US vs. NATIONWIDE CREDIT, INC.

[suijuris]

<FONT face="courier new, courier, mono">See it here: </FONT><FONT face="courier new, courier, mono">http://www.suijuris.net/main/suijuris/article.php?story=20031201162320880</FONT>


<FONT face="courier new, courier, mono">Ice,
</FONT><FONT face="courier new, courier, mono">First, thanks for this submission.
</FONT><FONT face="courier new, courier, mono">Second, you said that this could be used when a collector does not obey FDCPA... how about a CRA?</FONT>


<FONT face="courier new, courier, mono">Sui Juris</FONT>

[Ice]

The CRA isn't attempting to collect a debt.& There would need to be specific law cited to address them.& But when the collector cannot, does not, or refuses to VERIFY the debt -- the CRA MUST remove said item from the report.& If you were to file a similar suit against a collector it could be used to support your position with the CRA... and serve as a warning to them that you don't "play".& There could be a suit against them for "damage" done to your character as well as to your financial status if the item is not removed.


There are a lot of different ways to handle these situations.& We can weave in and out of their law just as well as they can if we apply ourselves to the task.


&

[sadie]

For CRA use the Fair Credit Reporting Act