Go to the members section and download the Clyde Hyde Default Course
Follow the instructions I posted in order to understand the process
Default every mutha out there
Get names, dates, places straight in your affidavit
Don't cite any laws, just facts
EX
"Affiant witnessed Mary Jane, of CPS kidnapping my child on or about the date & time of June 13, 2007 @ 10 A.M."
"Affiant is not in receipt of any material fact, evidence, or documentation which would demonstrate that CPS can kidnap a child when the parent doesn't name it; and Affiant believes that none exists"
That's called Negative Avertment
Start some of your affirmations with
Affiant is not in receipt of any material fact, evidence, or documentation which would demonstrate that (insert your allegation) ; and Affiant believes that none exists"
Look up your state laws on kidnapping and draft up a lawsuit PRONTO !!
__________________ THE DOWNLOADS SECTION IS BROKEN & WILL NEVER BE FIXED, SO STOP BUGGING ME !
Go to the members section and download the Clyde Hyde Default Course
Follow the instructions I posted in order to understand the process
Default every mutha out there
Get names, dates, places straight in your affidavit
Don't cite any laws, just facts
EX
"Affiant witnessed Mary Jane, of CPS kidnapping my child on or about the date & time of June 13, 2007 @ 10 A.M."
"Affiant is not in receipt of any material fact, evidence, or documentation which would demonstrate that CPS can kidnap a child when the parent doesn't name it; and Affiant believes that none exists"
That's called Negative Avertment
Start some of your affirmations with
Affiant is not in receipt of any material fact, evidence, or documentation which would demonstrate that (insert your allegation) ; and Affiant believes that none exists"
Look up your state laws on kidnapping and draft up a lawsuit PRONTO !!
Excellent advice. Affidavits should ALWAYS be negative avermants if it is YOUR case.
__________________
RIP Vajo Jnr.
Valentine A.J. Olszak Jr. (1944 - 2007)
Those other details are important to getting Baby back with Mom. More specifically, agreements and obligations already signed to. That is about all I can say.
On the face of it, those "agreements" appear to be void due to thread, duress, and coercion.
Sincerely,
Christopher Theodore: Rhodes
__________________ Note: It is a custom recognized by many People to use a ":" (colon) between one's name and their FAMILY name, and is used to segregate the name pertaining to the natural sovereign man, "Christopher Theodore," from the FAMILY name, "RHODES" (an implied trust), and further, both from the name of the resulting constructive trust, "CHRISTOPHER THEODORE RHODES".
You are smart to do the defaults separately.. one for hospital employees... and later, a default for the CPS workers, ect.
Always take it in baby steps.. no sense in provoking the criminals any more than is necessary..
Initally, use tems other than kidnapping.. there will be plenty of time to be nasty, if need be....
For instance.. your right to raise (inculcate) your children is being "impinged" by agents and employees.... ect.
Quote:
The right of a parent to raise his children has long been recognized as a fundamental constitutional right, "far more precious than property rights." Stanley v Illinois, 405 U.S. 645, 651 (1972), quoting May v. Anderson, 345, U.S. 528, 533 (1953); Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535, 541, (1942); Meyer v Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923).
"it is well settled that, quite apart from the guarantee of equal protection, if a law "impinges upon a fundamental right explicitly or implicitly secured by the Constitution it is presumptively unconstitutional." - Harris v. McRae, 448 US 297, 312 (1980).
fundamental = This word is applied to those laws which are the foundation of society. Those laws by which the exercise of power is restrained and regulated, are fundamental. The Constitution of the United States is the fundamental law of the land. See Wolff, Inst. Nat. §984. Bouvier's 1856
For HIS Glory,
Akira
__________________
I'm not a rapist, I'm a defacto lover !
"Damn democracy. It is a fraudulent term used, often by ignorant persons but no less often by intellectual fakers, to describe an infamous mixture of socialism, miscegenation, graft, confiscation of property and denial of personal rights to individuals whose virtuous principles make them offensive." Westbrook Pegler: New York Journal American, 1/25/51, entitled "Upholds Republic of U.S. Against Phony Democracy, Democracy in the U.S. Branded Meaningless"
Thank-you all for helping with this huge problem, I am going to read all that was suggested, I have a question, today has been a very trying day, this couple has had more than enough tragedy in there life since their son was stolen from them, babys mom was admitted to the hospital, with very bad complications from the pregnancy, and not doing very well, and the dad is trying to spend as much time as possible with her between working and handling this situation with their baby, My question is: I am the babys grand mother, can I approach children services with the asservation and demand the baby be released for the dad? Just as he would? I am thinking, if I had a release from dad, to give me the right to handle all affairs for him I might be able to. Today before the mom went in the hospital she called the hospital that the birth took place and asked if they give the new moms a record of birth and they told her no, so I am going to try to do it for her, neither her or the dad can do it now with everything that has been going on, so I will draft something up to try and make it work.
