Smj = Suject Matter Jurisdiction - Page 4

David Merrill · #31 08-24-2006, 08:26 PM

The motion in the back will have the judge recess and return saying, "This court has no subject matter jurisdiction."

Regards,

David Merrill.

kran sanis · #32 08-24-2006, 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David Merrill

The motion in the back will have the judge recess and return saying, "This court has no subject matter jurisdiction."

Regards,

David Merrill.

David Merrill,

I agree completly. Although 17 pages is a bit much. There is certainly room to condense and not loose a stride in the motion. I have a document that I am about to utilize within a prior judgment. Joiner v State is a part of it. I however am utilizing collateral measures to the greater extent. The Authority of Law has proven to be my awakening within the aspect of law.

David Merrill · #33 08-24-2006, 09:13 PM

You betcha - Refusal for Cause.

Why bother trying to explain law to Shoonra and Judge Roy Bean. They are not about to listen to me. They knowingly call me by a legal or full name.

Today I asked Shoonra to please explain what it is with that; I believe she is going to go silent on the matter.

Regards,

David Merrill.

kran sanis · #34 08-24-2006, 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David Merrill

You betcha - Refusal for Cause.

Why bother trying to explain law to Shoonra and Judge Roy Bean. They are not about to listen to me. They knowingly call me by a legal or full name.

Today I asked Shoonra to please explain what it is with that; I believe she is going to go silent on the matter.

Regards,

David Merrill.

Actually the judgment was entered in 2003. Refusal for cause is a waste of time in court currently. It is however time for true Sovereign language- Affidavidt for demand of DECLARATORY JUDGMENT. Will share when appropriate.

Big Al · #35 08-25-2006, 03:22 AM

No folks I make no money from the promotion of James B. Woods III material or the receive any consideration from him in any way. Why do I repeatedly reference him, as he has done many years of research and study into this subject. I have paid full price for his material and find it to be the best I have ever seen. In the years before the internet we only had seminars to attend with much questionable material provided, Most of the people in attendance were there for either income tax, or traffic issues. I attended my first of these in the 1980's.In all the years I never saw anyone give a bibliography of study books for research. This always left me with the impression that their materials where not well prepared and ghastly made up. This in all cases when used before courts proved to be the case. None of it worked. I have never made one cent off of any fellow American nor would I, in a search for the truth. I only promote people who's material I have found brought sound understanding to these subjects.

I best leave this to the rest of you folks to continue with what ever direction you wish to take this. I need to spend time doing my own research and will bow out as I did not mean to cause any hard feelings from the forum, so I will go silent and only monitor from this point forward. Best wishes to all! And a thanks to all who made this and interesting endeavor.

David Merrill · #36 08-25-2006, 05:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kran sanis

Actually the judgment was entered in 2003. Refusal for cause is a waste of time in court currently. It is however time for true Sovereign language- Affidavidt for demand of DECLARATORY JUDGMENT. Will share when appropriate.

Of course it is. You use Refusal for Cause to avoid going to court. It is an abatement tactic.

Quote:

Will share when appropriate.

I am not holding my breath on a tease like that. Some day we may hope you will impart the higher wisdom? pffft!

Regards,

David Merrill.

P.S.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big Al

I best leave this to the rest of you folks to continue with what ever direction you wish to take this. I need to spend time doing my own research and will bow out as I did not mean to cause any hard feelings from the forum, so I will go silent and only monitor from this point forward. Best wishes to all! And a thanks to all who made this and interesting endeavor.

I am terribly sorry to hear about that Big Al. Like within this very post I like to make it clear that there are many different opinions here on suijuris. Mostly because of different perspectives. One cannot evaluate the effectiveness of R4C by attorney opinions from black robes. If the attorney sees the contract as sealed, there is no avoiding it; it is sacred instrument. So one can R4C after three days but only in preparation for how to do it timely next time.

We will hash things out and get childish insulting about it too. Speaking for myself, drafting remedy for people in the most simple law conditions possible ('saving to suitors' clause of 1789) I find the debates, no matter how nasty an edifying psychological profile about denial, dissociation with reality and protectionism for the status quo of false balances (fractionalizing fiat currency).

http://www.suijuris.net/forum/office...html#post85419

I certainly understand how you feel in writing that. I for one hope you will continue with your comments and ignore insultinator mentality and cheap shots at researchers you respect.

Codee · #37 08-25-2006, 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Akira

Hmmm... 6 plugs for this guy in the first 17 posts? Are you getting a kickback? With those prices, he can afford to pay it..

Why then, would anyone with a clue on the subject, offer their insight here, in this thread, for free... when, as demonstrated, there is plenty of money to be made by selling the knowledge instead?

I will personally check out the books that both David and Big Al have proposed. Then if they are "worth it" in my humble opinion I will tell you too. If they are garbage in my mind then I will tell you that also.

I did not find the price of the book set big Al suggests as reading to be unreasonably high. Yes it may not be as cheap as internet stealing but when some someone writes a book and not just a blog F' fest then they deserve to be paid. I f someone does not want to by it then they can always research the material themselves.

I will also mention that I have contributed to the sui juris forum yet I do not get LRG books for free.

I further would have no problem if Big Al was getting a kickback as long as the material was genuinly helpful and not sold as a fraud.

I find both David Merrill and Big Al to inteligent, patient, kind people and do not think either of them are on this forum to defraud or do anything other then help.

People should spend time trying to understand how some of these concepts REALY work and how powerful they are. David and Al both have unique and benifitial insights that one would be stupid to disregard.

Cody James

Codee · #38 08-25-2006, 09:26 AM

Man,

I just read Big Al's last post. This sucks. Why aren't personal messages being sent to Al to ask him about this crap. Al provided a link to info he thought was good. You all just lost the thread starter and I know he has alot of good ideas to share and an ability to think. All Al was able to do was give a starting research point and a link to where he found some of his good info.

This makes me sad. I will find some forum in which I can talk to Big Al. Mabey person E-mail accounts where there is no collateral damage.

I don't think myself and Al even had one exchange and it was us that wanted this thread! ARGGGG!!!! If its not REDCLOUD or Scooterdog does it have to be something???

Akira · #39 08-25-2006, 12:46 PM

Admin doesn't tolerate links for profit, unless they're in the service providers section..

Several posts, as of late, have been removed advertising medications, porn and other commercial links.

Even HB's posts regarding the SJ / sovereign license plates were removed...

I merely made the observation that 6 promotions in the first 7 of Big Al's posts was a bit obtusive, especially in the manner they were made.

There's nothing wrong with plugging a good source of info... Lord knows Marc Stevens, LB Bork, and Ticket Slayer have gotten their share of references from SJ... and their research and material has been shared openly and repeatedly, with no complaints.

I never said the info was bad, or wasn't 'worth it'... Do I think it's pricey? You bet.. and I'm not alone in that observation.
I never said anything about anyones integrity... or the quality of their ideas, observations or opinions.
I simply made the observation that 6 plugs in 7 posts was obtuse.

No one is suggesting that Wood's package be posted openly, but to suggest that you must spend $200+ to qualify your opinion or "you're lost" is offensive to many.

This very premise is contrary to what this site is about... the free and open exchange of ideas, observations, experiences, knowledge and wisdom.

I'm as sick as everyone else of the BS that seems so pervasive as of late, and the "You don't know SH--, unless....." attitude.

I thought we were here to help each other...

Some have time to study, but no money.. others have money, but no time.. some have neither, some have both. But we all face the same enemy.. those who would use their strength, power, and numbers, to oppress their fellow man.

I've had many wins challenging SMJ. I plug TS, then share insight, techniques, and offer my time & assistance, publicly and privately, to all, for free... and only ask that others "pay it forward" and teach 3 others to do, as I have done for them..

Do I set the bar to high? I don't think so..

For HIS Glory,
Akira

Codee · #40 08-25-2006, 01:07 PM

I agree with alot of what you say Akira however...

1) Big Al cannot "pay it forward" if he is honest and the material is copyrighted. I would not want someone buying my books and giving them away as new free copies.

2) Big Al simply may not be able to restate the ideas as well as the original author. I have found myself in this possition before and say "You just got to go to the source yourself."

3) Until big Al does digest the material and put it in his own words the only avenue we have is to get the same material from the same source that he did. It is not Big Al's fault that this guy charges. But Big AL did spend the money, and from what I know bought the entire set. Big Al has told me that he has not met the gentleman author but has one brief talk with him (but Big Al should speak for himself on this.)

4)

4)