Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ranchwife
Notorial Dissent:
Sorry. Guess I didnt get it. Like I said, Im just a beginner trying to find the way.
Mr. Merrill:
I thank you for the time and understanding in your reply. I have always been what Alan Nation calls a "Sheeple", but my hubby has taken the last 7 years trying to undo that. Problem is, its mostly stuff he has heard, and I get to do the research! I have come across a couple websites peoples-rights.com and libertyForLife.com. Got any recommendations?
Thanks again for your time. It is truly appreciated!
Ann
|
Source material.
The remedy to pledging yourself and your possessions chattel was written into the 1913 Fed Act. It is in full force and effect today but without reference to lawful money being directly attached to gold and silver. First read §16 of the Act and understand that the charters for the Fed banks expired in 1933 (20 years). FDR made it illegal to turn in your elastic FRNs for lawful money - that is inelastic gold based currency - US notes or better yet the gold; The Bankers' Holiday they called it.
http://Friends-n-Family-Research.inf...ot_dollars.jpg
And so Title 12 U.S.C. §411 was amended to only include US notes - as defined by Congress. FRNs are only redeemable in lawful money because your endorsement bonds the expansion of the money supply by fractional lending. That extra money created "out of thin air" as a lot of patriots consider it, is actually backed by a first lien by the Treasury on anything you "buy" with private credit from the Fed.
Elastic currency. Think about it - elastic currency with no bond would be counterfeiting by government. The people and their property became the bond when the US government convinced people through our own conditioning that we no longer have remedy.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ht...1----000-.html
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ht...000-notes.html
There it is though - still in full force and effect. You can still redeem those stock certificates in the Fed - FRNs in lawful money - US notes but since 1971 they look just like FRNs. However, the paycheck you cashed for them was not endorsing private credit;
non-endorsement. The bank calls it
restricted endorsement sometimes but usually will not give you any troubles.
However between a number of 'suitors' and on the Internet, I have gathered quite a few anecdotes of the banks, particularly US Bank going through various gyrations to convince people this is not what the law plainly means. And of course Shoonra, a retired law librarian with current subscriptions to all the cool information suppliers has constantly tried to tone down the fact that FRNs
are not lawful money, as
they shall be redeemed in lawful money on demand...
Good thing people who think can figure that out.
Simply put. If you purchase a shirt with private credit from the Fed the Treasury holds a first lien position on that shirt because you never paid it off. If you lose an administrative dispute with the IRS the Fed will place notice
Notice of Federal Tax Lien on the shirt to let all interested parties know if you try selling it, there is a first lien on it by the Treasury. (see attachment)
But if you walk out of the bank having redeemed lawful money, then whatever you purchase is lien free - allodium. It is really that simple. I suggest you might use the simpler:
Quote:
Redeemed in lawful money pursuant to Title 12 U.S.C. §411
True Name dba First M. Last
|
but the verbiage in my video works very well over the counter with most bank tellers.
http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/convincing.html
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...06869308133588
Open the text file and read it along while the video plays the 1984 Freedom League article on the computer voice.
Regards,
David Merrill.
Linear Mode
