Health - Esoterically

[Sharing Lights]

Originally Posted by HenryBowman

The publik skul system werks, do it?

Funny how birds of the same feather flock together.

I think we can safely coin a new term:

"Intellectual Illiterates."


Fudgepackers do not reproduce; Thus, they are inefficient at best, and useless at worst.


Just my literate opinion.

As you do what you do, I would reply by what it deserves.
You asked for it.

HenryBowman:The publik skul system werks, do it?

You are so honest, as usually, as that is how I write.

HenryBowman: Just my literate opinion.

Your literate opinion?

You have opinions besides?...

HenryBowman
Come and Get Some!
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North-Carolina
Posts: 2,195



I cannot answer that, as I was not there. I could answer what I believe, but that is not the question you directed to me.

I believe based on you conduct that you are driven not by what true religion or spirituality represents, as it can't represent what you project;

you are driven by your lower nature only do defend your ego and its fallacies.

That comes first to you.

You drive people away from spirituality and do it so well.
The best help to God you could offer is not to mention his/her name at all.
Just present your versions of spirituality, as your own, without hiding behind his/her back.
That's all.


Then you still express your opinion and do not drive those who search away.
It is big help already.




In the process that you use now, if you could, you would have utilized the Inquisition methods vs. those who dare to oppose your hypocrisy, while you are covering it with Psalms.

Proof:

Quote:
SL: 32) Would I go to hell for disagreeing with you?


Quote:
HenryBowman: If I were YHVH, yes you would.

I can imagine the world, in which you were God or YHVH...
Any one disagreeing with you, would have been sentenced by you to hell.
Is it not cute, is it not what the Inquisition tried so hard?
You may applaud yourself if like.
I, have, already, applauded you.


Since you can't accomplish that, you suffer and look for any opportunity not to enlighten this Forum with something positive but you look to say something nasty, still claiming to "represent" God and hunt Satan.


I cannot even take you on any intelligent debate as you plead the Fifth any time a firing of neurons is required.
It is not that easy for you to get beyond copy/paste or nasty/ hunting with all of your literacy.

The more you throw mud at me, the more you would be coved with it yourself, as my mind is in motion.

No mud can stick to moving objects.
Enjoy.

Originally Posted by Sharing Lights

As you what you do, I would reply by what it deserves.

I have absolutely no idea what this phrase you are posing as a sentence means.

Originally Posted by Sharing Lights

I believe based on you conduct that you are driven not what true religion or spirituality represents, as it can't represent what you project;

Here's another one. If you are trying to state that I am not controlled by religion or spirituality, you are most correct.

It is big help already.

I believe it would be big help for you to enroll in some some English composition classes, but that's my opinion.

Originally Posted by Sharing Lights

I can imagine the world, in which you were God or YHVH...
Any one disagreeing with you, would have been sentenced by you to hell.

It isn't pretty, is it?

I cannot even take you on any intelligent debate as you plead the Fifth any time a firing of neurons is required.

What about the "hiring" of neutrons?

[Sharing Lights]

[HenryBowman]I have absolutely no idea what this phrase you are posing as a sentence means.

As you consistently prove that you truly have no ideas and can't, even, understand basic sentences as above, there can be no reasonable conversation with some one who is that incompetent in my opinion.


Originally Posted by Sharing Lights
I believe based on you conduct that you are driven (by) not what true religion or spirituality represents, as it can't represent what you project;

HenryBowman: Here's another one. If you are trying to state that I am not controlled by religion or spirituality, you are most correct.

No, you are wrong again - I mean what you proved, which is you do not represent anything of positive that religion brings.

Here is the accurate logic:

Spirituality does not use lies, deceit, cheap shots.
You do.
Therefore, you have nothing to so with spirituality.
If any doubts, all can re-read your posts to me.

You cling to letters - not spirit and you proved it by making fun of minor spelling errors as I sleep little and have so many things to take care of.

1) So what, say, I omitted or added an apostrophe or missed "by" or "at."

The spirit of my writings is still intact and well understood.

As you are unable to debate intelligently, you debate unintelligently and laugh at the 1).

Keep on laughing, then, I am OK with that.



It doesn't matter what I write or what address, you, just, cant' reply intelligently.


When that is established, my common sense tell me that I have to stop responding to such individual, as that is a waste of time.

I addressed enough of what you and likes of you represent.

Beyond that, I have to stop.

I believe any reasonable person would agree with me.
Most may say that I should have stopped long time ago.

Yet, I had to reveal some things, as well as much was revealed by you, yourself.

If you respond to my reply here, you would only prove your manipulations and deceit on the level, which I call "cheap."

Since you replied to a simple phrase

HenryBowman: I have absolutely no idea what this phrase you are posing as a sentence means.

and the above phrases are not any more complicated,
logic dictates that you would respond again

HenryBowman: I have absolutely no idea what this phrase you are posing as a sentence means.

If you respond as if you understood me, that means, you have selective comprehension as some folks have selective memory concerning whatever is convenient or not to them.

I, also, have a proof of your cheap deceit on comprehension by the virtue of you replying to me all that time.

How could you respond if you could not understand my English?


You lie so much that became entangled in your, own lies, and discredited yourself before so many people in this Forum.
Look for answers to that within.





I know reasonable people understood me very well.

Other people... you know the answer.
To me, you redefined the word "vanity."

If you do not understand my English as you claim now, I can assure you that you do not understand much more than that...

By the way, when choose cheap shots, try to use, at least, a hint of logic, as the other people have read me and understood me quite well.

If you are right, then, all of them are wrong.
Yet, they are not wrong.

As much as that may upset you, I believe more people would be reading what I post and the numbers would grow.

I hope you do not have to resort to taking antidepressants due to that.

If you disagree with me, then, just look at the hits next to my posts.

The reason that I replied to you, as you can see is the idea that whatever one goes through, others may go through the same.

By my example, I show others when they are attacked by not intelligent debate but by lies, deceit, and cheap shoots, they should remain calm and confident that all can see what's truly going on.


If they choose to respond, all they have to do, as I did, copy the "wise comments" of the accuser, reply, and pose questions.

The accuser would reveal his/her nature shortly.

You did superb job indeed.

I, honestly, replied with a smile, while you replied with spite.



There was a music band called Styx.
It had a song "Too much time on my hands."


If you reply, that means you do understand me and my English.

Then, you admit that lied to all in the precious post.

I assure you , my logic and English didn't get any better.


Ask yourself, if like,
what have you lost and won by your cheap shots?

Was it worth it?

Did you benefit any one by that?

Did you become a better person in the process?

Were you posts positive or negative in nature?

Originally Posted by Sharing Lights

If you reply, that means you do understand me and my English.

I do not understand, nor shall I.


Your fantasy may include me having some understanding, but your fantasy is not my reality.

[Sharing Lights]

HenryBowman: I do not understand, nor shall I.

To all who read the posts:

Henry Bowman proved his lies again, as was given a fair opportunity to act fairly.
He chose to lie and use deceit again.

Proof?

If care, count, (even,) appoximately:

1) how many times he replied to me.

2) How many phrases he wrote and copied by size?

3) How much time he spent writing to me and replying.

Then, please, look at his quote, as I quote others accurately,

HenryBowman:I do not understand, nor shall I.

The person claims that he doesn't understand; yet,
compare that with 1-3.

That can mean either:

a) he lied here.

b) he spent that much time and made so many efforts while admitted the quoted below

HenryBowman:I do not understand, nor shall I.

What an exercise in futility and vanity then, indeed.


Do you remember when I wrote from the beginning
that never panic when some people get mean
toward you and use lies and deceit?

Didn't I predict that they would reveal themselves
and would entangle themselves in their,
own lies and fallacies?

So, maybe I knew something when wrote, meet the accusers with a smile, quote them, reply by logic but do not become them.

They would do themselves in.

Give them that opportunity if choose not to look away when they use cheap shoots.

Or just ignore them.

Either way, they deduct nothing from you but only from themselves.

I, also, have to make this disclaimer.

You would meet often the people who hypocritically preach about the Father and the Son,
Bible, and Morals, Virtues, and quote Psalms.


Please realize, as they do not represent the noble
aspect of Religion and, most of all, of true Spirituality,
the latter has nothing to do with them.

Do not neglect the value Spirituality proves.

It is beautiful beyond being beautiful.

You do not abandon eating forever just because a fly or two dropped in your food.

You may change a bowl, but do nourish yourself.


My experience has been that

the more some folks
quote Psalms and the louder they scream
of God and the Son, the more remote they are
from the latter in reality.

There are other people who, rarely, mention God's name at all.

They simply act fairly and honestly every day.

The least of all, they manipulate you or truth.

I have confidence all could discern on there own.
I really do believe.

This case has been illustrated well enough
to see what
works and what doesn't.

HenryBowman: Your fantasy may include me having some understanding, but your fantasy is not my reality.

I assure you that you are not anywhere in my fantasy.

I assure you that I found it useless, indeed, to expect you

having some understanding

Sorry, you and reality match as much as judges and real law
are compatible or hypocrisy and spirituality, in my opinion.



PS.


As above as below has been said before.

I could not help but noticed amazing similarity in the picture above and below
chosen by the person.

It looks that the smile is very similar in spirit.


http://suijuris.net/forum/avatars/he...ine=1149881031

[Sharing Lights]

Most of commercial food for pets is of cheap quality - basically of waste products of real food.
I believe our pets, being our devoted friends and dependent on us, deserve better.


I suggest a simple solution:


As some corporations put certain additives in their
"crap" and animals are drawn to such since have acute sense of smell, it may be not easy to put them on home made diet or on real meat and fish, let's say, particularly in the case of many cats.

When, my cat began showing sign of allergies,
I realized that the commercial food was catching up
with him over the years.

As the cat, refused to eat real boiled fish:
of high quality and nutritious value,
I began "fooling" the cat.

I gradually was adding to his, usual food about
10% to 75% of boiled fish in stages.

Now, he demands that combo as there is no tomorrow.

I could not re-teach, him, comletely, to forget
his regular commercial food, but 75% to 25% ratio in
favor of real food is not that bad.

Anyway, that is way better than 100% of
corporate leftovers of a hint of food.

Amazingly, the same corporations charge us
so much money as if they give quality food
and not by-products mostly.