05-09-2008, 09:10 PM
|
|
|
Old SAC Survival Intelligence Officer
I just read THE UCC CONNECTION
iI filed my UCC-1 in Nevada and timely filed a continuance; also filed in California (2nd home--rented-out).
Several weeks ago, I was teleconning with an old highschool buddy; then he died in surgery. He worked for IRS; I told him about my UCC-1. He said it wasn't legal anymore? then I got two IRS letters claiming I hadn't filed in 2003; which is a fact because I already had filed my original UCC_1 and UCC-3.
When I did file the last time, 2001? I got money back 'cause I'm retired in Nevada, and don't make much. Now IRS is claiming (from Austin) that I owe them taxes and penalties for 2003.
In my 1st response, I included a stamped copyof my UCC-1&3 ; plus my Common Law copyright of my ALL-CAPS NAME. They did not acknowledge receipt of that letter, but they signed for it? thanks for your excellent 19 page article. I have Cracking The Code 3rd Edition. I'm totally disabled--physically.
Thanks for your work and thanks for making it available.
DeWayne C. Davi: I just ordered your book , but you didn't take my Master Card #??? RSVP
|
05-10-2008, 12:41 PM
|
 |
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois Republic
Posts: 3,034
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by freebeme
So you created your name and no one else can use it?
Thaat is quite simply the stupidest notion of the day.
|
No, this is quite simply the stupidest notion of the day:
"freebeme" |
05-10-2008, 12:54 PM
|
 |
Unplugged
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sarasota,Florida
Posts: 96
|
|
|
in case you missed it
|
05-10-2008, 04:37 PM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois Republic
Posts: 3,034
|
|
 
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by freebeme
Maybe you should understand that the one primary purpose of a name it so that OTHERS may address you.
THERE ARE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS IN A NAME!
Just in case you missed it...
THERE ARE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS IN A NAME!
THERE ARE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS IN A NAME!
THERE ARE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS IN A NAME!
THERE ARE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS IN A NAME!
THERE ARE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS IN A NAME!
THERE ARE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS IN A NAME!
THERE ARE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS IN A NAME!
THERE ARE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS IN A NAME!
THERE ARE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS IN A NAME!
THERE ARE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS IN A NAME!
THERE ARE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS IN A NAME!
THERE ARE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS IN A NAME!
THERE ARE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS IN A NAME!
THERE ARE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS IN A NAME!
THERE ARE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS IN A NAME!
THERE ARE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS IN A NAME!
THERE ARE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS IN A NAME!
THERE ARE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS IN A NAME!
THERE ARE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS IN A NAME!
THERE ARE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS IN A NAME!
THERE ARE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS IN A NAME!
THERE ARE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS IN A NAME!
THERE ARE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS IN A NAME!
|
Do I detect a broad all-inclusive statement, forwarded as definitive indisputable absolute FACT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeme
"NO" "NO" "NO" "NO" "NO" "NO" "NO" "NO" "NO" "NO" "NO" "NO" "NO" "NO" "NO" "NO" "NO" "NO" "NO" "NO"
|
Trademark, Trade Name
Quote:
Quote:
A trademark is a type of intellectual property, and typically a name, word, phrase, logo, symbol, design, image, or a combination of these elements.
Restatement (Third) of Unfair Competition § 9 (1995)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeme
Maybe you should understand that the one primary purpose of a name it so that OTHERS may address you.
THERE ARE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS IN A NAME!
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
We recognized long ago that trademarks are a form of common-law property right.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 48 / 97-771
Filed March 24, 1999
COMMERCIAL SAVINGS BANK,
Appellant,
vs.
HAWKEYE FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK,
Defendant,
and
COMMERCIAL FEDERAL BANK
|
Quote:
Quote:
A trademark is a type of intellectual property, and typically a name, word, phrase, logo, symbol, design, image, or a combination of these elements.
Restatement (Third) of Unfair Competition § 9 (1995)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeme
Maybe you should understand that the one primary purpose of a name it so that OTHERS may address you.
THERE ARE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS IN A NAME!
|
|
|
INTRODUCING THE UNITED STATES RIGHT OF PUBLICITY
|
05-10-2008, 04:54 PM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,003
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by freebeme
You cannot copy right a name because THERE ARE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS IN A NAME!
|
FORD, HEWLETT PACKARD, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, FERRARI, SARA LEE, BETTY CROCKER, SWANSONS, DREYERS, etc. Need I go on?
__________________
Any fool can hire an attorney. It takes a touch of genius-and a lot of courage-to move in the opposite direction.
Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, following the tradition of men according to the rudiments of the world, and not in accordance with Christ.
I have more fun than peeeeple. -Bugs Bunny
To view other forums or create a new thread; While viewing any thread scroll down to the bottom right hand side. Select from Forum Jump.
Last edited by ezrhythm : 05-10-2008 at 04:59 PM.
|
05-10-2008, 04:58 PM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,003
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Steel
you CAN NOT kill what you DID NOT create
|
So then create it and own the rights to it!
__________________
Any fool can hire an attorney. It takes a touch of genius-and a lot of courage-to move in the opposite direction.
Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, following the tradition of men according to the rudiments of the world, and not in accordance with Christ.
I have more fun than peeeeple. -Bugs Bunny
To view other forums or create a new thread; While viewing any thread scroll down to the bottom right hand side. Select from Forum Jump.
|
05-11-2008, 03:29 AM
|
 |
Unplugged
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 102
|
|
|
Own It
It has to be understood FULLY. A personal name cannot be trademarked or be a trade name. To do so would create absurd results.
If my name was John Smith, and I claim ownership by trademarking my name as a tradename (which is what trademarking is) then that's like saying all the other John Smiths can no longer use their names.
No if I do something that "distinguishes" my name from every other "John Smith" NOW I've got a claim. You can trade mark your signature easy. But, not your ALL CAPS or First Initial Caps name. Unless you add something unique to it. Like Prince when he changed his.
__________________
Grammar & style are NOT strawman theories!!!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Soldier of Truth
There is no foundation or support for "persons" in the English language, or in the rules of grammar of the English language, any more than it is for one's name to be "correctly" and "properly" spelled IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
What on Earth are you referring to when you say "Rules of grammar?" I have no idea what argument you trying to make. I also therefore have no idea what you are referring to in my essay.
|
"To hold a pen is to be at war." Voltaire
|
05-11-2008, 03:42 AM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,003
|
|
|
Yes, you can trademark any name you desire. If the name is already trademarked then one may have to battle it out in court. (Or have the case dismissed. wink wink)
You may trademark your friends name too and when the corporate defacto State uses your friend's name unjustly, you have a right to tell them to Cease and Desist, file a claim, etc.
__________________
Any fool can hire an attorney. It takes a touch of genius-and a lot of courage-to move in the opposite direction.
Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, following the tradition of men according to the rudiments of the world, and not in accordance with Christ.
I have more fun than peeeeple. -Bugs Bunny
To view other forums or create a new thread; While viewing any thread scroll down to the bottom right hand side. Select from Forum Jump.
|
05-11-2008, 05:07 PM
|
|
Unplugged
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 102
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ezrhythm
Yes, you can trademark any name you desire. If the name is already trademarked then one may have to battle it out in court.
|
You would get NO traction, in court or anywhere else with that. A "personal name" WITHOUT distinguishing feature(s) CANNOT be trademarked. If that were fact, and my name was John Smith, and I trademarked it, EVERY John Smith would be in violation of using my name whenever they received monetary compensation.
That's nonsensical. A signature name yes, and as I've stated previously, if there is a "distinguishing" feature(s) about the name, then it could, otherwise, you'd never have any remedy in law, or at law, private, or public to enforce it.
__________________
Grammar & style are NOT strawman theories!!!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Soldier of Truth
There is no foundation or support for "persons" in the English language, or in the rules of grammar of the English language, any more than it is for one's name to be "correctly" and "properly" spelled IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
What on Earth are you referring to when you say "Rules of grammar?" I have no idea what argument you trying to make. I also therefore have no idea what you are referring to in my essay.
|
"To hold a pen is to be at war." Voltaire
Last edited by Soldier of Truth : 05-11-2008 at 05:10 PM.
|
05-12-2008, 05:23 AM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,003
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Soldier of Truth
You would get NO traction, in court or anywhere else with that. A "personal name" WITHOUT distinguishing feature(s) CANNOT be trademarked. If that were fact, and my name was John Smith, and I trademarked it, EVERY John Smith would be in violation of using my name whenever they received monetary compensation.
|
I understand what you mean by distiguishing features.
Trademarks are exaclty that, a "mark".
So the Ford Corporation would get no traction in court if one began to commercially use their name? And to make it like a personal name; Edsel Ford.
I disagree.
One would have to prove their claim but I see a case having potential.
No, every John Smith would not be in violation. That is not how it works. The John Smith with the trademark would first have to decide to file a claim and a court would have to rule before a violation could occur.
__________________
Any fool can hire an attorney. It takes a touch of genius-and a lot of courage-to move in the opposite direction.
Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, following the tradition of men according to the rudiments of the world, and not in accordance with Christ.
I have more fun than peeeeple. -Bugs Bunny
To view other forums or create a new thread; While viewing any thread scroll down to the bottom right hand side. Select from Forum Jump.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:12 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
|
|
