Court Discuss the tactics used by the court system, and how to develop your counter-tactics for success in the courtroom, dealing with citations, criminal and civil matters.


Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > Court
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-18-2004, 12:46 PM
gregtu gregtu is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 823
CONTRACTS

CONTRACT - An agreement between two or more competent parties in which an offer is made and accepted, and each party benefits. The agreement can be formal, informal, written, oral or just plain understood. Some contracts are required to be in writing in order to be enforced. (2) An agreement between two or more parties which creates obligations to do or not do the specific things that are the subject of that agreement. Examples of a contract are a lease, a promissory note, or a rental agreement.



This term, in its more extensive sense, includes every description of agreement, or obligation, whereby one party becomes bound to another to pay a sum of money, or to do or omit to do a certain act; or, a contract is an act which contains a perfect obligation. In its more confined sense, it is an agreement between two or more persons, concerning something to be, done, whereby both parties are hound to each other, or one is bound to the other. Blackstone defines it to be an agreement, upon a sufficient consideration, to do or not to do a particular thing. A contract has also been defined to be a compact between two or more persons.



Contracts are divided into express or implied. An express contract is one where the terms of the agreement are openly uttered and avowed at the time of making, as to pay a stated price for certain goods.



Express contracts are of three sorts: 1. By parol, or in writing, as contradistinguished from specialties. 2. By specialty or under seal. 3. Of record.



A parol contract is defined to be a bargain or voluntary agreement made, either orally or in writing not under seal, upon a good consideration, between two or more persons capable of contracting, to do a lawful act or to omit to do something, the performance whereof is not enjoined by law.



From this definition it appears, that to constitute a sufficient parol agreement, there must be:



1st. The reciprocal or mutual assent of two or more persons competent to contract. Every agreement ought to be so certain and complete, that each party may have an action upon it; and the agreement would be incomplete if either party withheld his assent to any of its terms. The agreement must, in general, be obligatory on both parties, or it binds neither. To this rule there are, however, some exceptions, as in the case of an infant's contract. He may always sue, though he cannot be sued on his contract.



2d. There must be a good and valid consideration, motive or inducement to make the promise upon which a party is charged, for this is of the very essence of a contract under seal and must exist, although the contract be reduced to writing.



3d. There must be a thing to be done, which is not forbidden; or a thing to be omitted, the performance of which is not enjoined by law. A fraudulent or immoral contract, or one contrary to public policy is void.



The second kind of express contracts are specialties, or those which are made under seal, as deeds, bonds, and the like; they are not merely written, but delivered over by the party bound. The solemnity and deliberation with which, on account of the ceremonies to be observed, a deed or bond is presumed to be entered into, attach to it an importance and character which do not belong to a simple contract. In the case of a specially, no consideration is necessary to give it validity, even in a court of equity. When, a contract by specialty has been changed by a parol agreement, the whole of it becomes a parol contract.



The highest kind of express contracts are those of record such as judgments, recognizances of bail, and in England, statutes merchant and staple, and other securities of the same nature, entered into with the intervention of some public authority.



Implied contracts are such as reason and justice dictates, and which, therefore, the law presumes every man undertakes to perform; as if a man employs another to do any business for him or perform any work, the law implies that the former contracted or undertook to pay the latter as much as his labor is worth; or if one takes up goods from a tradesman without any agreement of price, the law concludes that he contracts to pay their value.



Contracts considered in relation to their substance are either commutative or independent, principal or accessory.



Commutative contracts are those in which what is done, given or promised by one party is considered as equivalent to, or in consideration of what is done, given or promised by the other.



Independent contracts are those in which the mutual acts or promises have no relation to each other, either as equivalents or as considerations.



A principal contract is one entered into by both parties, on their accounts, or in the several qualities they assume.



An accessory contract is made for assuring the performance of a prior contract, either by the same parties or by others, such as suretyship, mortgage and pledges.



Contracts, considered in relation to the motive for making them, are either gratuitous or onerous. To be gratuitous the object of a contract must be to benefit the person with whom it is made without any profit or advantage received or promised as a consideration for it. It is not, however, the less gratuitous if it proceed either from gratitude for a benefit before received, or from the hope of receiving one hereafter, although such benefits be of a pecuniary nature. Any thing given or promised as a consideration for the engagement or gift; any service, interest or condition imposed on what is given or promised, although unequal to it in value, makes a contract onerous in its nature.



