Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > Land Ownership
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-27-2007, 10:41 AM
andrewmitch andrewmitch is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 239
ok then based on what you are saying we need to

1) Unrecord our property

2) Establish a common-law way to claim the property by securing proper title

3) Cancel our voter registration


Have you done all this (successfully)?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-27-2007, 11:40 AM
mrg's Avatar
mrg mrg is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois Republic
Posts: 3,238
Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewmitch
I think what ghost was trying to say is that we enter into the contract voluntarily (caveat emptor if you will).....and that the force occurs only if you don't uphold your end of the contract.



Which contract, the mortgage or the registration?

I think my posts are off target though, so apologies Ghost.

What instrument actually was the source for any monetization?

Last edited by mrg : 09-27-2007 at 11:44 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-27-2007, 11:44 AM
andrewmitch andrewmitch is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 239
well, i was meaning the Registration (I am not sure how the banks enforce their contract but it is probably with the same LEO's and w/ force).
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-27-2007, 12:20 PM
andrewmitch andrewmitch is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 239
by the way, the tax assignment in the deed is easy to remove - just sell it to a family member or legal entity and then when you buy it back you remove the tax clause from the deed

the issue though is that because of state statute, the prop tax gets attached to the house
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-27-2007, 06:28 PM
gldskr's Avatar
gldskr gldskr is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Arizona state
Posts: 433
andrewmitch

You are missing the point, that being, there is a statutory land/real estate transaction and a non statutory land/real estate transaction. Allodial title can only be achieved in a non statutory transaction. Statutes are for persons, entities or fictions. Are you such or have you contracted to be so?

As I have previously stated, buying property is no different than buying oranges at your local grocer. An offer is made, the offer is accepted, consideration is given, the property is transfered and the deal is done.

The key is to remove the interlopers and their subsequent contracts from the transaction. Realtors and banks will require that you follow statutory guidelines. Avoid these entities.

There is no de jure government, but the de jure law still exists for those who are predisposed to use it. Take advantage of this and structure your transaction within the law and not the statute.

The Supremes have stated numerous times that the land patent is superior title. Wouldn't this be the foundation of any transfer document(s)? Doesn't the deed evidence those contracts entered into subsequent to?

There are two realms which you can operate. Only one can be successful, choose wisely.

gldskr
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-27-2007, 06:44 PM
rottweiler's Avatar
rottweiler rottweiler is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: judicial district of tens: Milwaukee the county: Wisconsin the land
Posts: 2,572
The de jure government still exists. Hardly anyone uses it. Other than that, good post IMO.


Quote:
Originally Posted by gldskr
There is no de jure government, but the de jure law still exists for those who are predisposed to use it. gldskr
__________________
United States never held any municipal sovereignty, jurisdiction, or right of soil in Alabama or any of the new states which were formed ... The United States has no Constitutional capacity to exercise municipal jurisdiction, sovereignty or eminent domain, within the limits of a state or elsewhere, except in the cases in which it is expressly granted ...
[Pollard v. Hagan, 44 U.S.C. 213, 221, 223]
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-27-2007, 06:58 PM
gldskr's Avatar
gldskr gldskr is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Arizona state
Posts: 433
Thank you rottweiler and I stand corrected.

Quote:
The de jure government still exists.

Unfortunately all the seats are vacant.

gldskr
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-27-2007, 08:29 PM
rottweiler's Avatar
rottweiler rottweiler is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: judicial district of tens: Milwaukee the county: Wisconsin the land
Posts: 2,572
They are not vacant they are just filled by de facto officers. There is such a thing as a de facto officer you know but there is no such thing as a de facto office.

For example, in my judicial district in Milwaukee the county there is a office called the magistrate created under the authority of the Office of the People. However this magistrate without authority of the Office of the People also poses as the COUNTY SUPERVISOR of the 8th DISTRICT of MILWAUKEE COUNTY. Any act by the latter is no act at all without authority.

You can go all the way up the line and you will see the overlay of a foreign corporate usurper cloaked over all the de jure offices. The de facto officers are still there and they do hold their offices under the authority of the Office of the People. They just hardly ever have to do anything for them and really don't want to anyway.

It would be really simple to take the country back if we just got started. There are enough so-called patriots, they just need to be educated.


Quote:
Originally Posted by gldskr
Thank you rottweiler and I stand corrected.



Unfortunately all the seats are vacant.

gldskr
__________________
United States never held any municipal sovereignty, jurisdiction, or right of soil in Alabama or any of the new states which were formed ... The United States has no Constitutional capacity to exercise municipal jurisdiction, sovereignty or eminent domain, within the limits of a state or elsewhere, except in the cases in which it is expressly granted ...
[Pollard v. Hagan, 44 U.S.C. 213, 221, 223]

Last edited by rottweiler : 09-27-2007 at 08:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-28-2007, 03:57 AM
andrewmitch andrewmitch is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 239
ok...so what am I hearng then?

I think that the first step is to get the Land Patent and then to re-sell it to yourself only this time use the common law procedure and not the statutory process?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-28-2007, 05:12 AM
rottweiler's Avatar
rottweiler rottweiler is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: judicial district of tens: Milwaukee the county: Wisconsin the land
Posts: 2,572
The first step is to "pay off" the mortgage. In the meantime why don't you do a abstract on it? Check all the tranfers of title all the way back to when it was patented. You are checking for a clear chain of title by making sure there where no tax sales and such so make copies of everything so you can get copies of the patent from the BLM.

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewmitch
ok...so what am I hearng then?

I think that the first step is to get the Land Patent and then to re-sell it to yourself only this time use the common law procedure and not the statutory process?
__________________
United States never held any municipal sovereignty, jurisdiction, or right of soil in Alabama or any of the new states which were formed ... The United States has no Constitutional capacity to exercise municipal jurisdiction, sovereignty or eminent domain, within the limits of a state or elsewhere, except in the cases in which it is expressly granted ...
[Pollard v. Hagan, 44 U.S.C. 213, 221, 223]

Last edited by rottweiler : 09-28-2007 at 05:18 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Desparate Help on Quit Claims & Land Patents denise4554 Land Ownership 12 09-29-2007 10:22 PM
Will land patents stop eminent domain? wirlwind Land Ownership 2 06-24-2005 11:38 PM
BOE and Land Patents faithchris UCC 6 01-24-2005 04:35 PM
Land Patents gregtu Land Ownership 41 12-15-2004 07:49 PM
Land Patents-Again wirlwind Land Ownership 17 04-16-2004 02:22 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:21 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2007 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer