
05-17-2008, 04:03 PM
|
 |
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: California
Posts: 632
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by netwrkranger
From the videos that I posted today, Morocco was located in New York and is the reason it is called the 'Empire State'.
I am looking for coat of arms with Moorish influences or people on them.
|
I haven't seen that video (I've seen some that you've posted today, but perhaps not all), but is what you're saying that Morocco (the one in Africa) had "colonies" here in the New World, colonies that eventually were taken over by the Dutch, and then the British?
Or are you saying something different? Like that Morocco "started" here and then expanded eastward into Africa?
Last edited by psholtz : 05-17-2008 at 04:08 PM.
|

05-17-2008, 05:48 PM
|
 |
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 921
|
|
|
The video's claim is that the Moors were already here.
|

05-17-2008, 10:15 PM
|
 |
Unplugged
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 103
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by netwrkranger
From the videos that I posted today, Morocco was located in New York and is the reason it is called the 'Empire State'.
I am looking for coat of arms with Moorish influences or people on them.
|
I raised a similar query amongst some brothas that are more knowledgeable on this subject than I, and I was told those coats of arms are of the Moors. I cannot validate or invalidate this position. Just the response that I received. If you find out one way or the other please pass it on.
__________________
Grammar & style are NOT strawman theories!!!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Soldier of Truth
There is no foundation or support for "persons" in the English language, or in the rules of grammar of the English language, any more than it is for one's name to be "correctly" and "properly" spelled IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
What on Earth are you referring to when you say "Rules of grammar?" I have no idea what argument you trying to make. I also therefore have no idea what you are referring to in my essay.
|
"To hold a pen is to be at war." Voltaire
|

07-10-2008, 07:12 AM
|
 |
Unplugged
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mecca (ILLINOIS)
Posts: 106
|
|
|
Free White Persons: “Free White Persons” referred to in Naturalization Act, as amended by Act July 14, 1870, has meaning naturally given to it when first used in 1 Stat. 103, c 3, meaning all persons belonging to the European races then commonly counted as white, and their descendants, including such descendants in other countries to which they have emigrated.
Free White Persons includes all European Jews, more or less intermixed with peoples of Celtic, Scandinavian, Teutonic, Iberian, Latin, Greek, and Slavic descent. It includes Magyars, Lapps, and Finns, and the Basques and Albanians. It includes the mixed Latin, Celtic-Iberian, and Moorish inhabitants of Spain and Portugal, the mixed Greek, Latin, Phoenician, and North African inhabitants of Sicily, and the mixed Slav and Tarter inhabitants of South Russia. Free White People does not mean Caucasian race, Aryan race, or Indo-European races, nor the mixed Indo-European, Dravidian, Semitic and Mongolian peoples who inhabit Persia. A Syrian of Asiatic birth and descent will not be entitled to become a naturalized citizen of the United States as being a free white person. Ex parte Shahid, D.C.Or., 6 F.2d 919, 921; Ex parte Dow, D.C.S.C., 211 F. 486, 487; In re En Sk Song, D.C.Cal., 271 F. 23. Nor a native-born Filipino. U. S. v. Javier, 22 F.2nd 879, 880, 57 App.D.C. 303. Nor a native of India who belonged to Hindu race. Kharaiti Ram Samras v. United States, C.C.A.Cal., 125 F.2nd 879, 881.
__________________
]
|

07-10-2008, 07:29 AM
|
 |
Unplugged
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mecca (ILLINOIS)
Posts: 106
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shoonra
This Moorish business is nonsense dreamed up about a century ago by an Afro-American conman who called himself (IIRC) "Noble Drew Ali". He started up a non-Christian church called the Moorish Science Temple. His followers identify themselves by adding "-Bey" to their last names and with the honorifics "Sheik" and even "Sheikess". Need I add that this church is black-only?
Their secret grimoire has a collection of do***ents that supposedly govern their lives: A "Zodiac Constitution", the "True Thirteenth Amendment" - which not only frees the slaves but gives them total tax exemption and enormous payouts, "Lincoln's Ethical Will" - a do***ent that has no real connection to Abraham Lincoln, and some other stuff. They're not even supposed to show this book to outsiders, although they have referred to it in frequent court pleadings.
They claim to be exempt from taxes, from driver's license laws (sound familiar?), and to have diplomatic immunity from arrest and from creditors. They have a very consistent losing streak.
Their church is still around but hardly as prominent as the splinter group that split off in the 1930s - Elijah Mohammed's Black Muslims.
|
moorish nationality hidden in movies
http://youtube.com/watch?v=CFt6dx6c4Qg
http://youtube.com/watch?v=5s9WWEWXZTA
http://youtube.com/watch?v=5yIz1JdJjj8
moorish empire
http://youtube.com/watch?v=zta-7WMmk8k
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ieTqlRL8028
ancient migration
http://youtube.com/watch?v=zqRablIPu_U
http://youtube.com/watch?v=RA6oZ0ZV668
__________________
]
|

07-10-2008, 07:56 AM
|
 |
Unplugged
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mecca (ILLINOIS)
Posts: 106
|
|
|
__________________
]
|

07-10-2008, 08:13 AM
|
 |
Unplugged
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 178
|
|
|
Unfortunately, I will have to agree with Shoonra and Lawdog on this one, it is totally absurd and nutty to claim that the moors did all these things... Also, anyone whose ever been to Morocco will see that the moors generally don't look black/negro or African American, they look more like Arabs or southern Europeans. The people making these claims are often "black supremacists", who are just as crazy as white, Asian, Jewish, Muslim, Aryan and other stupid "supremacists"... When people learn to seek the truth instead of support for their BS political agenda, this world will be a better place...
|

07-10-2008, 08:46 AM
|
 |
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 921
|
|
Quote:
IA wrote:
Unfortunately, I will have to agree with Shoonra and Lawdog on this one, it is totally absurd and nutty to claim that the moors did all these things... Also, anyone whose ever been to Morocco will see that the moors generally don't look black/negro or African American, they look more like Arabs or southern Europeans. The people making these claims are often "black supremacists", who are just as crazy as white, Asian, Jewish, Muslim, Aryan and other stupid "supremacists"... When people learn to seek the truth instead of support for their BS political agenda, this world will be a better place...
|
So called Morrocans of today are the Arab invaders. The "Americans" of today are not the Americans of 400 years ago. The same goes for the Egyptians.
As far as black/negro goes, show me a map where the nation of Negro is. The designation 'negro' was given to Moorish peoples and their cousins after the Vatican with aid of Portugal and Spain saw fit to wage war on the 'Saracens and heathens' by way of papal bulls (Dum Diversas and Romanus Pontifex) and commerce (chattel slavery).
The Moors were stripped of their nationality and given the designation negro which is Spanish for 'black'. Mulatto is Spanish for little mule. Anyone who would accept the designators of negro, black, or mulatto to define themselves is a fool. You never hear Caucasians refer to themselves as pale faces, do you? Having no nation, how could one participate in the Law of Nations?
Those so-called African-Americans who go by black or negro don't realize that they have lost their nationality, their roots, their culture, and their family. It would be their responsibility of those so-called AA to rediscover where their nationality lies.
Interestingly enough, L.B. Bork talks in-depth about nationality in his treatise, The Red Amendment.
If you look at many of the statutes and carvings of the Olmecs, who are considered one of the ancient civilizations of Native Americans, I could pull you an AA right now who would have facial features similar to those stone carvings. Wide nose and thick lips are typical features of Africans (Moors)... period.
I find it interesting that those features mentioned above are made fun of for entertainment and advertising in American for decades, but when those features turn up on statutes of ancient civilizations, then oh... it just can't be them....
There is a TON of ancient African history that is not taught in school or covered up. Schools keep focusing on the period when Moors were slaves, not the parts of them developing high civilization along with their cousins (so-called Africans) doing the same. I keep uncovering more Nubian history that isn't taught just as I keep uncovering new stuff in law that isn't exactly broadcast to the general public.
Psholtz,
I finally found a video that shows the family crests of European royal families with Moors in them. The video was titled, " The Decline of Moorish Power" by Jose Piementa Bey. Pt.5 will begin the pictures of the royal crests with Moors on them. Great vid too.
Regards,
netwrkranger
Last edited by netwrkranger : 07-10-2008 at 09:03 AM.
|

07-10-2008, 10:51 AM
|
 |
Unplugged
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mecca (ILLINOIS)
Posts: 106
|
|
|
__________________
]
|

07-10-2008, 10:57 AM
|
 |
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 921
|
|
|
Are you a Moor, KingC?
- netwrkranger
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:48 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
|
|