Considered in relation to their effects, contracts are either certain or hazardous. A contract is certain when the thing to be done is supposed to depend on the will of the party or when, in the usual course of events, it must happen in the manner stipulated. It is hazardous when the performance of that which is one of its objects depends on an uncertain event. Some divide contracts under the five following heads:



Into reciprocal and unilateral.



Into consensual or those which are formed by the mere consent of the parties such as sale, hiring and mandate; and those in which it is necessary there should be something more than mere consent, such as loan of money, deposit or pledge, which from their nature require a delivery of the thing (rei) whence they are called real contracts.



Into first contracts of mutual interest which are such as are entered into for the reciprocal interest and utility of each of the parties, as sales exchange, partnership and the like.



Contracts of beneficence which are those by which only one of the contracting parties is benefited, as loans, deposit and mandate.



Mixed contracts, which are those by which one of the parties confers a benefit on the other, receiving something of inferior value in return, such as a donation subject to a charge,



Into principal and accessory.
__________________
And speaking of successes - congrats to gregtu: you just made the 10,000th post on suijuris.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-18-2004, 12:47 PM
gregtu gregtu is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 823
CONTRACTS

The first sentence shoud open up some eyes
__________________
And speaking of successes - congrats to gregtu: you just made the 10,000th post on suijuris.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-19-2004, 11:59 AM
sixthbeast
 
Posts: n/a
CONTRACTS

so how do you bring this up in court?



how do I ask for evidence of a contract? Or is it even worth asking this.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-19-2004, 05:54 PM
kgod999
 
Posts: n/a
CONTRACTS

Restatement (Second) of Contracts ยง 110 (1979). The Statute of Frauds pri-mary function is to prevent fraud in contracts, which by their very nature have been sub-ject to such wrongdoing. While electronic contracting does not involve a writing or a signature in the classical sense of ink and paper, leading commentators to question whether electronic contracting violates the Statute of Frauds, there is authority that elec-tronic contracts can satisfy it. The requirements of a "writing" and a "signature" can be found although their virtual world counterparts do not, in the traditional sense, exist. The record of the agree-ment will be found either in the computer's memory, or on it's internal storage (hard disk drive or, for longer term storage, tape). Information stored in a com-puter's memory con-stitutes a "writing" where that information is capable of being repro-duced in tangible form such as on a printer. See e.g., Smith v. International Paper Co., 87 F.3d 245 (8th Cir. 1996); Armstrong v. Executive Office of the President, 877 F. Supp. 690 (D.D.C. 1995); Clyburn v. Allstate Ins. Co., 826 F. Supp. 955 (D.S.C. 1993). Simi-larly, the signa-ture requirement has been found to be met by a long line of cases which argue that any symbol, meant as a signature satisfies the Statute of Frauds. See e.g., Mat-ter of Save-on-Carpets of Arizona, Inc., 545 F.2d 1239 (9th Cir. 1976) (typed name on UCC financing statement); Associated Hardware Supply Co. v. Big Wheel Distrib. Co., 355 F.2d 114 (3d Cir. 1966). Such symbols should include digital signatures or other re-liable computer generated identification techniques.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-10-2006, 04:10 PM
aksis's Avatar
aksis aksis is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Universal Kingdom of God; Earth
Posts: 1,111
Contracts under seal... that would be a notarized contract, right? Or in other words,

a contract where both signatures are witnessed,

by an officer/official (the notary) of the system (any system, not just US),

that maintains a/the court[s],

that any controversies/disagreements about the terms of the contract sealed, or a breach of it,

will be disputed in, and enforced by,

... correct? (I hope that came out clear ;-)

Last edited by aksis : 12-26-2006 at 01:02 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-10-2006, 05:00 PM
charlesa6's Avatar
charlesa6 charlesa6 is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Illinois(chi-town)
Posts: 5,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by sixthbeast
so how do you bring this up in court?



how do I ask for evidence of a contract? Or is it even worth asking this.
Sure,If any fraud involved in the contract or promissory note, you can request for original documents for inspection during discovery.
__________________
Resolution pending
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Checks and contracts kjvpatriot1611 Banks, Collectors, and CRAs 26 01-10-2006 10:00 AM
Common law judgment kgod999 Court 18 12-13-2005 08:03 AM
declaratory judgment win!!! kgod999 Success Stories 44 12-13-2005 07:54 AM
adhesion contracts/invisible contracts squirrel Citizenship & Jurisdiction 7 09-06-2004 12:45 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:33 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2008 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer