Never Go To Court Alone

[KITCHIE]

Well I went to Sparks Municipal court yesterday to challange jurisdiction. I was there as a special restricted appearance. I had five witnesses with me.

I had submitted a formal letter to the court for the matter to be removed from the court calendar until after the Admin Remedy was completed.

March 24, 2006

Sparks Municipal Court Clerk and Judge
CITY OF SPARKS MUNICIPAL COURT
1540 C Street
Sparks, Nevada 89431


FORMAL NOTICE OF LACK OF JURISDICTION AND DEMAND FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

This is your formal notice that your court does not have jurisdiction in the matter of Citation Number S16706087758 issued on March 7, 2006 by a person claiming to be OFFICER / COMPLAINANT CARTER identification number 7758. On that citation, OFFICER / COMPLAINANT CARTER identification number 7758 wrote down that I had to be in your court on March 27, 2006 at 8:00 a.m. You are hereby advised to clear this entry off your calendar to keep you from making a severe mistake since I will be utilizing my administrative remedies past that date.

A copy of my DEMAND FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES to the Department of Motor Vehicles is attached hereto for your edification. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Department of Motor Vehicles. Any attempt on your part to try to assert jurisdiction without proving jurisdiction will be treated as the criminal act of trespass that the District and Supreme Courts have labeled such activities to be.

I am thanking you in advance for your expected cooperation in this matter.

Without prejudice UCC 1-308


________________________________
Katherine-Elizabeth: Snedigar
c/o 4400 Pasture View Road
Reno, [89510] Nevada state



INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT


STATE OF NEVADA )
) ss
COUNTY OF WASHOE )

Before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State on this 24th day of March 2006, Katherine Elizabeth: Snedigar personally appeared and made herself known to me to be the identical individual who asseverated to the facts, under oath, and executed the FORMAL NOTICE OF LACK OF JURISDICTION AND DEMAND FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES
and she acknowledged to me that she executed the same as her free and voluntary act.


__________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC
Seal
__________________________
My commission expires:


Also was a copy of the letter I sent to DMV for the hearing.

I told the pro-tem hed did not have my permission to appear before me because he lacked jurisdiction and I have filed a notice and demand for admin remedy and he a made little remark like well else am I supposed to be, and the other victims laugh.

He says so how do you want to plea:

I say you don't have jurisdiction so I can't plea.

He say Then I will enter a plea for you of not guilty

I say you don't have jurisdiction you cannot enter a plea for me.

I say If you contine this matter you are knowigly willingly and wantingly denying my right to due process.

He say count one expired registration (does not cite the SMC for an of my criminal acts) not guilty.

I say I object

He say so noted.

He say count two speeding in a school zone

I say I object for lack of jurisdiction.

He say so noted

Then I went and got a court date. Oh and the SPD that cited me was there I guess to be sure I showed up.

So my five wonderful witness and the transcripts is going to be very difficult for the stupid former public pretender now pro tem judge just nuked his carreer.

Kitchie

[idknow]

on ward and upward K!!!

[weishaupt1776]

KITCHIE, with all respect justly due, your jurisdictional challenge was related to Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Admin stuff) and a special appearance is only good for inpersonam challenges. Once you go to SMJ, your inpersonam challenges are deemed to have been waived, therefore, you waived your special appearance also. Go to my thread on Inpersonam jurisdiciton

[Skeptic]

So my five wonderful witness and the transcripts is going to be very difficult for the stupid former public pretender now pro tem judge just nuked his carreer.

Kitchie

So, your pseudo-legal gibberish about "lack of juristriction" was simply ignored by the judge and you now must go to trial anyway.

What makes you think new pseudo-legal gibberish you and your five witnesses will write in order to "nuke the judge's career" will be treated any differently?

It, too, will just be ignored, the judge's career will be absolutely unaffected, and, well, that's it.

[Akira]

Kitchie,

PJ is an element of SMJ. So by challenging PJ, you automatically challenge SMJ.

No worries... there is still plenty of time to challenge PJ.


For HIS Glory,
Akira

[BOBT12]

Originally Posted by KITCHIE

Well I went to Sparks Municipal court yesterday to challange jurisdiction. I was there as a special restricted appearance. I had five witnesses with me.

I had submitted a formal letter to the court for the matter to be removed from the court calendar until after the Admin Remedy was completed.

March 24, 2006

Sparks Municipal Court Clerk and Judge
CITY OF SPARKS MUNICIPAL COURT
1540 C Street
Sparks, Nevada 89431


FORMAL NOTICE OF LACK OF JURISDICTION AND DEMAND FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

This is your formal notice that your court does not have jurisdiction in the matter of Citation Number S16706087758 issued on March 7, 2006 by a person claiming to be OFFICER / COMPLAINANT CARTER identification number 7758. On that citation, OFFICER / COMPLAINANT CARTER identification number 7758 wrote down that I had to be in your court on March 27, 2006 at 8:00 a.m. You are hereby advised to clear this entry off your calendar to keep you from making a severe mistake since I will be utilizing my administrative remedies past that date.

A copy of my DEMAND FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES to the Department of Motor Vehicles is attached hereto for your edification. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Department of Motor Vehicles. Any attempt on your part to try to assert jurisdiction without proving jurisdiction will be treated as the criminal act of trespass that the District and Supreme Courts have labeled such activities to be.

I am thanking you in advance for your expected cooperation in this matter.

Without prejudice UCC 1-308


________________________________
Katherine-Elizabeth: Snedigar
c/o 4400 Pasture View Road
Reno, [89510] Nevada state



INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT


STATE OF NEVADA )
) ss
COUNTY OF WASHOE )

Before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State on this 24th day of March 2006, Katherine Elizabeth: Snedigar personally appeared and made herself known to me to be the identical individual who asseverated to the facts, under oath, and executed the FORMAL NOTICE OF LACK OF JURISDICTION AND DEMAND FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES
and she acknowledged to me that she executed the same as her free and voluntary act.


__________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC
Seal
__________________________
My commission expires:


Also was a copy of the letter I sent to DMV for the hearing.

I told the pro-tem hed did not have my permission to appear before me because he lacked jurisdiction and I have filed a notice and demand for admin remedy and he a made little remark like well else am I supposed to be, and the other victims laugh.

He says so how do you want to plea:

I say you don't have jurisdiction so I can't plea.

He say Then I will enter a plea for you of not guilty

I say you don't have jurisdiction you cannot enter a plea for me.

I say If you contine this matter you are knowigly willingly and wantingly denying my right to due process.

He say count one expired registration (does not cite the SMC for an of my criminal acts) not guilty.

I say I object

He say so noted.

He say count two speeding in a school zone

I say I object for lack of jurisdiction.

He say so noted

Then I went and got a court date. Oh and the SPD that cited me was there I guess to be sure I showed up.

So my five wonderful witness and the transcripts is going to be very difficult for the stupid former public pretender now pro tem judge just nuked his carreer.



Kitchie

Originally Posted by BOBT12

This is because traffic court is meaningless, or not a court of record. Traffic court doesn't seem to know its butt from its elbow, they follow whatever rules they want. Geez, JRB, I get the feeling you know nothing about traffic court. Witnesses for the plaintiff don't come to traffic court in my neck of the woods. If there is a serious issue involved, take your issue to a court of record. In my state, the lowest court of record, is Common Pleas Court.

http://www.suijuris.net/forum/travel...t-100-a-9.html

THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Sec: 9. Municipal courts. Provision shall be made by law prescribing the powers[,] duties and responsibilities of any Municipal Court that may be established in pursuance of Section One, of this Article; and also fixing by law the jurisdiction of said Court so as not to conflict with that of the several courts of Record.

Emphasis added.

Kitchie, Municipal court (Community court also, if you have one) is also a court of no record. Once you appeal to a court of record, there will be a new trial, de novo. Thus, whatever the judge did won't matter much, there will be no useful record. Please check your state's constitution, and get an official one from the Secretary of State (SoS). However, like David Merrill, I am finding it more difficult to get them from the SoS.

THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Sec. 8. Number, qualifications, terms of office and jurisdiction of Justices of the Peace; appeals; Courts of Record. The Legislature shall determine the number of Justices of the Peace to be elected in each city and township of the State, and shall fix by law their qualifications, their terms of office and the limits of their civil and criminal jurisdiction, according to the amount in controversy, the nature of the case, the penalty provided, or any combination of these.

The provisions of this section affecting the number, qualifications, terms of office and jurisdiction of Justices of the Peace become effective on the first Monday of January, 1979.

The Legislature shall also prescribe by law the manner, and determine the cases in which appeals may be taken from Justices and other courts. The Supreme Court, the District Courts, and such other Courts, as the Legislature shall designate, shall be Courts of Record.

[Amended in 1978. Proposed and passed by the 1975 Legislature; agreed to and passed by the 1977 Legislature; and approved and ratified by the people at the 1978 General Election. See: Statutes of Nevada 1975, p. 1952; Statutes of Nevada 1977, p. 1691.]

THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Section 1. Judicial power vested in court system. The Judicial power of this State shall be vested in a court system, comprising a Supreme Court, District Courts, and Justices of the Peace. The Legislature may also establish, as part of the system, Courts for municipal purposes only in incorporated cities and towns.

Emphasis added.

http://www.leg.state.nv.us/Const/NVConst.html#Art6

Akira, has some useful information in this area.

[Idoknow]

K -

You must be really proud of yourself. You sped through a school zone without registration. You probably did not have insurance either, meaning that if you hit a child while speeding through that school zone, the child would have been out of luck for having the injuries you caused to the child paid for by you.

You can't even put words together to make an intelligent sentence. What the heck does "[s]o my five wonderful witness and the transcripts is going to be very difficult for the stupid former public pretender now pro tem judge just nuked his carreer[.]" mean?

In what way did any of your asinine actions in court or your ridiculous pleadings accomplish anything related to nuking anyone's career but your own?

[KITCHIE]

Well Idoknow, it appears that in regard to you I am guiltyfor speeding in a school zone with no proof of insurance and no licen plates and registration.


Yes er ree I was hummin along at 15mph in a 15mph school zone, (want to make sure the kiddies get plenty of toxins while they are out at play ya know) when I passed the other people on the road going between 7 and 10 mph was good enough. You are a jerk to make assumptions when you absolutely have no idea of what the facts are. May you go far in life.

Akira thank you very much and you too weis!!! And Akira I will get on that. Thanks again everyone for your input. Even the ignorant people.

Kitchie

[rentiap]

Originally Posted by KITCHIE

Even the ignorant people.

Kitchie

Please!please!! KITCHIE!!! Bite thy tongue.
That would be Ignorant Citizens who have volunteered into servitude!

Not people!
Cheers,
Craig.

[Idoknow]

K - you are trying to stay out of court instead of making the state prove its case against you. As folks in this forum are fond of saying, "where there is smoke, there is fire." I'll take what I said back if you can post a redacted proof of license, registration, and insurance for the day you got the ticket. Go ahead, K, do it, make me a laughting stock.

Yes, I have gone far in life. I have several degrees in areas that have given me financial independence (all paid for by me). I have published extensively. I live in a home (all paid for) that is the envy of all who enter. All of the kids have completed a college degree with no loans. I have a wonderful job that puts me in the top 1% of earners ever year. I have a fabulously smart and sexy spouse that supports me in every effort. I have friends that love and respect me. I have total faith in my God. Yea, you could say I have gone very far.

I've seen the way that people on this form attack those that disagree. I know I will be attacked. It does not matter. Please answer my question.

What the heck does "[s]o my five wonderful witness and the transcripts is going to be very difficult for the stupid former public pretender now pro tem judge just nuked his carreer[.]" mean?

Explain it K. It is complete and total jibberish.