Quote:
|
Originally Posted by truth
I have my own feeble views on this, but, other than the fact that it's a deed to begin with, what makes it fraudulent? By that I mean, what compells them to accept that it IS fraudulent?
Thanks,
truth
|
Say perhaps an obviously false signature, or perhaps an obvious false name as the sellers of the property. I suggest these possibilities as a result of having other documents signed by the same two people and there is no comparison between the varying signatures and or names that a prudent person would call genuine.
Also is the matter of the notary indicating under seal, that he personally knew the sellers. I know from talking to the same notary that he did not personally know the sellers.
jerry