Extortion

[powder]

Has anyone successfully used PN or CPN with the Extortionists? (For the non-divorcees: Maintenance, Child Support, Family Responsibilty Agency, Mob, Extortionists, Thugs, Cheaters, Liers, ...) I could go on.

Anyone done a VOD on them?

[wargamez102]

VOD seem's to be a waste of time.

I am currently in a boat that had water coming up over the sides, and so far I have been able to calm the water enough to locate several identical cases that have been decided in their higher tribunals that indicate that what they're doing to us low level sailor's is nothing more than FRAUD.

After years of riding on different ships, I have decided to go to the Appeals Court for an original action for Superintending Control for an Order to stop the madness.

If one were to do a search on the subject matter of imputation one might find something similar to the following:

http://www.courtofappeals.mijud.net/...L/11231111.htm

I showed up to trial this past week with "Motion to Dismiss" preregistered and low and behold no trial took place. But, I was informed that after lunch the so-called Judge was going to revoke my bond and toss me in the brink if I continued to argue this much with support.

Knowing that I wasn't going to get anywhere there, I decided to get out of that boat, lay low, and then come back this up and coming week with an original action that remove's the mask of their ship and will hopefully dock them to shore for awhile.

Notice: This is not intended to be a vague post!

Crazy Ship of Fools....

[powder]

Thanks for the info wargamz102. You post spoke volumes to me.

I am NOT going to waste my time VOD'ing them.

I am going to pursue this course of action.

1. Send Affidavit to DoJ identifing that I recsind my signature on all government documents including but not limited to birth marriage, health due to misrepresentation and FRAUD on their behalf.
2. Send a Notice and Demand to DoJ (with the above affidavit) noticing them to they intentionally commited fraud on no less than x occasions (certificates for birth, marriage, ...). Failure to respond is acquisence. I will also identify my injures are a minimum of $1,000,000 worth of GOLD per incident.
3. Forward this affidavit to Extortionists with a Notice and Demand to notice they have no legal basis to continue (unless they can cite relevent laws that now apply (post signature recscision). demand cease and desist their actions. Failure to respond, they agree (love it) to be culpable, agree that fraud has been committed, estopped from any further action.

[wargamez102]

Happy Trails/Trials

[idknow]

Originally Posted by powder

Thanks for the info wargamz102. You post spoke volumes to me.

I am NOT going to waste my time VOD'ing them.

I am going to pursue this course of action.

1. Send Affidavit to DoJ identifing that I recsind my signature on all government documents including but not limited to birth marriage, health due to misrepresentation and FRAUD on their behalf.
2. Send a Notice and Demand to DoJ (with the above affidavit) noticing them to they intentionally commited fraud on no less than x occasions (certificates for birth, marriage, ...). Failure to respond is acquisence. I will also identify my injures are a minimum of $1,000,000 worth of GOLD per incident.
3. Forward this affidavit to Extortionists with a Notice and Demand to notice they have no legal basis to continue (unless they can cite relevent laws that now apply (post signature recscision). demand cease and desist their actions. Failure to respond, they agree (love it) to be culpable, agree that fraud has been committed, estopped from any further action.

I heard a news blurb regarding (pseudo-quote)

"states are going to make health insurance mandatory for everyone!"

that's all I heard: my attention was elsewhere.

[charlesa6]

Yep!! I heard the same information in my state too.

[idknow]

Originally Posted by charlesa6

Yep!! I heard the same information in my state too.

did you hear more about it? heh

[dadmoonbunny]

Start with the socialists:
http://www.reason.com/0411/fe.rb.mandatory.shtml

and the CALIFORNIAINS:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...AGPN9KO3G1.DTL

AND FROM THE EAST COAST:http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...toryId=5031511

even CLORADO:
http://www.state.co.us/gov_dir/leg_d...0COVERAGES.pdf

and even the supposedly FREE STATE OF TEXAS:
http://www.tdi.state.tx.us/rules/1229-059.html

So, what I see is basically the moving forward of the socialist agenda and further movement toward the one-world government.

Where each and everyone of us is concerned, I see the need to intrude into thier scheme ONLY in the event of severe life-threatining damage to the body. Most of the damage we suffer on the genetic level has been caused by the influence and intrusion of the chemicals, and "regulations" of the folks that would have us all stay sheep.

[gldskr]

I heard a news blurb regarding (pseudo-quote)

"states are going to make health insurance mandatory for everyone!"

that's all I heard: my attention was elsewhere.

Perhaps the next time you are bored and need a receptacle for your one liners, you could find a suitable thread, as this one is now 720 degrees and perpedicular to its original intent. Just a thought.


wargames

The mandate of the system is for everyone to succumb and apparently your marriage license and BC revocation docs were unsuccessful. Any insight as to why, other than the obvious corruption?

I also had a "Motion to Dismiss" hearing this past week and the attitude of the judge was the same, as were the results. I had been before this judge 3 times previously on my own but this time I had a witness and a court reporter. The dude went ballistic and immediately called for two sheriffs deputies ( I reminded him that he had previously told me that this was a public courtroom and anyone could attend as long as they weren't disruptive). In his little private Idaho no one could record or take notes other than his accomplices and my reporter went bye bye. This all occured before he even had his robe on and we did the stand up sit down routine. Needless to say the hearing went downhill after that. Everything that I had written or said was disregarded and my motion was denied.

All marriages are common law marriages until we foolishly buy the license which renders it statutory. And although common law divorce doesn't exist (yet) there has to be a common law remedy. Have you ever noticed that in a criminal proceeding the courts will bend over backwards to protect the rights of the accused whereas in a civil proceeding they will do just the opposite. Preservation of the system is adhered to at all costs. In most cases the biggest impediment to reform are the reformers themselves, for they are trying to repair a system that shouldn't be fixed, but abolished.

So wargames, do you have any links to those cites you mentioned?

gldskr

[idknow]

Originally Posted by gldskr

Perhaps the next time you are bored and need a receptacle for your one liners, you could find a suitable thread, as this one is now 720 degrees and perpedicular to its original intent. Just a thought.


wargames

The mandate of the system is for everyone to succumb and apparently your marriage license and BC revocation docs were unsuccessful. Any insight as to why, other than the obvious corruption?

I also had a "Motion to Dismiss" hearing this past week and the attitude of the judge was the same, as were the results. I had been before this judge 3 times previously on my own but this time I had a witness and a court reporter. The dude went ballistic and immediately called for two sheriffs deputies ( I reminded him that he had previously told me that this was a public courtroom and anyone could attend as long as they weren't disruptive). In his little private Idaho no one could record or take notes other than his accomplices and my reporter went bye bye. This all occured before he even had his robe on and we did the stand up sit down routine. Needless to say the hearing went downhill after that. Everything that I had written or said was disregarded and my motion was denied.

All marriages are common law marriages until we foolishly buy the license which renders it statutory. And although common law divorce doesn't exist (yet) there has to be a common law remedy. Have you ever noticed that in a criminal proceeding the courts will bend over backwards to protect the rights of the accused whereas in a civil proceeding they will do just the opposite. Preservation of the system is adhered to at all costs. In most cases the biggest impediment to reform are the reformers themselves, for they are trying to repair a system that shouldn't be fixed, but abolished.

So wargames, do you have any links to those cites you mentioned?

gldskr

admin, move this to somewhere appropriate as per gldskr?

thanks.