Rebuttals to Debunking 9/11 Myths

[weishaupt1776]

Has there been any responses/rebuttals to the book, Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up to the Facts , yet ?

The authors and editors of Popular Mechanics have wussed at any public face to face debate on the radio or at conferences.

[BOBT12]

Originally Posted by weishaupt1776

Has there been any responses/rebuttals to the book, Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up to the Facts , yet ?

What myths/facts do they debunk? I haven't read the book, however, I have heard about shortcomings of the book at a conference supported by the Free Enterprise Society.

The authors and editors of Popular Mechanics have wussed at any public face to face debate on the radio or at conferences.

Of course there's a huge amount of factual information supporting the idea that there's more to 9-11 than the official government version.

[weishaupt1776]

Rebuttal to Debunking 911 Myths


here's a good google research trail about counters to the book on 911truth.org
More Rebuttals to Debunking 911 Myths

Even More More Rebuttals to Debunking 911 Myths

another on Debunking 911 Myths

NOTE: The reason I created hyper links wiht the title of the book "Debunking 911 Myths", is because these links will place higher on google than the actual book links if alot of people click on them, so click away and copy/paste this code in other forums by hittin the quote feature on this post.

If we click on these everyday, and repost these hyperlinks elsewhere (especially the first one), these will pop up more than amazon sales for the book (possibly)

[BOBT12]

Originally Posted by weishaupt1776

Rebuttal to Debunking 911 Myths


here's a good google research trail about counters to the book on 911truth.org
More Rebuttals to Debunking 911 Myths

Even More More Rebuttals to Debunking 911 Myths

NOTE: The reason I created hyper links wiht the title of the book "Debunking 911 Myths", is because these links will place higher on google than the actual book links if alot of people click on them, so click away and copy/paste this code in other forums by hittin the quote feature on this post.

If we click on these everyday, and repost these hyperlinks elsewhere (especially the first one), these will pop up more than amazon sales for the book (possibly)

Thanks for the rich information, weis. The google information is a nice extra.

[weishaupt1776]

http://www.pacinlaw.org/awareness/911_mysteries.php

[weishaupt1776]

http://www.rense.com/general62/deun.htm

I dunno how LAwdog, SHoonra, and "their kind" can sleep at night by supporting the Government's Conspiracy Theory now that the Pop Mech book has been thoroughly & figuratively "prison sexed up"

particularly in the 361 page debunking 911 debunking

[Lawdog]

Originally Posted by weishaupt1776

http://www.rense.com/general62/deun.htm

I dunno how LAwdog, SHoonra, and "their kind" can sleep at night by supporting the Government's Conspiracy Theory now that the Pop Mech book has been thoroughly & figuratively "prison sexed up"

particularly in the 361 page debunking 911 debunking

The guy who wrote the book you linked to, David Ray Griffin, is a retired professor of religion and theology who used to teach at lower-tier schools like the University of Dayton. He has no scientific or engineering credentials.

The editors of Popular Mechanics consulted literally dozens of scientists and engineers, many with Ph.D.'s, all of whom were happy to let their names be listed as contributors.

You want to believe some third-rate theology professor, go ahead. I'll stick with the scientists and engineers.

[Tigron-X]

Originally Posted by Lawdog

You want to believe some third-rate theology professor, go ahead. I'll stick with the scientists and engineers.

Seems like you're dismissing the report before even reading it.

[weishaupt1776]

Originally Posted by Lawdog

. . . He has no scientific or engineering credentials.

and what are the credentials of the authors of the Pop Mech Puff piece?

Originally Posted by Lawdog

The editors of Popular Mechanics consulted literally dozens of scientists and engineers, many with Ph.D.'s, all of whom were happy to let their names be listed as contributors.

And DRG consulted many with high credentials, and their research is footnoted and documented most carefully

Some (a fraction) of his sources:
http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org/
http://www.ae911truth.org/


All of these people are working pilots, engineers, and architects who have PHD's also

So are these people less qualified than the Pop Mech sources?

___YES____NO

Originally Posted by Lawdog

You want to believe some third-rate theology professor, go ahead. I'll stick with the scientists and engineers.

You want to believe some puff piece that evades major points written by people who have family ties with Deutschlandt Security, then go ahead

If you were really objective about this whole thing, you would get DRG's book and compare it with the POP MECH Puff piece, and then report your findings

You are becoming what you hate, LAWDOG

You have come to a conclusion first and then are working backwards

One of these days, in this life or the next, you are going to realize that you believed one of the HUGEST LIES in the ENTIRE HISTORY OF THE WORLD!!!

Tough to swallow, I know

[BOBT12]

Originally Posted by weishaupt1776

and what are the credentials of the authors of the Pop Mech Puff piece?


And DRG consulted many with high credentials, and their research is footnoted and documented most carefully

Some (a fraction) of his sources:
http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org/
http://www.ae911truth.org/


All of these people are working pilots, engineers, and architects who have PHD's also

So are these people less qualified than the Pop Mech sources?

___YES____NO


You want to believe some puff piece that evades major points written by people who have family ties with Deutschlandt Security, then go ahead

If you were really objective about this whole thing, you would get DRG's book and compare it with the POP MECH Puff piece, and then report your findings

You are becoming what you hate, LAWDOG

You have come to a conclusion first and then are working backwards

One of these days, in this life or the next, you are going to realize that you believed one of the HUGEST LIES in the ENTIRE HISTORY OF THE WORLD!!!

Tough to swallow, I know

Thanks weis.

Originally Posted by Tigron-X

Seems like you're dismissing the report before even reading it.

I totally agree.

Whatever happened to the lost art of thinking for one's self?