Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jerseee
HB,
Courtesy of gregtu:
"Land Patents are issues (and theoretically passed) between Sovereigns. Deeds
are executed by 'persons' and private corporations without these sovereign powers." -- Leading Fighter vs. County of Gregory, 230 N.W.2d. 114.116 (1975)
|
This is where I am having trouble mentally connecting the dots.
How can one assert the right as an assign to claim a land patent, when the assign status comes from a Deed?
But in the Summa Corp Case, I take it that Summa Corp asserted their rights in the land patent under the 1851 treaty, and as such, the sovereign that the land was granted to became the sovereign in the case?
In other words, I am sovereign, but I am relying on the sovereign that had the original land patent to assert my rights, since the Deed is not to a living soul?
