Go Back   Suijuris Forums > General Discussion > End Days of America
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-07-2005, 11:08 PM
androidmeme
 
Posts: n/a
Post Saddam Refuses To Attend Trial

Former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein is refusing to attend his trial over the killing of 148 Shias in 1982. He is refusing to attend in protest of the conditions in which he is being held and how the trial against him is being conducted by the court.

Read Full Story...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-08-2005, 01:57 AM
Livefire's Avatar
Livefire Livefire is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,450
BWHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!

The dude told them to go to hell! He does have cajones the size of bowling balls!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-08-2005, 02:59 AM
suijuris's Avatar
suijuris suijuris is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,511
I have been following these antics and find them quite amusing. I will not be surprised at anything tried by Saddam as he has nothing to loose. All attempts will be made to paint the trial as a sham as it seems the court is willing to bend over backwards to avoid that appearance.

Has anyone noticed the nature of the evidence the prosecution is reported as bringing forward? Videos of a rambling deathbed statement, and most testimony appears to be made by people hiding behind curtains.

What I find most intriguing about the testimony given is that in all reports I have read, there is no claim of Saddam's involvement in the reported abuses of power, rather people in his government are doing the act.

Anyone who finds himself in a position of government over men, no matter what structure of government he advertises, by assuming the authority for himself and his agents to speak and act for as well as initiate force against his fellow man, he should suffer the the same consequence of those against whom force or fraud was initiated by his agents.

It matters not whether the principal ordered, authorized, or had any knowledge of the acts of his agents. There is no excuse for lack of knowledge in government as someone not in control of his agents is unfit for the office. Further, the the principle must stand accountable for the actions of the agent.

So yes, if there is valid evidence that shows the agents of Saddam were involved in an ongoing abuse of power and he did not act to stop them, even if such an act were political and/or literal suicide, he and his agents should be rode out at dawn and well... paint your own picture based on your beliefs regarding grace and retribution and taking out the trash.

Then lets march on DC and prove we are not a bunch of hypocrites and clean up house there for all the lies, scandals, torture, killings, and general abuse of power filtering its way through the world from the US principals.
__________________
When a statute, code, or court holding changes tomorrow, does reality change? Does truth change? Does right and wrong change?
If so, there are no absolutes, and the only logical conclusion is that reality, truth, and right and wrong are determined arbitrarily on a daily basis by those with the most power, guns, and money, and the rest of us can choose to run, fight, or be their slaves.

Last edited by suijuris : 12-08-2005 at 03:00 AM. Reason: line breaks lost
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-08-2005, 07:09 AM
kgod999
 
Posts: n/a
saddam

I used to be a federal officer. Before you guys get to picking on Saddam, consider this (IF,let me repeat, IF, thats the real Saddam they have in court), back around 1993 we had a guy in max protection at a federal prison who was the head of a Italian bank in the United States. I asked him WHY we were protecting him and his reply was " you are protecting me from the government." He said that (and this was during Bush's FATHER'S PRESIDENCY), that BEFORE the Gulf War, the Bush administration authorized him to give Saddam a 5 billion dollar loan to build up Iraq's military. This was done so that Iraq would have the ability to invade kuwait, in return, the Bush administration tricked Saddam and used that as pretext to attack Iraq. When congress found out about the money coming thru the bush administration, the bank president was told to lie about Bush's knowledge, take the fall (like oliver north), and he wouldnt go to jail. If he refused, well, they would get him, thus, he was in isolation waiting trail. Stop believing the mass deception of the media. Saddam and ben laden always been cia stooges, like noreiga in panama. noriega started bucking and froze illegal assets he was protecting , thus, they went and got him. saddam refused to go into MORE debt with the united states corporations, thus they went and just took the oil instead of tricking him out of it with debt.

Last edited by kgod999 : 12-08-2005 at 07:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-08-2005, 08:10 AM
weishaupt1776's Avatar
weishaupt1776 weishaupt1776 is offline
The Outta Commissiona
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Republic
Posts: 5,335
Quote:
Originally Posted by androidmeme
Former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein is refusing to attend his trial over the killing of 148 Shias in 1982.
Did he really do that?
__________________
THE DOWNLOADS SECTION IS BROKEN & WILL NEVER BE FIXED, SO STOP BUGGING ME !

www.pacinlaw.org ~ www.pacgroups.us
Multi multa, non omnia novit = Many men know many things, no one knows everything.
The De jure Political Group: www.statenationals.net
Do you have concerns about America? www.redamendment.net
Is the government acting in your interest? www.notmygovernment.us
Have you been Deprogrammed? www.deprogram.us


DOWNLOAD THIS COURSE NOW !!

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-08-2005, 03:42 PM
Dano
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by kgod999
I used to be a federal officer. Before you guys get to picking on Saddam, consider this (IF,let me repeat, IF, thats the real Saddam they have in court), back around 1993 we had a guy in max protection at a federal prison who was the head of a Italian bank in the United States. I asked him WHY we were protecting him and his reply was " you are protecting me from the government." He said that (and this was during Bush's FATHER'S PRESIDENCY), that BEFORE the Gulf War, the Bush administration authorized him to give Saddam a 5 billion dollar loan to build up Iraq's military. This was done so that Iraq would have the ability to invade kuwait, in return, the Bush administration tricked Saddam and used that as pretext to attack Iraq. When congress found out about the money coming thru the bush administration, the bank president was told to lie about Bush's knowledge, take the fall (like oliver north), and he wouldnt go to jail. If he refused, well, they would get him, thus, he was in isolation waiting trail. Stop believing the mass deception of the media. Saddam and ben laden always been cia stooges, like noreiga in panama. noriega started bucking and froze illegal assets he was protecting , thus, they went and got him. saddam refused to go into MORE debt with the united states corporations, thus they went and just took the oil instead of tricking him out of it with debt.

I agree it's all a government 3 ring circus. Sadam is an agent Bin Laden is an agent, hell the cia helped fund and organize Al Quadia when the Russians invaded Afganastan.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-08-2005, 05:10 PM
charlesa6's Avatar
charlesa6 charlesa6 is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Illinois(chi-town)
Posts: 5,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by kgod999
I used to be a federal officer. Before you guys get to picking on Saddam, consider this (IF,let me repeat, IF, thats the real Saddam they have in court), back around 1993 we had a guy in max protection at a federal prison who was the head of a Italian bank in the United States. I asked him WHY we were protecting him and his reply was " you are protecting me from the government." He said that (and this was during Bush's FATHER'S PRESIDENCY), that BEFORE the Gulf War, the Bush administration authorized him to give Saddam a 5 billion dollar loan to build up Iraq's military. This was done so that Iraq would have the ability to invade kuwait, in return, the Bush administration tricked Saddam and used that as pretext to attack Iraq. When congress found out about the money coming thru the bush administration, the bank president was told to lie about Bush's knowledge, take the fall (like oliver north), and he wouldnt go to jail. If he refused, well, they would get him, thus, he was in isolation waiting trail. Stop believing the mass deception of the media. Saddam and ben laden always been cia stooges, like noreiga in panama. noriega started bucking and froze illegal assets he was protecting , thus, they went and got him. saddam refused to go into MORE debt with the united states corporations, thus they went and just took the oil instead of tricking him out of it with debt.
Good point, and precisely well said.
__________________
Resolution pending
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-10-2005, 08:27 AM
rottweiler's Avatar
rottweiler rottweiler is online now
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: judicial district of tens: Milwaukee the county: Wisconsin the land
Posts: 2,589
Makes sense kgod999.

Yes, the 911 planes were a smoke screen for the preplanted bombs and the whole war on terror is a scam. First we have a war on poverty, then drugs, now terror. Can you see the incrementalism? We are being played bigtime by the luciferians on their diasterous attempt to destroy the Creator. They will fail! There is no reason for their deceptions to work on us any more. We are witnesses to the battle of Good v. evil and we must learn to put on the Armor of the Holy Spirit for protection from the deceptions of the luciferians.

Was Hussein set-up from the start? I think it is a luciferian technique(not enough royal blood)that is well practiced throughout history. Trotsky, JFK, RFK, Nixon, Lady Diana, Hitler, Stalin, and on and on and on. I call it "create a boogie man" like Goldstein of Orwell's 1984.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-10-2005, 11:50 AM
HenryBowman
 
Posts: n/a
Saddam is no more or less guilty than Ted Kennedy.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-10-2005, 07:45 PM
charlesa6's Avatar
charlesa6 charlesa6 is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Illinois(chi-town)
Posts: 5,076
Hehehehehe! Very funny.
__________________
Resolution pending
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cites - FDCPA (Title 15, Chapter 41, Subchapter V) suijuris Banks, Collectors, and CRAs 38 11-04-2007 03:54 PM
Larken Rose Trial Coverage weishaupt1776 Taxation 23 01-04-2007 08:37 PM
"Petition for Writ of Mandamus" to the Florida Supreme Court iamfreeru2 Court 7 08-02-2005 12:13 PM
Tax court reversal `incredible' iamfreeru2 Taxation 11 06-27-2005 09:36 AM
Who is right? Depends on the Timing! Jim Court 50 05-25-2005 01:32 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:55 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2007 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer