Allodial TiTle and Land Patents, Ownerships Highest proof^i^ - Page 2

Big Al · #11 08-11-2006, 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LawProfessor777

Dear fellow Sovereigns,
I need to secure the property's of my Parent's.
One is getting very sick and the other one is so caught up in the legal system.
I cant tear them out without ripping their heart's out too?
Any Suggestions how to secure property Via a Land Patent, versus a UCC One Lein?
Any suggestions, feel free to contact me directly.
PS I am A Law Professor for the Common Law Only

God Bless to you all

You need good Trust advice, and do it as soon as possible.

bman · #12 12-08-2006, 05:58 PM

I found this free download at this address, http://www.freedom-school.com/land_p...dial_title.pdf
this is very interesting info

SansRecours · #13 12-08-2006, 10:14 PM

Article 2 Section 28 1874 Const. for Arkansas

"SECTION 28. Tenure of lands.
All lands in this State are declared to be allodial; and feudal tenures of every description, with all their incidents, are prohibited."

SansRecours

codecracker · #14 01-04-2007, 04:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bman

I found this free download at this address, http://www.freedom-school.com/land_p...dial_title.pdf
this is very interesting info

I've been to two counties with this Torrens Act information in 2005 and was told both times that very few properties in Washington were actually registered under that act, therefor, no way to remove property from that registration scheme.

CC

alcar7 · #15 05-26-2007, 07:06 AM

would the damages be the purchase price of the property?
alcar7@yahoo.com

lordsofillusion · #16 11-11-2007, 02:09 PM

What do***ents are rquired and where do I obtain them, to prove/protect my mother's life estate interest in Texas real estate as set forth in my grandfather's Will?

He's second wife's Will has tried to deny my mother's interest and my cousins are now attempting to sell said interest.

Any information will be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

cashhunter · #17 04-14-2008, 03:03 PM

Your paper on Land Patents is very interesting ;however, you failed to realize that the Republic of Texas or now the illegal State of Texas never ceeded any land to the uSA except that part of the Republic of Texas that is now
the Oklahoma Panhandle, Half of New Mexico and Colorado and a small part of Montana.

There is no BLM in Texas and one must go to Austin to prove up on the original title which in many places were measured in leagues and varrahs.

Does anyone know just how to acquire the land patent in Texas?

Blessings,
Cash Hunter

Guesswhotoo6 · #18 04-26-2008, 03:59 PM

I called the BLM out in the midwest regarding this very question. Their response was interesting. These lands are settled issues by the King of England, we do not have anything to do with lands of the King. They do not even maintain records for the original 13 colonies.

Quote:

Originally Posted by idknow

start with the patents given by the King

Notorial dissent · #19 04-26-2008, 09:53 PM

All lands in the original thirteen colonies were issued under Letters Patent from either the English Crown, the Commonwealth, or the Dutch Crown. The originals for the most part were recorded in the state archives of the issuing country. The bearer copies were eventually recorded in whatever passed for the Recorder of Deeds, usually the courts in colonial times. Since there was no uniform land registration at the time it was not uncommon for two or more grants to contain chunks of another grant, and there were a great many lawsuits that resulted from grants that overlapped each other. The grants were in many cases issued, revoked, reissued, amended, or remade repeatedly, all of which has served to enrich generations of real estate lawyers. Once recorded, the holders proceeded to break them up into smaller and smaller parcels and sell them off or give them away in one fashion or another as deeded properties. After the Revolution, the thirteen former colonies passed their own property laws to define how property would be recorded, and for the most part they settled on the County Recorder of Deeds to hold and maintain the records. In theory, if you have time and patience enough and want to wade back through 300 years of property transfers, if you are very lucky you might reach the original deed that was issued off of one patent or another if they haven’t been burned, lost, and or destroyed.

David Merrill · #20 04-26-2008, 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Notorial dissent

All lands in the original thirteen colonies were issued under Letters Patent from either the English Crown, the Commonwealth, or the Dutch Crown. The originals for the most part were recorded in the state archives of the issuing country. The bearer copies were eventually recorded in whatever passed for the Recorder of Deeds, usually the courts in colonial times. Since there was no uniform land registration at the time it was not uncommon for two or more grants to contain chunks of another grant, and there were a great many lawsuits that resulted from grants that overlapped each other. The grants were in many cases issued, revoked, reissued, amended, or remade repeatedly, all of which has served to enrich generations of real estate lawyers. Once recorded, the holders proceeded to break them up into smaller and smaller parcels and sell them off or give them away in one fashion or another as deeded properties. After the Revolution, the thirteen former colonies passed their own property laws to define how property would be recorded, and for the most part they settled on the County Recorder of Deeds to hold and maintain the records. In theory, if you have time and patience enough and want to wade back through 300 years of property transfers, if you are very lucky you might reach the original deed that was issued off of one patent or another if they haven’t been burned, lost, and or destroyed.