Family Rights Discuss Family Rights such as Home Schooling, Raising Children, and dealing with the CPS (Child Molestation Service) seizure of children.


Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > Family Rights
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-05-2005, 07:57 PM
hooded50's Avatar
hooded50 hooded50 is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 95
Putting the brakes on DMV. . . . . . .

I'll start from the top and work down.

The "State" you live in is a fictitious business entity, doing business for profit through the use of contracts.

The "Courts" are Courts in and for the "State" you live in. This, by extension makes the "Courts" also fictitious business entities doing business for profit through the use of contracts.

"Police Officers" are officers of the "State" or "City" you live in. This means that they work for, and are agents for, the State or City you live in. This, in effect, means that a "police officer" must be able to show a contract whereby you have agreed to do business with him, and he must be able to state a claim against you upon which relief may be granted. If he didn't have a contract to do business with you, then it is IMPOSSIBLE for him to state such a claim.

Some judges will hold up a copy of your driver's license, and triumphantly proclaim "Here's your contract!". There's one problem. The UCC holds that in order for a contract to be legally enforceable, it must have been entered into knowingly, willingly, and intelligently by all parties, and all parties must have had full knowledge of the terms and conditions of that contract. Each side must have made full disclosure of the terms and conditions.

Now, ask yourself this. When you applied for your driver's license, did the "State" fully explain to you that you were giving up your sovereign rights to drive without a license, and trading it for the "privilege" of being monitored by the state? Did the "State" explain to you that, by signing that contract, that you agreed to be under the admiralty jurisdiction of the "State" "Courts"? NO. As such, the "contract" between you and the "State" is what the UCC deems "unconscionable", because you did not truly understand all of the terms and conditions before you entered. There is simply a failure by the "State" to give a good full faith disclosure on the terms and conditions of the contract.

The "State" concealed these facts on purpose. They wanted you to just sign up and move on. They told you that "the law" required you under every circumstance to have a license before you drive a motor vehicle on the roads [for an eye opening definition of "motor vehicle", see 18 USC 31(a)(6)]. Such was a lie. The laws of every "State" say that no "person" shall operate a "motor vehicle" without a license. Look up the definition of "person". A "person" is defined as a "legal entity created by the state". The Courts have also held that the definition of a "person" does not include a "sovereign".

At 18 USC 31(a)(6), a motor vehicle is defined as a vehicle that is drawn by its own power, and used for commercial purposes. Do you use your vehicle to make a living on the roads? Are you a fictitious legal entity created by the "State"? Did you willingly agree to sacrifice your common law rights when you got your "driver's license"?

When a police officer pulls you over, the operation is simple.

1. Ask him if he has come to uphold his oath of office and protect your Constitutional common law rights. If he says yes, he's lying. Police officers do not have Contitutional Oaths of Office as they are not Constitutionally elected by the people, and he is there to protect his company (the "State", not you)

2. Ask him if you are under arrest. (Some officers will say that you're not under arrest, but they are "detaining" you. This is a LIE. If you are not under arrest, then you are FREE TO GO. If they tell you you are not free to go, then they have placed you under arrest, and they had better be able to prove jurisdiction over you, or risk false arrest charges)

3. Ask him if he works for the "City" or "State" (both are fictitious business entities). He'll have to say 'yes', and in doing so, he's admitted that he's an agent for a fictitious business.

4. Ask him if he has a claim against you upon which relief may be granted. If he asks you to explain, tell him that you cannot give him legal advice, and repeat your question to him about having a claim. If he says he doesn't understand, tell him he'd better call a lawyer before proceeding.

5. Ask him to see his police identification, and copy down all of his information. Get in the habit of carrying a digital voice recorder with you, and record all conversations with police in their entirety. Police almost always make damning admissions.

6. Tell him that you intend to take non judicial action against him for any wrongs he commits against you, and that because you have no contract to do business with the Court, the Court will be powerless to save him.

The possibilities are endless. You can have great fun with the cops. By the time you ask them this calibur of questions, they'll be tripping to get a "State" or "City" attorney on the phone because they'll be nervous about not knowing what you're talking about.

Anyone with any questions can feel free to email me at hooded50@juno.com

Last edited by hooded50 : 08-05-2005 at 08:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-06-2005, 05:11 PM
scottinalaska's Avatar
scottinalaska scottinalaska is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Alaska
Posts: 332
Well stated, Hooded50.

We'd love to hear some responses that you have received from the cop when you have posed these questions to him. I do always carry a voice recorder now and reviewing them after a stop is excellent practice. So far, the traffic stop is dealing with a huge ego that is intent on slapping on cuffs if you don't stop asking questions! Gotta hate that. Share with us an experience or anyone else who has asked a similarly legitimate question.

scottinalaska
__________________
All men die, few live. This little hobby of fighting tyranny is driving my wife nuts.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fed's Putting Me Under The Gun! Grench Court 15 07-11-2005 10:26 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:03 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2008 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer