Quote:
|
Originally Posted by brozer5
|
I deduce that you edited the message because you were harsh in the first drafting - toward my lack of alarmism about RFIDs. I saw nothing about active to the point where these things can be functional on satellite or GPS systems. The video of course said that was the
next step. So we may find a jack in the skin that the wearer/host must charge up, maybe at night while sleeping. That is the extent of my point. Battery technology has not gotten advanced enough and satellites must by inherent design be low power consumption devices.
Consider the images I already posted again. Think about the size of cellphone batteries. Then you will understand where I am coming from.
The Attorney General of Mexico is putting some degree of pressure in that if you want certain high-security jobs with him you will be asked if it is okay to implant an RFID. If you opt out - well you don't get into the high-security areas and maybe there is no position for you with that firm. Myself, I wont be putting any of those in me. I will tell you that for free.
I ridiculed putting one in a dog here. That was silly. And a little sad considering now the dog is still wearing a tag so that you know to scan and that is to call an 800 # where all the information in the chip can just be told over the phone. They might as well have done the tag and info-line without hurting the dog and subjecting her to unknown longterm health problems.
Regards,
David Merrill.
