Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > Land Ownership
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 08-09-2007, 08:35 PM
David Merrill's Avatar
David Merrill David Merrill is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 5,880
here's the law...

"...the United States, ... within their respective districts, as well as upon the high seas; (a) saving to suitors, in all cases, the right of a common law remedy, where the common law is competent to give it; and shall also have exclusive original cognizance of all seizures on land,..." The First Judiciary Act; September 24, 1789; Chapter 20, page 77. The Constitution of the United States of America, Revised and Annotated - Analysis and Interpretation - 1982; Article III, §2, Cl. 1 Diversity of Citizenship, U.S. Government Printing Office document 99-16, p. 741.

And clearly Goffer's ideas about common law are the post-1938 blending of law and equity. So that in itself defines it as incompetent, even if people consent to that jurisdiction every day.

But I have to admit, things are perked up around here. Thanks for your writings Goffer. It took me a bit to come around.


Regards,

David Merrill.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoonra
It is worth noting that the fealty to the Pope, which you cited for its explicit mention of the Templar abbey in Dover, is the legal basis for the invalidation of the Magna Carta after it was sealed at Runnymede.
During discussion about the Treaty of 1213 and the Magna Charta (1215).

http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/medieval/magframe.htm
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/john1a.html
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-13-2007, 09:45 AM
David Merrill's Avatar
David Merrill David Merrill is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 5,880
wannabee attorney

Quote:
No, I don't follow the common law of england. If you are talking about common law in the US of A, sure, it's called case law too.

The only time I have heard this admission was in the same breath as "Who told you about Erie?" - From a second year law student.

Therefore I gather that Goffertrap simply leaves us to infer he is an attorney. He is not.


Regards,

David Merrill.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoonra
It is worth noting that the fealty to the Pope, which you cited for its explicit mention of the Templar abbey in Dover, is the legal basis for the invalidation of the Magna Carta after it was sealed at Runnymede.
During discussion about the Treaty of 1213 and the Magna Charta (1215).

http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/medieval/magframe.htm
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/john1a.html
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-13-2007, 02:49 PM
palani's Avatar
palani palani is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 858
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dominion_666
There is no common law of the US. That was what Erie was about.

There is no link back to Christian Law. It is our domain of 666.

Now you better go back and figure out just what the U.S. is and, perhaps more to the point, what it is not.

Quote:
domain c.1425, in Scottish dialect, from M.Fr. domaine, from O.Fr. demaine "lord's estate"
__________________
Its' a dog eat dog world and I am wearing milkbone underwear!!!
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-13-2007, 03:45 PM
David Merrill's Avatar
David Merrill David Merrill is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 5,880
Quote:
Originally Posted by palani
Now you better go back and figure out just what the U.S. is and, perhaps more to the point, what it is not.

The Fundamental Orders (1639) are clearly in reference to Jesus. I kid you not; I photographed the whole thing if this is worth uploading for everybody. Otherwise, the text in its edited form is availiable from Yale's Avalon Project.


Regards,

David Merrill.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg CIMG0014_DCE.JPG (557.9 KB, 14 views)
File Type: jpg CIMG0015_DCE.JPG (556.1 KB, 10 views)
File Type: jpg CIMG0019_DCE.JPG (521.3 KB, 10 views)
File Type: jpg CIMG0020_DCE.JPG (659.1 KB, 11 views)
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoonra
It is worth noting that the fealty to the Pope, which you cited for its explicit mention of the Templar abbey in Dover, is the legal basis for the invalidation of the Magna Carta after it was sealed at Runnymede.
During discussion about the Treaty of 1213 and the Magna Charta (1215).

http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/medieval/magframe.htm
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/john1a.html
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-13-2007, 05:41 PM
RickA's Avatar
RickA RickA is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 491
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dominion_666
There is no common law of the US. That was what Erie was about.
Would you please show me where/how there is no common law in the United states of America?

Quote:
There is no link back to Christian Law.

Yes there is!

Quote:
It is our domain of 666.
Ours? Hardly. You see, you and others who follow suit are mere monkeys, not in the simple, disparaging, manner, but in the manner of a monkey being on the shoulder of the man with a musical box turning the handle. What is the monkey doing while the man is turning the handle.....the monkey is dancing to the music.

Now dance monkey!
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-13-2007, 06:01 PM
RickA's Avatar
RickA RickA is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 491
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dominion_666
No. I do nothing kindly upon request.

Quote:
You are are a mere monkey's ass. I never once spoke of America.
Well then, where would this US you mentioned a few posts back be?

Quote:
You will be joined. you will relish in the dominion of the 666 while the those in the dominion of the 777 will laugh at you.
Do you even know what 666 is?

Quote:
Now dance monkey-man. For while a monkey will obliterate you will joinder forever.
I'm not the one sitting on the shoulder of the man turning the handle.

Say..........am I familiar with your posts? From around here or..........another site?

I can't quite put my finger on it.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 08-13-2007, 06:10 PM
truthmatrix truthmatrix is offline
Waking Up
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 28
Calif. Civil Code 22.2,
"The Common Law of England, so far as it is not repugnant to or inconsistent with the Constitution of the united States, or the Constitution or the laws of this state, is the rule of decision in all the courts of this state."

TM
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 08-13-2007, 06:34 PM
gldskr's Avatar
gldskr gldskr is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Arizona state
Posts: 419
Quote:
Originally Posted by Codee
The US I speak of is a limited power government doing Business As the Government. And within our domain there is no common law as was laid down clear as day in Erie.

Unfortunately Codee is correct. The "government" as we know it is merely a foreign owned corporate enterprise enforcing the terms of its corporate charter. Enter the corporate domain and you are thereby bound.

Our original jurisdiction government still exists, unfortunately all the seats are vacant. No need to blame our elected "servants", the fault lies with the man in the mirror.

Clever persona Codee, I'm still waiting for Ahnold though, that might be a tuffy.

gldskr
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 08-13-2007, 06:35 PM
RickA's Avatar
RickA RickA is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 491
Quote:
Well then, where would this US you mentioned a few posts back be?


Quote:
In the reservation for the dominion's residency. In the District. the dominion however is are the corners, think globally.

I see.

Quote:
Do you even know what 666 is?


Quote:
667-1?

See, right there, just when I thought we were getting somewhere, a cordial converstaion, you roll with that.
Geez!


Quote:
I'm not the one sitting on the shoulder of the man turning the handle.


Quote:
Or so you say you are not. Although if you were you would not know it. I love how every proclaimed Christian thinks they are saved. You are not.

Two things with this one. Well, actually several.
Firstly, I do not recall saying anything about me being a Christian. Do you?
Secondly, just what is a Christian?
Thirdly, What is to be saved?
Fourthly, sort of like a frog being boiled slowly?

Quote:
Say..........am I familiar with your posts? From around here or..........another site?


Quote:
Outlaws Legal. Many contracts to sign there. now all done. They ran out of, they, ran out of there "quid".

So, they ran out of money?

Quote:
I can't quite put my finger on it.


Quote:
That is ok. No one is interested in your finger. I am familiar because you are domiciled in the dominion of which I am ambassador.

Have you spoken?
Your name is Jeremy isn't it?


Quote:
go ahead and grind. The monkey is in the better position then the man in his dominion of 666. Redeem quick, your time is up for discounted goods.
I thought I made it clear that I was not calling you a monkey to be calling you names. I wasn't. What I was doing was taking your play on being in the, as you have stated several times now, dominion of 666 and questioning whether you understood just what that entailed. I ask, do you know just what that entails?

I'm neither the monkey nor the man.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 08-13-2007, 06:38 PM
RickA's Avatar
RickA RickA is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 491
Quote:
Originally Posted by gldskr
Unfortunately Codee is correct. The "government" as we know it is merely a foreign owned corporate enterprise enforcing the terms of its corporate charter. Enter the corporate domain and you are thereby bound.

Our original jurisdiction government still exists, unfortunately all the seats are vacant. No need to blame our elected "servants", the fault lies with the man in the mirror.

Clever persona Codee, I'm still waiting for Ahnold though, that might be a tuffy.

gldskr
I was just casting out in the old fishing hole.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Common Law Courts psholtz Court 26 02-15-2007 09:56 AM
The law that is common & the root of the common law aksis Living & Survival 42 02-02-2007 12:14 PM
Common Law Contract free_martha Court 0 03-16-2006 07:01 PM
Common law judgment kgod999 Court 18 12-13-2005 08:03 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:13 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2007 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer