Man Thrown in Jail for Contempt

[Ice]

Maybe "quo warranto" would be effective because of the judge's refusal to abide by the law... and his refusal to adhere to the rules (Plaintiff had to provide proof of claim -- not the other way around).

The point is that the judge is not competent to hold office and proved that by violating the law he took an oath to uphold. And shouldn't a judge know that it is up to the Plaintiff to provide proof that the man is able to pay alimony? And shouldn't the judge also know that by making the statements that the man's mother has assets and could pay the alimony is nothing more than extorting funds from someone that is not obligated nor a party to the suit? (That's tantamount to the judge declaring that any member of suijuris.net must pay this man's alimony -- we're as far removed from being a party as the man's mother is).

Yep, this kind of crap has got to stop. I say that every attempt should be made to have him removed from office.

Maybe quo warranto should be put into use more often. Ya think?

[gldskr]

Ice

The problem is that the judge is an administrative judge and he has no authority to act, only to recommend, which recommendation then gets rubber stamped by a real "judge". The adminisrative judge has no liability in the matter so he is immune to the consequences. The real "judge" is also immune because the contract is the controlling law( the marriage license ). And as we all know, they make the laws up as they go.

gldskr

[Ice]

Better check your code. ALL Administrative Judges are liable in their personal capacity for violations and exceeding their authority.

Using quo warranto can still remove the person from office... and bar him from ever holding any public servants position again.

Ice

[rottweiler]

If it works let me know.

http://www.wealth4freedom.com/law/prison_treatise.shtml

see Jean Keating Work Shop Transcript [pdf file] at the bottom of the page.

[rottweiler]

Admiralty is all debt and it's all civil; it becomes criminal when the prisoner gets a contempt charge when he refuses to pay. They can keep you in jail until you pay the debt. The initial get out of jail bond releases you until you've successfully paid the debt.

Then they put the goods in a warehouse and store them there (prisoners stored in prisons, just like the people stored in the pods in the movie, The Matrix).
http://www.wealth4freedom.com/money/bonded_souls.htm

[squirrel]

You could move over five counties away, send in a money order every month for whatever amount to the agency and not be in contempt. Just fyi.

P.S. moving over five counties away keeps them from comin to get ya.

[masterduke]

Disqualify the Judge and go after the DA as they are all engaged in fraud for starters! Get the "digging up dirt" dvd and the "how to cook a goverment crook" dvd this is THE WEAPON that will expose the bug-eyed jerk in the robe and his accomplices as the crooks they are! They are ALL involved in one Illegal Scam or another!

[rottweiler]

Originally Posted by masterduke

Disqualify the Judge and go after the DA as they are all engaged in fraud for starters! Get the "digging up dirt" dvd and the "how to cook a goverment crook" dvd this is THE WEAPON that will expose the bug-eyed jerk in the robe and his accomplices as the crooks they are! They are ALL involved in one Illegal Scam or another!

You got to know what juridiction you are in. ADMIRALTY! They are collecting a DEBT here. It's all COMMERCIAL all the time. The goods go to warehouse(jail) when the flesh and blood man does not cough up the dough! The same principle applies even if HE was charged with murder in the first degree. It's pure bottomry. HE needs to pay with his exemption or unregister HIMSELF. Lose the FICTION and they have no JURISDICTION! (Johnny Cochrane move over, rottweiler is taking over.) HE needs to get real. I agree with you these agents of the STATE are crooks and do not give a damn about us. They would crawl over their dead mother to fock their sister! They will rot in hell.

The PARTIES have a marriage license right? Then they have entered into a three party contract with the STATE. Their parents registered THEM when they were born right? That berth certificate is a trust between the flesh and blood, the STRAWMAN, and the STATE. The judge ordered the STRAWMAN to pay alimony. HE is in contempt of court because HE is not paying. It does not matter if HE is destitute. HE(the goods) is warehoused until HE pays or the judge decides to release him. The case went from civil to criminal when HE did not obey the court order. The flesh and blood man stands in for the all caps legal fiction and GOES TO JAIL.

The same thing happens when YOU are charged with a crime(all crimes are commercial). THEY own the STRAWMAN because you entered into a cestui que trust with the STATE. You have the beneficial use but they make the rules IT must follow. IT has no rights. You have to unregister yourself, your family and your stuff.

Check this out. Mary Croft explains it the best in a way that is plain as day.
Just read page 21!
http://www.natural-person.ca/pdf/mary_croft.pdf


Please reply back to me and tell me what you think.

[idknow]

Originally Posted by squirrel

You could move over five counties away, send in a money order every month for whatever amount to the agency and not be in contempt. Just fyi.

P.S. moving over five counties away keeps them from comin to get ya.

Why more than "five counties" (no `R' in that word) away?

[idknow]

Originally Posted by rottweiler

You got to know what juridiction you are in. ADMIRALTY! They are collecting a DEBT here. It's all COMMERCIAL all the time. The goods go to warehouse(jail) when the flesh and blood man does not cough up the dough! The same principle applies even if HE was charged with murder in the first degree. It's pure bottomry. HE needs to pay with his exemption or unregister HIMSELF. Lose the FICTION and they have no JURISDICTION! (Johnny Cochrane move over, rottweiler is taking over.) HE needs to get real. I agree with you these agents of the STATE are crooks and do not give a damn about us. They would crawl over their dead mother to fock their sister! They will rot in hell.

The PARTIES have a marriage license right? Then they have entered into a three party contract with the STATE. Their parents registered THEM when they were born right? That berth certificate is a trust between the flesh and blood, the STRAWMAN, and the STATE. The judge ordered the STRAWMAN to pay alimony. HE is in contempt of court because HE is not paying. It does not matter if HE is destitute. HE(the goods) is warehoused until HE pays or the judge decides to release him. The case went from civil to criminal when HE did not obey the court order. The flesh and blood man stands in for the all caps legal fiction and GOES TO JAIL.

The same thing happens when YOU are charged with a crime(all crimes are commercial). THEY own the STRAWMAN because you entered into a cestui que trust with the STATE. You have the beneficial use but they make the rules IT must follow. IT has no rights. You have to unregister yourself, your family and your stuff.

Check this out. Mary Croft explains it the best in a way that is plain as day.
Just read page 21!
http://www.natural-person.ca/pdf/mary_croft.pdf


Please reply back to me and tell me what you think.

Consider the following:

The parents file sign a document and it becomes a contract between the STATE and the name of the party ON the document.
Now, this party is a minor and infant and court opinion is quite clear regarding minors who are party to a contract, unless the minor has a clear understanding of the associated rights, duties and consequences in general and specifically of the contract in question, "the contract *is* avoidable"!!!

So perhaps, this is how one, even an adult, could petition either petition the court or self-nullify the contract.

how's that?