Preemptive Abatement, an Interesting Proposal by a Dated File

Originally Posted by mrg

HB, I respect your person, and your knowledge, and have learned from your posts.

If you do not think Charles has contributed substance, I suggest you research his posts for the nuggets that are indeed there.

Do you not think there are better targets here for sniping?

What is the point?

First, I got rid of that "person" the state claims I had.

Second, I wasn't sniping.

Third, Charles is a fixture here. I agree.

Fourth, I agree that there are a few nuggets of substantive contribution by Charles among his vast catalogue of "Yep That's Right" posts.

I was only welcoming someone to the forum, and mentioning that they already met the doorman.

Charles is usually the first to welcome newbies.

[charlesa6]

Originally Posted by HenryBowman

What did I say that pissed in your cornflakes so bad?

I can spell and use the English language correctly, but I am a dumb bell. ROFLMAO!!!!

I know better than to have employees.

Later on.

I tell you what you did. You don't have no respect for this bulletin board or member's in this forum.
Quatlooser, they are better than you in many ways. Let call a space a space when iron is hot.
Trust me I know.
If I'm the moderator of this forum, I will filter you out longtime ago because you are corrupting the member's with your idiocy attitude.
What the doorman mean? That's insult, disrespect, arrogant, and stupid etc.
It seems to me that you don't think knowledgeable, before you attack people with your stupidity.
What the editing mean? You still lacking the common sense mondo.
Use your brain; do have to teach you everything.

[David Merrill]

Trust me I know....

What the doorman mean? That's insult, disrespect, arrogant, and stupid etc.

Charles is no doubt a greeter here at suijuris. Fine. Charles is also using English as his second language and fortunately people know that or in the alternative would just think he talks funny. I would not be surprised if there is no response because I think I am on Charles' ignore list.

He interpreted the term "doorman" to be an insult. Now Charles owes Henry Franklin a heartfelt and public apology.



Regards,

David Merrill.

[mrg]

Originally Posted by HenryBowman

First, I got rid of that "person" the state claims I had.

Second, I wasn't sniping.

Third, Charles is a fixture here. I agree.

Fourth, I agree that there are a few nuggets of substantive contribution by Charles among his vast catalogue of "Yep That's Right" posts.

I was only welcoming someone to the forum, and mentioning that they already met the doorman.

Charles is usually the first to welcome newbies.

I am not "the state," or of "the state" I did not use the language of "the state" regarding my respect for your "person."

That was a "personal" comment on my perception of the priceless value of your human character.

"The state" twists these words to mean other than what they etymologically, and definitively are in order to deceive.

How have I deceived?

I have no need to get "rid of that 'person' the state claims I had," because I am I, me, myself, and know it, and have always known it.

There is nothing to get "rid of."

Trying to get rid of something that does not exist is like a dog chasing its own tail.

If you were not sniping, considering past posts directed at the particular target, I perceived this as another attempt to demean and humiliate.

My apologies if this was truly not your intention, however, if not, why the neccesity for the particular comment, directed, by name, at a specific contributor in the first place?

You seem, as indicated previously, to take great umbrage to, or to question the practice of Charles "vast catalogue of "Yep That's Right" posts."

So what?

It is nothing more than an indication to the poster that he has read, studied, and noticed, most everything written here.

This is in no way directed at you, but I know many people who have a command of the properties and form of the expression of the English language that are wont to use this ability to the detriment of there fellows.

Plenty of Idiots know how to spell and use proper grammar.

Prove to me that Jesus Christ was other than illiterate, or even had need for "literacy."

[charlesa6]

[quote=David Merrill]Charles is no doubt a greeter here at suijuris. Fine.

Charles is also using English as his second language and fortunately people know that or in the alternative would just think he talks funny. I would not be surprised if there is no response because I think I am on Charles' ignore list.

Misleading! You don't no who I'm. You still going back to the same assumption again.

He interpreted the term "doorman" to be an insult. Now Charles owes Henry Franklin a heartfelt and public apology.

Dream on. In your dream!
He can call you doorman and live with it but not me.
I don't need to put you on my ignore list, I will deal with you too at all level. Bring it on. We have to filter out the bad apple for this community for better place to learning.

[David Merrill]

[quote=charlesa6]

Originally Posted by David Merrill

Charles is no doubt a greeter here at suijuris. Fine. Misleading! You don't no who I'm. You still going back to the same assumption again.

Dream on. In your dream!
He can call you doorman and live with it but not me.
I don't need to put you on my ignore list, I will deal with you too at all level. Bring it on. We have to filter out the bad apple for this community for better place to learning.

Last we ever spoke to each other you were very upset with me over a simple misunderstanding caused by a language barrier. I remember we established you are Chinese living in Chicago but am not sure I recall that correctly. If you do not see that your English writing skills are effected by this being your second language then we really can better understand the core of your perceived insult from Henry.

Occasionally I welcome people to the forum and now I am concerned about the impression this newcomer has from this recent misunderstanding and foul language. So bring in on Henry - call me Doorman and see what happens! I know your handle! Admin should consider Charles' use of foul language even with astericks carefully.


Regards,

David Merrill.

[Akira]

NOW HEAR THIS....

I am concerned about the impression this newcomer has...

Unconstructive, irrelevant posts are a waste of EVERYONES time and energy, and this boards resources, and show a lack of respect for same.


High post counts won't get you respect or earn you a dismissal in court.


Are temporary bans going to become necessary?


Instead, maybe we should be counting our blessings this board even exists.


Most would still be lost without it.




"Wise men talk because they have something to say;
fools talk because they have to say something." - Plato

[David Merrill]

I was just thinking that if Henry appointed me doorman instead of Charles, then we wouldn't have to put up with Fou* Lan***ge.



P.S. I think Henry has big ears!

[Akira]

Despite being a bit out of date... I like it.

I would, however, replace the word 'person' & "natural person' with 'flesh and blood man' (or similar) where appropriate.


For HIS Glory,
Akira

[mrg]

[quote=David Merrill]

Originally Posted by charlesa6

No you do not remember that correctly, you (not "we"), insistently presumed that he was Chinese.

If you do not see that your English writing skills manifest in the effect of exhibiting ignorance by misuse of terms of the English language by employing the term "effect" for the term "affect," do we not live somewhat in a glass house?

If perchance you have correctly applied the term, could you also explain the meaning it imparts to the sentence?

In fact, after analysis, precisely what does that sentence mean?

What is the logical relationship of the phrase "then we really can better understand the core of your perceived insult from Henry" to the phrase "If you do not see that your English writing skills are effected by this being your second language?

It looks and sounds like a poorly constructed sentence of questionable meaning.

Oh really?

So do, "bring 'in' on," please?

Where-"in" are we bringing what, pray tell?

"In"-to the glass house?

Admin might also consider the nature and cause of "Charles' use of foul language even with astericks carefully."

Regards,

David Merrill.