the 2255(s), you MIGHT get PERMISSION get to file a real Habeas Corpus ad subjiciendum.
This is beyond Treason by Congress and the President of the United States if true as I see now. Been testing and this follows unfortunately. This was implemented in 1948 with the new USDC that exercises no judicial Power of the United States and there is no provision in the Federal Constitution for any such court (USDC) in the several States.
Later
Ralph

Chief Justice Marshall, in the course of the debates of the Virginia State Convention of 1829--1830 (pp. 616, 619), used the following strong and frequently quoted language:
'The Judicial Department comes home in its effects to every man's fireside; it passes on his property, his reputation, his life, his all. Is it not, to the last degree important, that he should be rendered perfectly and completely independent, with nothing to influence or control him but God and his conscience? * * * I have always thought, from my earliest youth till now, that the greatest scourge an angry Heaven ever inflicted upon an ungrateful and a sinning people, was an ignorant, a corrupt, or a dependent Judiciary.'
In a very early period of our history, it was said, in words as true to-day as they were then, that 'if they (the people) value and wish to preserve their Constitution, they ought never to surrender the independence of their judges.' O'Donoghue v. United States, 289 U.S. 516, 532 (1933).
Notice: I am not a counsellor-at- law or attorney. All research materials provided are for you to check out and use at your discretion, and is protected under the right of free speech in all forms. I neither suggest that people file an Individual Income Tax Return or not file - that is a personal choice for each man/woman.
There are three lists that may be joined by the home page of www.jusbelli. com. There is a special e-mail list for $120 per year donation that includes attachments - contact me via e-mail to join. Requires a minimum of 5 meg. of e-mail storage by your server.
I have a talk show on Republic Broadcasting accessible by going to
http://republicbroa dcasting. org/ The show will be on Sundays (6PM - 8 PM CT). Call in is 1-800-313-9443.
Ralph
__________________
"SALUS POPULI SUPREMA LEX ESTO" "Let the good of the People be the Supreme Law" JOHN LOCKE
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Writs of Habeas Corpus kgod999 Court 52 Yesterday 09:52 PM
Habeas Corpus - The Most Extraordinary Writ Admin Articles & News 3 09-23-2007 06:59 PM
Gonzales Question Habeas Corpus charlesa6 Office of Information Retrieval 5 01-20-2007 02:07 PM
Habeas corpus? ZOBOLI Court 8 01-17-2007 07:34 PM
Military Habeas Corpus I & II fulltitle End Days of America 0 10-19-2006 01:24 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:12 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2007 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer