Rebuttals to Debunking 9/11 Myths

[BOBT12]

Here's a quick review of some key facts

Government Itself Won’t Swear To Official Theory of 9/11

George Washington

OpEd News

May 5, 2008

While many people question the government’s conclusions about 9/11, rest assured that the government agencies tasked with investigating 9/11 are confident that the government’s answer to the following questions is correct:

(1) How could a rag-tag bunch of hijackers penetrate the strongest military in history and disable normal defensive procedures?

(2) How could 3 super-strong, over-engineered buildings become the first modern steel-frame high-rises in history to collapse due to fire, falling at virtually free-fall speed, and exhibiting many indications normally associated with controlled demolition?

At least the government itself is confident about the answers to these questions, right?
Well, actually:

• Bush, Cheney and all other key officials refused to testify under oath, and Bush and Cheney would not even speak to the 9/11 Commission unless they did so together

• The 9/11 Commission admits that the U.S. military intentionally lied about what happened that day, the Commission reached conclusions based on political considerations, and that its conclusions were largely based on third-hand information conveyed through military spokespeople about what severley tortured, crazy people supposedly said

• NIST admits "We are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse"

• FEMA admits that its best hypothesis for why WTC 7 collapsed has only "a low probability of occurring"

It is not very reassuring when the professional whitewashers tasked with defending the government’s version of what happened on 9/11 themselves willing to swear to that version.

http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/
George Washington

George Washington is a pen name. I am using the pen name, with the approval of the publisher, because I have received death threats due to my 9/11 research and writing. I am using a pen name to protect myself and my family.

Emphasis added.

[bell]

Just who is it that is supposed to do answer these 911 questions, whose going to make them?

No one.

Asking the wolf to investigate if the wolf ate the sheep is, not really very bright. Of course the wolfs conclusions will be inconclusive.

So by continuing to ask the wolf to answer questions is outright ridiculous and this only helps to undermine the credibility of the 911 truth movement.

By asking if there are rebels in the hills im essentially asking if anyone knows of anyone who so believes that 911 was a set up that they stopped obeying codes and statutes, paying mortgages, eating processed foods and for the most part discontinued their materially addicted lives. Remember that the pushers who supply this junk are the ones who supposedly brought these towers down and its not likely that their "customers" are going to do anything to stop the flow.

When people believe in this 911 myth so much so that they begin to actually do something about it then maybe ill give them a bit more credibility but until then ill donate a box a tissues to the movement.

[BOBT12]

Originally Posted by bell

Just who is it that is supposed to do answer these 911 questions, whose going to make them?

The people.

Originally Posted by bell

No one.

Asking the wolf to investigate if the wolf ate the sheep is, not really very bright. Of course the wolfs conclusions will be inconclusive.

This is why it is up to the people to draw reasonable conclusions, "9-11 was an Inside Job"!

As Churchill put it in his famous speech:

Never give up....

NEVER GIVE UP....

NEVER GIVE UP!