End Days of America Know your future in America and the world - read and report signs of the times here and you cannot say you have not been warned!


Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > General Discussion > End Days of America
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-01-2006, 07:40 AM
David Merrill's Avatar
David Merrill David Merrill is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,327
Jewish Mel Gibson...

I was watching an interview that cropped up around Mel Gibson's recent DUI arrest when he proclaims up and down [in the shadow of The Passion] that he could not be a racist or antisemite because he is a Christian - in his case that means strict Roman Catholic, born-and-raised. Christianity is a sect of Judaism and of course Judaism is not a physical race so much as a belief set.

In The Other End of the World; An Alternate Theory Linking Prophecy and History by Roger Rusk we find an ultimate treatise on Historicism, as opposed to Futurism (Rapture Theory) and Pretorism (all prophecy was fulfilled with the Fall of Rome). Interestingly Roger quotes Dr. Grattam Guinness, "If one does not understand the difference between Isrealite and Jew, then he is still in prophetic infancy." In other words in order to understand the fulfilling of Biblical prophecies one has to understand the position of the Jews as enemies of Israel.

To understand the Jews are actually enemies of Israel it is important to read Ezra and Nehemiah. The Jews were created in Babylon and King Darius, a Jewish hero took on the commission to rebuild the Temple in Jerusalem. He sent the Jews (Babylonian assimilants) back to Jerusalem and they were met with fierce resistance from the Israelites. The Jews had to work with one man assigned to cover his back at all times so that they could fight off assaults from the Israelites. The Jews since their Babylonian creation are enemies of the Israelites.

And another thing is the misconstruction of the term antisemite.

Quote:
Gen 10:1 Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the flood.
Gen 10:2 The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras.
Gen 10:3 And the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz, and Riphath, and Togarmah.

The Bible symbols, factual families and figures or not depict that Ham's descendants are the blacks of northern Africa. Shem's descendants stayed in the Fertile Crescent around the Mediterranean Sea and Japheth's descendants went north into Russia. The Ashkenazim are not Semitic (of Shem) at all. They are Japhetic. Over 95% of all Jews today are Ashkenazim, not Sephardim (a large sect that settled in Gaul [France]). A term generally applied to Ashkenazim is Hungarian Jew and this huge majority of the genetic Jewish population is Arthur Koestler's The Thirteenth Tribe - the Khazarians who converted to Judaism at the Half-Week of Daniel (1260 years after the MENE, MENE, TEKEL, UPHARSIN incident). My point being that it is nonsense to consider a genetic bloodline into Judaism the criteria, especially since all the geneologies were destroyed around 70 AD anyway.

Leaving us with theology and religion being the basis for being Jewish, Mel Gibson is a Jew of a large sect that is rejected by those Jews who reject Jesus Christ as the Messiah of God.

So Mel's drunken utterances against Jews and accusing them of being the cause of all wars etc. would probably be better placed accusing them, himself included of producing a lot of Hollywood movies. He would have saved a lot of reputation without all the confusion about identity, including his own.



Regards,

David Merrill.

Last edited by David Merrill : 08-01-2006 at 07:43 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-01-2006, 08:24 AM
J.W.'s Avatar
J.W. J.W. is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 294
I would venture to say that Mel Gibson is not an anti-Semite but an anti-Zionist. However, the respective Jewish community is quick to throw anyone who denounces the polices or politics of the State of Israel as an anti-Semite.

Mel Gibson's statements were wrong and as a result he shamed himself. He will most certainly have a long road ahead as his statements will surely be well-lodged into the world conciousness, as the media will continue to remind us over and over and over again about such.

Hopefully Mel Gibson will do well with the treatment he has sought so such never happens again.

If I were him I'd seriously consider my options as to how to settle the tension he has created for himself.
__________________
NOTICE & CAVEAT: This post is provided "AS IS" and without warranties of any kind either expressed or implied and is not to be construed as legal advice in any capacity whatsoever.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-01-2006, 12:22 PM
masterduke masterduke is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Water Wonderland
Posts: 1,185
Hes got the dough and thats all that matters. Who cares what anybody thinks?.. Money Talks And BS Walks.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-01-2006, 12:50 PM
David Merrill's Avatar
David Merrill David Merrill is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,327
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Whitney

I would venture to say that Mel Gibson is not an anti-Semite but an anti-Zionist. However, the respective Jewish community is quick to throw anyone who denounces the polices or politics of the State of Israel as an anti-Semite.


You are almost certainly correct as to what Mel is anti-. I didn't even get into the distinction of Zionist and Jew. www.jewsnotzionists.org

Mel's remark about Jews starting wars reminded me of a 1928 Century Magazine article:

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...cle_Page01.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...cle_Page02.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...cle_Page03.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...cle_Page04.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...cle_Page05.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...cle_Page06.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...cle_Page07.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...cle_Page08.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...cle_Page09.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...cle_Page10.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...cle_Page11.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...cle_Page12.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...cle_Page13.jpg


I am sure the dough he makes (I heard he bought an island) smoothes things over, but then again, him not being able to go through a DUI like normal people...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-01-2006, 01:28 PM
2tim215 2tim215 is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 283
QUOTE=David Merrill]Judaism is not a physical race so much as a belief set. [David Merrill. [/quote]
But it is in fact, both.
Wikpedia
Jews (Hebrew: יְהוּדִים, Yehudim; Yiddish: ייִדן, Yiden) are followers of Judaism or, more generally, members of the Jewish people (also known as the Jewish nation, or the Children of Israel), an ethno-religious group descended from the ancient Israelites and from converts who joined their religion. The term also includes those who have undergone an officially recognized formal process of religious conversion to Judaism. The current Jewish population is over 14.5 million, the majority of whom live in Israel and the United States.

Israel originally came from descendants of Jacob, the son of Isaac the son of Abraham (technically Abraham was not Jewish as the Jewish nation did not exist during his lifetime).
Gen 32:27(KJV) And he said unto him, What is thy name? And he said, Jacob.
Gen 32:28(KJV) And he said, Thy name shall be called no more Jacob, but Israel: for as a prince hast thou power with God and with men, and hast prevailed.
The original Jews were the descendants of Israel (or Jacob).

"
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
If one does not understand the difference between Isrealite and Jew, then he is still in prophetic infancy." In other words in order to understand the fulfilling of Biblical prophecies one has to understand the position of the Jews as enemies of Israel.
According to the scriptures, the Jews were not enemies of Israel, they were the enemies of the gospel.
Rom 11:1(KJV) I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.
Rom 11:2(KJV) God hath not cast away his people which he foreknew. Wot ye not what the scripture saith of Elias? how he maketh intercession to God against Israel, saying,
Rom 11:3(KJV) Lord, they have killed thy prophets, and digged down thine altars; and I am left alone, and they seek my life.

Rom 11:26(KJV) And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:
Rom 11:27(KJV) For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.
Rom 11:28(KJV).As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers’ sakes.

If you’re not that familiar with Romans 11, I suggest you check it out, as it explains a great deal about the biblical relationship between the Jew and the Christian according to God's viewpoint. This is a fascinating chapter in the Bible that it seems few are familiar with and explains in great depth a lot of things relative to Israel and God's plan for them and how they should be viewed by Christians..

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
To understand the Jews are actually enemies of Israel it is important to read Ezra and Nehemiah. The Jews were created in Babylon and King Darius, a Jewish hero took on the commission to rebuild the Temple in Jerusalem. He sent the Jews (Babylonian assimilants) back to Jerusalem and they were met with fierce resistance from the Israelites. The Jews had to work with one man assigned to cover his back at all times so that they could fight off assaults from the Israelites. The Jews since their Babylonian creation are enemies of the Israelites.
I believe that the above to be historically inaccurate and at the very least misleading. The Jews were taken from Israel into Babylonian captivity by King Nebuchadnezzar in about 587 BC after they had trashed Israel. The Jews were not created in Babylon as the author states. Daniel, one of the great Jewish prophets of the Old Testament, lived in captivity and eventually became an advisor to Nebuchadnezzar. After Daniel's death, Babylon was conquered by King Cyrus of Persia who then took over. It was at this point that Ezra found favor with Cyrus and was allowed to begin rebuilding the Jewish temple which took place in about 559-530 (Erdmans Handbook to the Bible). Later on during the reign of King Darius (522-486) the temple was actually rebuilt. In 486-465 King Xerxes I (Ahasuerus) now reigning married Queen Esther, a Jewess and would make her uncle Mordecai his grand vizier. It was after the Next Persian King Artaxerxes I (464-423) that Ezra and Nehemiah were finally allowed to return to Jerusalem.

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
And another thing is the misconstruction of the term antisemite.
I do agree with the above statement.

http://mb-soft.com/believe/txo/semites.htm
Semites are peoples who speak Semitic languages; the group includes Arabs, Aramaeans, Jews, and many Ethiopians. In a Biblical sense, Semites are peoples whose ancestry can be traced back to Shem, Noah's eldest son. The ancient Semitic populations were pastoral Nomads who several centuries before the Christian Era were migrating in large numbers from Arabia to Mesopotamia, the coasts of the Mediterranean Sea, and the Nile River delta. Jews and other Semites settled in villages in Judea, southern Palestine.
Present day speakers of Semitic languages are as diverse in physical, psychological, cultural, and sociological characteristics as are speakers of Indo European languages. The most prominent Semites today are Arabs and Jews. They are different in many ways, and they have absorbed a variety of European traits through centuries of migration and trade. The origin of Semitic languages, however, and many similarities in the stories of Islam and Judaism reflect a common ancient history.

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
The Bible symbols, factual families and figures or not depict that Ham's descendants are the blacks of northern Africa.
This may be mythological and is something that is used by several Christian extremist racist groups in order to justify their hatred of blacks. If this were true then it would be somewhat of a blow to evolutionist theory as they claim that different races were living in different parts of the world (contradicts Biblical account of Adam and Eve being the parents of all mankind). Since we know that Ham was the brother of Shem and Japeth (all sons of Noah) this would lend credence to the Biblical account of creation as Ham would have had to migrate to Northern Africa where his descendants would have become darker in color should this account be factual. Interestingly, it is likely that Shem and Japeth were probably not white (at least heavily tan since that is the norm for the people of that land to is it not?). Can the evolutionists have it both ways?

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
Shem's descendants stayed in the Fertile Crescent around the Mediterranean Sea and Japheth's descendants went north into Russia. The Ashkenazim are not Semitic (of Shem) at all. They are Japhetic. Over 95% of all Jews today are Ashkenazim, not Sephardim (a large sect that settled in Gaul [France]). A term generally applied to Ashkenazim is Hungarian Jew and this huge majority of the genetic Jewish population is Arthur Koestler's The Thirteenth Tribe - the Khazarians who converted to Judaism at the Half-Week of Daniel (1260 years after the MENE, MENE, TEKEL, UPHARSIN incident). My point being that it is nonsense to consider a genetic bloodline into Judaism the criteria, especially since all the geneologies were destroyed around 70 AD anyway.
The Jews were scattered throughout the world (Diaspora) but to say that the genetic bloodline did not exist is not true, maybe it would be difficult to determine but it had to exist somewhere. To say that there were no records may or may not be true but I believe records were still kept and a number of them were not totally destroyed, this is what Nehemiah and Ezra found in the temple ruins as they were rebuilding it and records were kept while in captivity, certainly while under Persian rule. The Jews were very meticulous along these lines, particularly the priests and the scribes (of which Ezra was one).

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
Leaving us with theology and religion being the basis for being Jewish, Mel Gibson is a Jew of a large sect that is rejected by those Jews who reject Jesus Christ as the Messiah of God.
I'm sorry David, but I don't really see this. Perhaps the Jews may look at it this way (although I doubt it) but certainly Christians (even if they look at Christianity as a religion) do not view themselves as a Jewish sect, at least I believe that most of them don’t. This I realize is just my opinion can certainly be argued against. Mel Gibson if anything is a Roman Catholic offshoot (sect if you will) as I understand that he started his own church over in California which is supposedly based on Roman Catholicism with some minor differences.

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
So Mel's drunken utterances against Jews and accusing them of being the cause of all wars etc. would probably be better placed accusing them, himself included of producing a lot of Hollywood movies. He would have saved a lot of reputation without all the confusion about identity, including his own.

There's no doubt that Mel Gibson screwed up immensely. He lost a great deal of credibility with that foolish act and this gives rise to the radical Jews who have been claiming all along that he was anti-Semitic as a result of his movie (I didn't feel that the Passion was anti-Semitic, or anti-Jewish at all). I personally thought his portrayal of the Roman soldiers was just as bad if not worse than he portrayed the Jews. Not to mention that most of Hollywood is run by people of Jewish descent. There are many saying he’ll never get another job there.

We may just agree to disagree on some of this as I do respect your opinion and your intellect David.

Respectfully,

2tim215
2 Tim 2:15(KJV) tudy to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-01-2006, 05:18 PM
David Merrill's Avatar
David Merrill David Merrill is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,327
Quote:

If you’re not that familiar with Romans 11, I suggest you check it out, as it explains a great deal about the biblical relationship between the Jew and the Christian according to God's viewpoint. This is a fascinating chapter in the Bible that it seems few are familiar with and explains in great depth a lot of things relative to Israel and God's plan for them and how they should be viewed by Christians..

You are resorting exclusively to Paul's weaponry formed against the Roman Empire occupying Israel. I already cited Ezra and Nehemiah, clearly showing Jews to be enemies of the native Israelites who stayed in the Land of Israel.

Quote:
The Jews were taken from Israel into Babylonian captivity by King Nebuchadnezzar in about 587 BC after they had trashed Israel. The Jews were not created in Babylon as the author states.

That is where you are incorrect. Israelites were captured and taken to Babylon. Those who returned returned after 70+ years were Jews. The authoritative doctrine of Jews today is still The Babylonian Talmud. Here is the scriptural proof of that:

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ChosenSeed.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...References.jpg

Quote:
The Jews were not created in Babylon as the author states.

I just proved otherwise and this supports that you are in "prophetic infancy" according to the wisdom of the opening quotation from Dr. Guinness.

Quote:
It was at this point that Ezra found favor with Cyrus and was allowed to begin rebuilding the Jewish temple which took place in about 559-530 (Erdmans Handbook to the Bible). Later on during the reign of King Darius (522-486) the temple was actually rebuilt.

Correct. I failed to mention Cyrus and believe that the hostility proving Jews to be enemies of Israel to be mostly about that earlier timeframe - the Book of Ezra. It was the King Darius timeframe that started this timeline:

http://ecclesia.org/forum/images/sui...elCalendar.jpg
Daniel's Calendar
http://ecclesia.org/forum/images/sui...anielBooks.jpg
Daniel's Books
http://ecclesia.org/forum/images/suitors/Scythian.jpg
Darius conquers Scythians
http://ecclesia.org/forum/images/suitors/Khazar.jpg

And that Week corresponds exactly to Intifada on the Temple Mount in 2000 too. 3.5 years following the default in foreclosure on the Christians through 501(C)(3) alliance.

Quote:
In a Biblical sense, Semites are peoples whose ancestry can be traced back to Shem, Noah's eldest son.

That is what I said. So the descendants of Ashkenaz are Japhetites, not Semites. Mel should have been declared anti-Japhetic, not antisemitic.

Quote:
Since we know that Ham was the brother of Shem and Japeth (all sons of Noah) this would lend credence to the Biblical account of creation as Ham would have had to migrate to Northern Africa where his descendants would have become darker in color should this account be factual.

Or his children migrated to Africa.

Quote:
The Jews were scattered throughout the world (Diaspora) but to say that the genetic bloodline did not exist is not true, maybe it would be difficult to determine but it had to exist somewhere.

I think it is in Ezra that we find a to establish a genetic lineage one must have records.

Quote:
The Jews were very meticulous along these lines...

Agreed. However a Roman campaign to destroy the Jews took care of that.

Quote:
Perhaps the Jews may look at it this way (although I doubt it) but certainly Christians (even if they look at Christianity as a religion) do not view themselves as a Jewish sect, at least I believe that most of them don’t. This I realize is just my opinion can certainly be argued against.

I think it is the Jews who do not feel this way. I suppose there are Christians who argue that Jesus was not a Jew.


Regards,

David Merrill.

Last edited by David Merrill : 08-01-2006 at 05:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-01-2006, 05:34 PM
RevokeTheTrust's Avatar
RevokeTheTrust RevokeTheTrust is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 96
Everyone takes a drunk man's word as gospel?

Everyone takes a drunk man's word as gospel?

Greetings and blessings, ya'll!

I reprimand every one of you for mocking a man that was near convalescant. It's no different than mocking a mentally-ill man in a nuthouse, just because he's mentally-ill despite having caused to damage to someone's caskette. I take notice from that Yew as would rather give him a tickette to the local actor's guild instead of summoning a friend that would help him to his whereabouts. I am certain many of you were just licking your forearms when you hear of prey to pounce your in-sect upon. Given that COP or POLICE OFFICER was lieing when he said he could smell "Alcohol" on Mel's breath, because Alcohol has no odor and the unoathed creature actually smelled the "additives" unrelated to Alcohol, there were better questions that could have been asked. Would brother Mel need an assistant to help him return to whereaver waypoint he had planned to continue, and where is the complaint as to damaged property to warrant the seizure and search? Over 50 years ago, if someone had been found swerving to compete against the Alcohol, they would've been admonished to "go back to your house faster."

Instead, we get another example of a sloppy man taking advantage of a sloppy man, and gospel being derived to support the other despite both of their acts of tresspass and dishonour. I've seen drunk men direct their vessel better than the people at Little Saigon, California.

I'm not a fanatic to Mel either. I'm always hoping one of those actors found drunk would just start acting to their adversary as in a movie...like saying, "Freedom" or "Get your ass to mars" or "Four Score and Seven Year'go"

M. Gregory Thomas
__________________
Small Craft Advisory Warning: due to High Seas, the Stripes will be lowered until Ordinance is subdued. For the unfettered everyone-else, just shift the POV 90 degrees rite to avoid the Moors at Salvage.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-01-2006, 05:54 PM
David Merrill's Avatar
David Merrill David Merrill is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,327
Quote:
I reprimand every one of you for mocking a man that was near convalescant.

I don't feel reprimanded. The point I was making was that he professes to be a Christian, which is a sect of Judaism and let out his feelings against Jews.


Regards,

David Merrill.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-01-2006, 07:41 PM
RevokeTheTrust's Avatar
RevokeTheTrust RevokeTheTrust is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 96
Uhm, err, Hello Occifer. What's the prooblem?

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
I don't feel reprimanded. The point I was making was that he professes to be a Christian, which is a sect of Judaism and let out his feelings against Jews.


Regards,

David Merrill.

Is your I a David Merrill, or me? The people in the Christ don't bear self-witness. As well, the presumptions in Code does more to bear witness of whomever is being layed dormant to motion of the artifice by said Code, as is a book evidence of fingers to page through it. If a Jew whipped out a ham sandwitch and chowed-down while saying he was a Jew, then it was the sandwhich that bore witness to disqualify him? You've taught me a good amount, David Merrill. Surely you comprehend that even the smallest of pebbles under one's feet would bear witness if their soles are Holy or Covered.

Application of the Image determines how an actor would bend the Image, and the financing by whomever is surety to the action (sign). Did Mel hold Court to decide and agree to enter a court to manipulate a corporate-sole to act as a drunkard? In this case, did a corporation pray to Mel (a sound mind with God)? After all, SUPPLEMENTS TO CERTAIN ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME CLAIMS: Rule B. In Personam Actions: Attachment and Garnishment, (1) When Available; Complaint, Affidavit, Judicial Authorization, and Process. In an in personam action:

(a) If a defendant is not found within the district, a verified complaint may contain a prayer for process to attach the defendant's tangible or intangible personal property--up to the amount sued for--in the hands of garnishees named in the process.

At the moment, that alleged "Officer" was not the complainant but the man wearing the mis-placed officer's clothing was the complainant. His presentment was somewhat blinded by the Uniform. Officers don't complain, they just follow orders right? I have a hearing to attend as a character witness for a friendly Sheik, him in a dispute with a parking facility where the Parking Attendant tried to complain that part of the surety to enter was the vessel become their company's motor vehicle despite the company having no interest and the Parking Attendant to kangaroo between office and complainant. It was somthing to express dissatisfaction for lack of disclosure, though the parking-tickette to enter the garage would tell all for what was agreed.

Sea you around, brother David!

M. Gregory Thomas
__________________
Small Craft Advisory Warning: due to High Seas, the Stripes will be lowered until Ordinance is subdued. For the unfettered everyone-else, just shift the POV 90 degrees rite to avoid the Moors at Salvage.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-01-2006, 08:10 PM
David Merrill's Avatar
David Merrill David Merrill is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,327
I would have to muster the courage to even try competing with that kind of poetry.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Some questions about Jesus BoyntonStu Religion 66 01-07-2007 10:05 PM
State v. Gibson - Anyone care to comment? planetmark Travel 19 05-23-2006 12:27 AM
Gibson v. Weber, No. 04-3932 [8th Cir. December 15, 2005] J.W. Appellate Decisions 0 12-15-2005 09:28 PM
Anti-christ francis Religion 31 11-03-2005 11:05 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:30 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2008 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer