Family Rights Discuss Family Rights such as Home Schooling, Raising Children, and dealing with the CPS (Child Molestation Service) seizure of children.


Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > Family Rights
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-17-2005, 01:03 PM
jjc_is_me
 
Posts: n/a
Child Custody And The Ucc

I Recently Posted A Similar Thread In The Court Forum But I Thought There Might Be Some New Insight From This Group. I Was Recently Told That Filing A Ucc3 For My Son Will Give Me Complete Control Over Him. I Have Been Told That The Ucc3 Will Be Stronger Than The Custody Papers. Does Anyone In Here Know What I Am Being Told To Be True? Any Information Will Be Greatly Appreciated.

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-17-2005, 03:24 PM
Libertarian Libertarian is online now
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 200
Who told you that? Can they point you to any d***ented success stories?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-17-2005, 06:06 PM
jjc_is_me
 
Posts: n/a
The Man Who Signed Me Up For The Ucc Filed A Ucc3 On His Grand Child And How Has Custody Of Him. To Me It Doesnt Make Much Sense
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-18-2005, 01:11 PM
Akira's Avatar
Akira Akira is offline
Sui Juris Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Maine state
Posts: 873
jjc_is_me,

Quote:
Originally Posted by jjc_is_me
Filing A Ucc3 For My Son Will Give Me Complete Control Over Him. I Have Been Told That The Ucc3 Will Be Stronger Than The Custody Papers
I investigated the possiblility of such an approach some 2 years ago, but never did pursue it.

Please invite your friend to Sui Juris, that he might share his techniques, and sUCCesses, for the benefit of all.

If privacy is an issue, he might consider sharing his info, with just a few folks here, so that they, in turn, might teach others.

He can PM or email me directly, if he would like...


For HIS Glory,
Akira
__________________
Akira = Akira-
Counselor in Law (student) - I live it, I don't 'practice'
No post is ever intended as 'legal' advice. Lawful perspectives discussed openly.
"Pro and Con are opposites, this is plainly seen.
If progress means 'to move forward', what does congress mean?" - Nipsy Russel

"It's not the will to win, it's the will to prepare to win." - Bobby Knight

Last edited by Akira : 10-18-2005 at 01:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-18-2005, 06:37 PM
Shoonra Shoonra is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,697
Positively, absolutely, this is a rip-off.

The Uniform Commercial Code deals, as its title suggests, with commercial transactions. The custody of a child is not a commercial transaction.

The custody decisions by a court are governed by only one standard: "the best interests of the child". This may include a great many factors that might not seem very important to one or more of the individuals involved in the case, such as the lifestyle and free time of the prospective parent, the features of the parent's home and hometown (including available schools), and the particular needs and characteristics of the child in question.

Trying this UCC stunt will not only be ineffective, it might persuade the judge that you are not sensible enough to care for a child.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-18-2005, 07:33 PM
HenryBowman
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoonra
The custody decisions by a court are governed by only one standard: "the best interests of the child".
ROFLMAO!!!!

This is the funniest piece of propaganda I have read by any poster.

My side is splitting!





Henry Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-18-2005, 10:00 PM
citizensoldier's Avatar
citizensoldier citizensoldier is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 148
Family law courts are equity courts - the UCC is irrelevant. Marriage is a contract between a man and woman - regardless if they entered into it with the state via a marriage license or without the state in a common law marriage.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-19-2005, 05:20 AM
jjc_is_me
 
Posts: n/a
Well To Tell You The Truth I Dont Know What To Believe. On One Hand I Am Being Told That The Ucc Filing Is Such A Wonderful Thing And On The Other Hand It Seems Like It's Really Kind Of Useless. I Dont Know Which To Believe.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-19-2005, 06:01 AM
citizensoldier's Avatar
citizensoldier citizensoldier is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 148
The UCC is a system on how to conduct business in commerce, which each State has adopted. It doesn't have anything to do with a private contractual agreement, such as a marriage.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-19-2005, 06:15 AM
weishaupt1776's Avatar
weishaupt1776 weishaupt1776 is offline
The Outta Commissiona
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Republic
Posts: 5,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjc_is_me
I Recently Posted A Similar Thread In The Court Forum But I Thought There Might Be Some New Insight From This Group. I Was Recently Told That Filing A Ucc3 For My Son Will Give Me Complete Control Over Him. I Have Been Told That The Ucc3 Will Be Stronger Than The Custody Papers. Does Anyone In Here Know What I Am Being Told To Be True? Any Information Will Be Greatly Appreciated.

Thanks

Cancel contrcts for legal cause, ab initio
(look that up yourself on google)

The contracts ae your marriage license, voters registration, and birht ertificate

AND THEN

Your child's BC

The governmental system in each state was lawful pre-14th Amdmnt in that they were self-governing, free of any interference from DC with a few legitimate exceptions
The 14th Amdmt created a new "Federal citizenship" called U.S. citizenship
Prior to that, there were only State Nationals, in that they were considered to be New Jersians or Floridians as if from a different country

Licenses, BC's, SS#'s, car reg, receiving mail at your house are all U.S. Citizen adhesion contracts which force the presumption that you or anyone else is a Federal Citizen and thus property of DC

To rebut this, drastic measures should be taken to correct your Nationality FROM U.S. Citizen to that of your respective state.

This means, your name can't be on your car reg, no DL, no bank account/credit card, no BC, no DL, no marriage lic, no mail at your house, etc. . .

The UCC thing relies on a commercial concept of "acceptance for value"
If you do that, you are accepting all of that stuff, rather than rejecting it.
I am more comfrtable rejecting it.

Take your pick. There is no DMZ
__________________
THE DOWNLOADS SECTION IS BROKEN & WILL NEVER BE FIXED, SO STOP BUGGING ME !

www.pacinlaw.org ~ www.pacgroups.us
Multi multa, non omnia novit = Many men know many things, no one knows everything.
The De jure Political Group: www.statenationals.net
Do you have concerns about America? www.redamendment.net
Is the government acting in your interest? www.notmygovernment.us
Have you been Deprogrammed? www.deprogram.us


DOWNLOAD THIS COURSE NOW !!

Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:32 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2008 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer