Years ago I decided that Stephen simply misunderstands the nature of international banking.
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/queen.htm
Quote:
By: Stephen Kimbol Ames
Queen Elizabeth controls and has amended U.S. Social Security, as follows:
S.I. 1997 NO.1778 The Social Security ( United States of America)
Order 1997 Made 22nd of July 1997 coming into force 1st September 1997. At the Court at Buckingham Palace the 22nd day of July 1997. Now, therefore Her Majesty an pursuance of section 179 (1) (a) and (2) of the Social Security Administration Act of 1992 and all other powers enabling Her in that behalf, is please, by and with advise of Her privy Council, to order, and it is hereby ordered as follows:
"This Order may be cited as the Social Security (United States of America)
Order 1997 and shall come into force on 1st September 1997."
Does this give a new meaning to Federal Judge William Wayne Justice
stating in court that he takes his orders from England? This order goes on to
redefine words in the Social Security Act and makes...
|
Maybe tomorrow I will get down to the repository and see if Congress actually uses verbiage like that in the Congressional Globe? If not, then I will be advising people to avoid this kind of Persephone-on-the-Capitol spin...
Granted I will not prove that Stephen has substituted verbiage in the preamble until tomorrow. In the alternative, if the Queen adopted a plan in the US, that hardly says she is controlling Social Security - more that the US is guiding Social Security and other Western nations are adopting the guidance.
Stephen has one thing correct though. Jesus was not Resurrected from the dead. Did you know that is what Stephen has written Rottweiller?
Regards,
David Merrill.