Adoption

[juststartingout]

We have the right to contract with whomever we want - just stating that as my forethought for the following:

Is there any way a family can go about adopting without having the government involved in this day and age? I mean, I know that it is *possible* but does it ever happen? How hard would it be to accomplish such a thing? How does one even begin to start looking?

It isn't anyone's business, IMO, if I want to adopt and how I choose to establish rules in my family and what the income is etc. If I feel led to adopt, I should have that right and no one should try to stop me.

i also want to adopt, but understand as much as i want another child daughter killed at 3yo, son taken by mother and police told me i would be arrested if i tried to stop her. keep in mind adoption is a fiction which falls into their jurisdiction. im still looking into the matter...but i dont find much.

str8razor

go hard or go home

[Akira]

Originally Posted by juststartingout

We have the right to contract with whomever we want - just stating that as my forethought for the following:

Is there any way a family can go about adopting without having the government involved in this day and age? I mean, I know that it is *possible* but does it ever happen? How hard would it be to accomplish such a thing? How does one even begin to start looking?

It isn't anyone's business, IMO, if I want to adopt and how I choose to establish rules in my family and what the income is etc. If I feel led to adopt, I should have that right and no one should try to stop me.

It would seem to me (IMHO).... if a sovereign, wants to adopt another sovereign's child, there is no problem.

If a sovereign wants to adopt a slaves child, then the sovereign must work with the slave's owner.

If a slave, wants to adopt another slaves child... then, unless both have the same master, the masters must talk.


FYI: I was adopted, as were my 'non-blood siblings' (oxymoron?). I have met my birthmother, and know her well.

For HIS Glory,
Akira

[juststartingout]

makes total sense and was along the lines of my thoughts.

here's another one for y'all:

if the child is born out of wedlock, there has been is no marriage permitted by the state - is that child still considered property of the state even w/ a bc? i ask b/c it's my understanding that it's the marriage liscense that gives the children as the property of the state, not the birth certificate.