The 3 Layers of Challenging Jurisdiction/ Never Too Late

[mystic one]

Does one need to file a restricted appearance/ memorandum of law to challenge subject matter jurisdiction?

The reason i ask is that if someone refuses for causes within the 72 hours, there shouldnt even be a adminstrative hearing set by the judge. The refusal for cause is suppose to vacate the hearing right away. Or do you need to combine the refusal for cause with a restricted apperance/memorandum.. im sure filing a "restricted appearance" is redudant if one has already cured remedy in court of comptent jurisdiction if you all ready filed you refusal for cause paperwork in a timely manner? The restricted appearance would only come into play if you have missed the 72 hour deadline? then if you have missed the 72 hour deadline, you can still challenge subject matter jurisdiction through your restricted appearance?

but to take this one step further, Marc Stevens doesnt even file his restricted apperance? He has successfully vacated all charges by just challenging jurisdicting by him being proficient in court proceedings? Which makes me conclude that one could miss the 72 hour deadline, one could then fail to file a restricted apperance after they missed the 72 hour deadline, and still have charges vacated, when the prosecuter cant answer questions like cause of action, what is a state, et cetra like marc does?

[Judge Roy Bean]

Originally Posted by mystic one

Does one need to file a restricted appearance/ memorandum of law to challenge subject matter jurisdiction?

The reason i ask is that if someone refuses for causes within the 72 hours, there shouldnt even be a adminstrative hearing set by the judge. The refusal for cause is suppose to vacate the hearing right away.

Why would such a legal nullity issued from someone with no standing or authority have any effect on a scheduled hearing?

Originally Posted by mystic one

Or do you need to combine the refusal for cause with a restricted apperance/memorandum.. im sure filing a "restricted appearance" is redudant if one has already cured remedy in court of comptent jurisdiction if you all ready filed you refusal for cause paperwork in a timely manner? The restricted appearance would only come into play if you have missed the 72 hour deadline? then if you have missed the 72 hour deadline, you can still challenge subject matter jurisdiction through your restricted appearance?

but to take this one step further, Marc Stevens doesnt even file his restricted apperance? He has successfully vacated all charges by just challenging jurisdicting by him being proficient in court proceedings? Which makes me conclude that one could miss the 72 hour deadline, one could then fail to file a restricted apperance after they missed the 72 hour deadline, and still have charges vacated, when the prosecuter cant answer questions like cause of action, what is a state, et cetra like marc does?

If only it worked in the real world. You're in legal lalla land and Stevens is the only beneficiary when people buy into it.

[mystic one]

On what authority do i have? I ask you the same question , what authority do you have, what legal standing do you have to preside over my case. Did i give you this authority Judge Bean? Show me this delegation i gave you to preside over these matters.

If i am legal la la land like you say. What makes you think your legal la la land applies to me?

Please state which Law gives you authority over the spirit beings actions ?What is a person? What is a human being? Are you attemping to make a legal determination for me Roy? What act, a statue gives you authority? Sound LIke holly-wood, Merlin the Magician to me. Please keep your Masonic Hoodwink for you fellow lodge members. enjoy the luciferic doctrine.

[Codee]

Originally Posted by mystic one

Does one need to file a restricted appearance/ memorandum of law to challenge subject matter jurisdiction?

No you don't. But you need to if you are going to chalenge in personam jurisdiction later.

[Codee]

Originally Posted by Judge Roy Bean

Why would such a legal nullity issued from someone with no standing or authority have any effect on a scheduled hearing?
Yes why would a ticket issued by the wrong agency and then not the subject of a formal administrative hearing, be of any consequence? Listen to the judge on this one. The ticket is a bill of attainder or pains and the "court" is sitting as administration. The "judge" is a magistrate and there is no judicial process. There is no SMJ and so the whole proceeding is sham.
If only it worked in the real world. You're in legal lalla land and Stevens is the only beneficiary when people buy into it.
SMJ does work and judges like JRB who think it is ferry lala land stuff do get into trouble.

*****************