Quote:
|
Originally Posted by andrewmitch
If "common law" has been replaced with "public policy" than it's either time to start opening fire or get out of the country.
|
1938 I beleive ERIE RAILROAD CO. vs. THOMPKINS, 304 U.S. 64, 82 L. Ed. 1188) was the demise of the common law, and the courts only dredge it up when it is to theri benefit. That said there is still a few avenues that have been missed that the posers who take peoples funds dont even approach in the quest for Allodial title or a land patent.
1. search back in abstract for the original patent holder, seek out the heirs of that person and have them ASSIGN you to the patent, sounds far fetched but it brings the origianl patent back into force and effect as most folks now days get a "title insurance" claiming no liens but does not show chain of ownership or abstract, and they have "quiet enjoyment" of title [in laymans terms they do not own the property or any portion of the patent and the original assignee can re-claim the land if they so desire to a degree.... not tested in court that i know of yet]
2. As long as there is a mortgage the note holder usually holds a lien on the property and the "assignor" has given up rights to hold if they cannot "re-pay" the mortgage, ergo they no longer hold the chain of title in proper form, and as such the holder of the mortgage could enforce a payment of taxes clause be placed in the contract, as they are supplying the corporate funds which generally are obligations of the the united states, so unless gold coin is exchanged you have debt attached to the repayment of the mortgage that the new mortgage replaces and as such taxes follow...... only supposition but the court is gonna do a person under any way they can.
3. Jural Society, the non-statutory abatement process can only be accomplished with the establishment of such a group, then that group can if large enough keep the defacto administration at bay, the problem with a Jural society is that not many people can function outside of the way society has raised us up.... try living in the way described within Deuteronomy...... watch television and see something profane and you blew it, you did not "live" as scripture would have you, therefore the court would do you under and the Jural society would fall apart..... but there is precedent for Jural society and non-statutory abatement and it can be accomplished.... so possibility for folks to do it on their own exists and also in groups.... I have no information, though a few acquaintances keep prodding me along to learn more.
4. only 2 things in life are certain.... taxes and death, even if you beat the first one for the most part, the second will eventually get you! and then the taxes after death become hard ship on your heirs who dont take your perseverance and hard work the same as you and let it go back to the way it was and the next generations have to go through it all again....
Stay focused, start at square one, do not let the court or the governmental bodies nor the people sway you off the path, if they do , you return to square one and start over, sometimes your path gets easier as you dont make the same mistakes three times [some folks learn harder than others and have the motto "We do it right cause we do it twice"] Set goals of EXACTLY what you want to achieve, dont take the word of anyone selling any information on land patents or Allodial title, what do they have to lose if you follow their advice and you lose your fight? they already have your funds and you are back to square one..... and contrary to that statement is it is alright to purchase their material if you throughly research it and not just try to apply it, there is no "silver bullet" or easy fix.
In reading this thread, I was intrigued with several directions that it tried to take off on, including that the Queen still holds title to the several nation states, perhaps in treaty, perhaps through the IMF, and if that is the case, those are merely institutions created by man and not by Almighty God the creator, and they can only "claim" what they can hold through force..... so if true then we al lose cause who would go against the Queen or the City of London? [not to be confused with London the town/city]
more as needed or as it comes to me.
William
Central Idaho
