Stop the VAWA! How?

How to stop the gender biased VAWA when more than half the violence is created by women and the worse offenders of violence against children are women?

Simple.

Keep track of what "NOW" is doing.

In this case, they make it easy for us to stop this male bias that is totally, completely anti-Constitutional. They even give us a telephone number to call our representatives!

If you don't do it, no one will. We can stop this misandry. Just pick up the telephone, e-mail, snail mail and fax your protests!

"You can reach any senator through the Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121."

Pick up the phone and stop the insanity of all the gender lies perpetuated and propagated by militant feminists!

Do your part. Pass this around!

Eric

VAWA Expires Tomorrow 9/30 - Take Action NOW!

The Violence Against Women Act is set to expire tomorrow, Sept. 30. Please call your senators' offices immediately to make sure that U.S. women don't have to suffer without the lifesaving provisions of VAWA. You can reach any senator through the Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121.

In light of VAWA's overwhelming victory in the House on Wednesday, you may think that Senate passage is assured, but it's not. VAWA will only be brought to the Senate floor and passed if people like you make your voices heard.

Remember that VAWA originally passed the senate UNANIMOUSLY with bi-partisan sponsorship, so don't hesitate to call conservative senators.

Call your senators' offices right away and talk to a staff member. Tell them that you want the Senator to help bring VAWA (S 1197) to the floor on Friday, Sept. 30, and to vote "yes" on this important act. Make sure they know that you are a constituent in their state and you vote!

If you must, leave a message on their answering machine, but make your call NOW! Please call 202-224-3121.

There is a suggested script below, or you can read more about this important issue.

"Hi, this is [name] from [city, state]. As your constituent and a women's rights supporter, I'm calling to ask [senator's name] to bring the Violence Against Women Act -- S 1197 -- to the floor on Friday Sept. 30 before it expires and to vote YES for final passage. The women of our state and this country are counting on you."

If you have the time, please send NOW an email (to now@now.org) to let us know which senators offices you reached and what kind of repsonse you received from their staff -- and even if you left a message. Your feedback helps in our lobbying efforts.

Thanks for your time and support on this critical issue!

Kim Gandy
NOW President

How about stopping the VAMA?

Henry Franklin

P.S. You picked the wrong board to spam. We don't have representatives at the number you posted.

ROFLMAO

...it' probably passed again with flying color's.

But, it' only applies to U.S. Citizens!

[fulltitle]

WITHOUT PREJUDICE
In my years of investigative and related experience the assessment and experience has been that I've come across: 1) women who will concealed abuse they have done to children by saying it was an accident or blame a guy or claim 'emotional problems' or through manipulating, 2) women who will hit, spank, hurt, shake and be unecessarily violent toward a child only on the basis of an emotional surge that is unrelated at all to anything that the child did, 3) women get their kids on unnecessary drugs for sympathy (or to utilize the drugs recreationally), 4) women who manifest factitious disorder by proxy.

I have seen cases where women will hit and spank a child for no reason day after day and then when a male so much as raises his voice BUT DOES NO VIOLENCE TO THE CHILD the same women suddenly come across as being 'defenders' of the child.

By no means do I claim herein for all women to be this or that. I am merely alluding to this: there is much mythology about child abuse and that in my experience women have show themselves to be more likely to abuse children since there is a social mythology that some or many women feel would allow them to get away with it and/or cover it up easier.

[Akira]

This is from my website.....

1996 F.B.I. CRIME STATISTICS

published in
'The Report'-Alberta Edition, Feb. 28th, 2000 by
Candis McLean & Walter H. Scheider
Edmonston, Alberta, Canada

1262 American Children 'in families' Killed in 1996

984 Killed by women
278 Killed by men

768 Killed by the Biological Mother
30 Killed by the Biological Father

464 Killed by adults 'in the home' other than the biological parents.


Let's do the math !!

For every child Bio Dad kills, Bio Mom kills 25.6 children


But wait, there's more...

In Canada:

If a Bio Dad kills his child, it's homicide, and he could spend life in prison...

If Bio Mom kills HER child, It's called INFANTCIDE, and carries a max prison term of TWO YEARS !


For HIS Glory,
Akira

[Livefire]

Lets face it.....the system is designed to emasculate men. Men acting as sovereign men are fatal to the system! If that offends any FemiNazis out there....TOO BAD!!!

[wisper]

Anyone know-Is there not sufficient law on the books to cover real objective cases? For instance, the case of an alien needing rescue from an abusive spouse. Men are also abused!Other than the fact that NOW is a sponsor, what else is bad, besides redundant legal code, and more bureaucracy and spending?

Fulltitle,as a recipient of three protection orders one from an a sperated wife who got mad when i did not give her a instant divorce and was contacting me at work even offering sex if i signed.When i didn't accept here phony offers she accussed me of harassing her.The other two from my current wife who has a mental disorder and both occured while she was in a delusion state due a change in ****.Any person could see she was in a delusional state by the blank exagerrated stare that comes with it yet attorneys would still take her money for filing the orders.Akira not susprising but suprising that one could even get those statistics.I would like to see the U.S. numbers.DON'T FOGET HATE CRIMES BILL IS ALSO IN THE SAME STATUS JUST WAITING TO BE PASSED BY SENATE HIDDEN IN CHILD CARE BILL.

Looks as if we have more time to pick up those telephones and start making a difference!

"You can reach any senator through the Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121."

I don't necessarily agree with RADAR and specifically, VAWA because we already had/have laws on the books and still do that cover violence from a Constitutional law viewpoint that requires "guilty beyond a reasonable doubt" as opposed to the nebulous "preponderance of the evidence" as found in Civil Courts.

RADAR, in my opinion, does not believe that we can stop the VAWA behemoth and therefore "settles" by including men in the definition and a recognition that women are at least as violent as men and in many studies, MORE violent.

Eric Ericson
Fathers's Integrity & Rights Movement (FIRM)
FIRM's TV
FIRM's News & Journal
FIRM's NCP Advocate
FIRM's Equality in Parenting Radio Show

This is their announcement:

Senate Puts Off Vote on Controversial VAWA

Despite enormous pressure by VAWA advocates, the Senate failed to
vote on the Violence Against Women Act yesterday. We believe the
reason for the delay is that bill contains a number of contentious
issues. The Senate has now adjourned, and will come back into
session this coming Wednesday.

This is good news for us, because it gives us a few more days to get
our message across.

At this point, this is what we are asking for:

1. The Senate bill needs to include clear and explicit language
that clarifies that male DV victims are entitled to service. The
Senate bill currently has male-inclusive language, but we want to
make it much stronger.
2. The bill needs to remove specific references to women and
girls, to make the language gender-neutral.

Watch for RADAR's Alert coming out this Monday morning.

In the meantime, if you want to contact your Senator at their local
office on Monday or Tuesday, that's fine.

But it's important that we stay on message – see points 1. and 2.
above. If you request other changes to VAWA, it will dilute the key
message that advocates for equal treatment are trying to make.

Don't feed the troll folks.

Nothing to see here.

Henry Franklin