Tonight I was sitting with the babys dad, who is my son, all he kept saying is, "look at all my babys things" and showing them to me, saying "but no baby, wheres my son?" now his moms in the hospital and may not ever get to see him again, I was just in tears, They are so exhausted, I think the two of them are giving up all hope, and I just can't sit around and let this happen.
May God step in and save them, for all his glory.
If something happens to mom she would have only spent a total of maybe 3 days with her newborn son of the 15 days of his wonderful small life.
I'm sorry for going on with this, I want everyone out there to know how this system is ruining three of Gods children, that just wanted to have a happy life with no intervention from blood thirsty demons.
I REALLY want to discourage trying a UCC pleading in a child custody proceeding. Custody of one's child is NOT a commercial transaction and UCC will not help. But if you indicate to the judge, by this ploy, that you regard your child as an article of commerce, it will be a Very Serious strike AGAINST you.
Once again, this is important enough to invest in a lawyer with a track record in such cases.
I REALLY want to discourage trying a UCC pleading in a child custody proceeding. Custody of one's child is NOT a commercial transaction and UCC will not help. But if you indicate to the judge, by this ploy, that you regard your child as an article of commerce, it will be a Very Serious strike AGAINST you.
Once again, this is important enough to invest in a lawyer with a track record in such cases.
The objective of a positive asseveration properly published is quite the opposite of what Shoonra implies. It would be a way to gather testimony that the State in corporation status is contemplating the child be private credit property/chattel in commerce. Not the other way around.
Should you invest enough money for an attorney who will do you any good, you will likely just find that a complete waste of your money. Attorneys, in the past five years are nothing but collections agents. They will take your money and do nothing or maybe just sell you up the river.
Here is a good example of gathering testimony: (attached). The chief judge presents a contract offer - I acknowledge that you have not appeared; but if you will please acquiesce to the proposal that acquiring the US' cognizance of your lack of voluntary appearance will establish that your letter to the district court has no effect on this traffic matter and we can proceed with this prosecution..." The suitor immediately recognized the presentment as hostile and refused it for cause - and put the chief judge's testimony before the US in his evidence repository - see the clerk instruction attached.
Regards,
David Merrill.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoonra
It is worth noting that the fealty to the Pope, which you cited for its explicit mention of the Templar abbey in Dover, is the legal basis for the invalidation of the Magna Carta after it was sealed at Runnymede.
During discussion about the Treaty of 1213 and the Magna Charta (1215).
after the baby was sent to another hospital she got a call from children services telling her they where taking custody of the baby because she had a positive drug test that was performed without her knowledge, now lets not form an opinion,
the worker like a typical gov. official said we don't do things in writing and there wasn't time because if she didn't cooperate with them she would lose the baby, well from all the stress they put her through she ended up going back in the hospital for high blood pressure
What business does "children services" have in the hospital? Do they have a contract with the hospital?
It sounds like the hospital is allowing this "children services" to kidnap children. Who is in charge of the hospital's operations? You need NAME(S) of people at the hospital who can be held accountable for "losing" your child. Affidavits, asseverations, defaults--what good are they if NO ONE is held accountable for your child?
Boy, I'll tell ya, I'd be on that hospital administrator's ass in no time flat. I'd ask see the contract the hospital has with "children's services". You need a copy of it because you need NAMES! If there is no contract, then what business do they have in the hospital? The hospital's administrator then becomes the liable person.
I would even call the police and make missing child report. Nobody has the right to take a new born from hospital based on some drug test that has yet to be seen. You need a copy of that drug test too. How do you know they are telling you the truth about that drug test, or even if there was drug test? They could be making everything up.
They always make the mother or mother and father jump through hoops such as making them go to "drug rehabilitation." Where is the test?? You want to see it.
Linear Mode
