Moorish ancestry of America

[netwrkranger]

You know... now that I think about it. I think the Arabs are trying (and succeeding) at stealing the birthrights and land of the aborigines of Maures, Moors, Libya, Numidians, etc.

I'm convinced. I will need to do even more study. That is a great point.

Looks like "what is my nationality" is an extremely important question indeed.

Regards,
netwrkranger

[KingC]

Originally Posted by netwrkranger

You know... now that I think about it. I think the Arabs are trying (and succeeding) at stealing the birthrights and land of the aborigines of Maures, Moors, Libya, Numidians, etc.

I'm convinced. I will need to do even more study. That is a great point.

Looks like "what is my nationality" is an extremely important question indeed.

Regards,
netwrkranger

good info from dancingfromgenesis.worldpress

Home About Author James I. Nienhuis Books & DVDs Radio Broadcasts What Is This Blog About? Star Mapping Atlantean Formorians (Moors) of Morocco Settled Ice Age United Kingdom to Build Stonehenge and Newgrange Megalithic Observatories and Mine for Tin for Atlantis Bronze Production
Tin was the key but rare component for the production of Bronze in the ancient world, when the seafaring Canaanites, Greeks, Egyptians, and Minoans, were competing to explore for, and exploit, the relatively rare tin reserves of the world, to combine with the more abundant copper to make the far more durable bronze, for weapons, construction tools, and ornaments.

Canaanites inhabited Morocco and Libya during this time, during the Ice Age. They were great navigators, later known as the Phoenicians, their patriarchs were Sidon and his son Atlas, so they were Atlanteans, and the “Formoriacchi” (Men of Morocco) were the first inhabitants of modern-day Britain, “the Tin Islands,” as they were known to the Phoenicians, some of whose ancestors were the Formorians of ancient British and Irish lore, the first settlers there, during the Ice Age, the progeny of Canaan, a son of Ham.

The megalithic observatories of the U.K., Stonehenge and Newgrange, among others, were built to measure the movements of the stars and planets, for religious purposes, as well as, for navigational purposes, astrology for relgion, and astronomy to navigate the high seas. These are generally thought to have been built circa 2000 B.C., when the Formorians, the Men of Morocco, later known as the Moors, controlled the mines and shipping lanes of England.

The Romans expunged the Formorian names from British records around the time of Christ, and Saints Patrick and Augustine of the Roman Catholic church destroyed many volumes of astronomical records and histories from the ancient Formorian Brits, but the evidence for their astronomical expertise is acknowledged with the ruins of their megatlithic observatories, and British and Irish lore include ancestries going back to these first settlers there, the Formorians, the men of Morocco.

[farmer_giles_of_ham]

http://www.dinsdoc.com/goodell-1-1-23.htm


check the above for an interesting essay about the legality of slavery in the United States.

The conclusion of the author is that slavery never actually existed as a foundation in law- and this makes sense, ultimately there is no "general enslavement" decreed by law, rather it was just taken for granted that some people were slaves. It was a hybrid, artificial monster: slaves were both chattels yet also somehow held legally responsible as persons.

Also explains a lot about why "colored" slavery- it was easier to make this assumption on someone who is identifiable by birth (even though there were many free persons of color)

The whole issue was one of jurisdiction...which is especially moving when one realizes that a people who wake up to their own heritage and Gods Will stop being slaves at that instant.

That's why so much effort, then as now, goes into denying knowledge and truth. We are headed back to this condition of slavery, by our own ignorance.

The slaves of back then may not have realized that they were free...they would often agree that they were the property of a master and subjects of the slave laws. Probably those who wanted their freedom and were more self-aware were more likely to get or stay free overall. Its really about character and spirit.

Looks like we need another Moses...

[Montia El]

All Praises are Due to ALLAH!
The Lord of The Worlds!

Islam!

Nationality is the order of the day so said the Prophet Noble Drew Ali. What is your Nationality is the Most important question-no need for a man who is merely a visitor to question a king in his own home/house. According to all true and divine records there is no such thing as a negro, colored, black, African-American race or nation. The marks of slavery (negro, colored, black, etc) along with mental slavery is the only crap that the Moorish Nation needs to be redeemed from. Also how could a adjective (black) be mistaken for a nationality (Moorish, English, Mexican, etc) for all those "GREAT" thinkers out there who claim to have a command of the English language? As you will notice none of these doubters/haters stated what his nationality is for the record. I have an even better question for the forum-What law makes you a citizen in the United States of America? Hint: It is NOT the 14th Amendment.

Peace!
Sheik L.Love El

[farmer_giles_of_ham]

more info- "white person" really means "free person", and "colored" really means "colored with slavery".

see how arrogant and out-of-control things got right before the civil war...today there are new categories: "illegal alien", "security threat","enemy combatant", "runaway child" etc

Whites are enslaved. Several known instances have occurred already of the successful kidnapping of free whites, without a drop of negro or Indian blood in their veins! And the process of intermixture of the races is now so far advanced, and is so rapidly going forward, that a “perfectly white complexion, light blue eyes, and flaxen hair,” are scarcely a presumptive evidence of freedom. Persons thus described are advertised as runaway slaves; are liable to be pursued with muskets and bloodhounds, shot, maimed, captured, brought before United States Marshals, sworn to be slaves, given up and sent to the rice and cotton and sugar plantations of the South, without trial by jury, and by a “summary” process that precludes any thing deserving the name of an investigation. Sometimes, under a peremptory refusal to wait a few hours for witnesses. Yet the people imagine themselves free, and their liberties secure under this enactment, (the Fugitive Slave Bill of 1850,) which, while it makes no distinction of color, forbids them, under pains and penalties, to “harbor” and “entertain” each other when thus pursued! By the estimate of Henry Clay, (speech in Senate, 1839,) one hundred and fifty years will obliterate the distinctions of race and color in this country, but without abolishing slavery! Reposing, as it does, by his showing, upon the “rights of property,” and “sanctified and sanctioned” already “by two centuries of legislation,” its conservators look for its perpetuity, as they do for the perpetuity of property in “brood mares and their increase.” For “that is property which the law declares to be property.” The blacks will not be the slaves of the whites, but the poorer will be the slaves of the wealthier; and the most they can hope for is that, perhaps, they will be kept “fat and sleek!” Their idolized statesmen, their venerated religious teachers, can promise them nothing better. Nor do they seem to desire it! The “innocent legal relation” of slave ownership conducts us to this result, and it leaves us here.

In our chapter concerning “Fugitives from Slavery,” it was shown that the State of Maryland, at an early date, (1715,) enacted laws by which all persons, irrespective of color, were forbidden to travel out of their own county without an official pass; and “if apprehended, not being sufficiently known, nor able to give a good account of themselves,” the magistrates might deal with them as with runaways, and sell them temporarily, to pay their fines. Our Fugitive Slave Bill of 1850, in like manner, knows nothing of color; and its provisions are more stringent and humiliating than the old law of Maryland!

The reader is referred to Jay’s View, pp. 83-87, for a number of advertisements of runaway slaves, in which they are described as being white.

As for example—

“$100 REWARD.—The above reward will be paid for the apprehension of my man William. He is a very bright mulatto, straight yellowish hair. I have no doubt he will change his name, and try to pass himself for a white man, which he may be able to do, unless to a close observer.—T. S. PITCHARD.”

“$100 REWARD.—Ran away from James Hyhart, Paris, Ky., &c., the mulatto boy Norton, &c. Would be taken for a white boy, if not closely examined. His hair is black and straight, &c.”—New-Orleans Free American, 11th Aug. 1836.

Anderson Bowles advertises, in the Richmond Whig, 6th Jan. 1836, his “negro!” who has “straight hairand is “nearly white;” so that “a stranger” would suppose there was “no African blood in him.” “He was with my boy **** a short time since at Norfolk, and offered to sell him, but escaped, under pretense of being a WHITE MAN.”

In the Newbern Spectator, 13th March, 1837, John T. Lane advertises “William, about 19 years old, quite white, and would not readily be taken for a slave.”

Edwin Peck, Mobile, April 22, 1837, offers $100 reward for a slave named Sam, “light sandy hair, blue eyes, ruddy complexion; is so white as very easily to pass for a white man.”

In the New-Orleans Bee of June 22, 1831, P. Balie advertises as a runaway, “Maria, with a clear white complexion.”

“Mr. Paxton, a Virginia writer, tells us in his work on Slavery, that ‘the best blood of Virginia runs in the veins of slaves.’” (Jay’s View, p. 85.)

“Dr. Torrey, in his work on Domestic Slavery in the United States, p. 14,” relates, that “not far from Fredericktown there was a slave estate, on which there were several white females, of as fair and elegant appearance as white ladies in general, held in legal bondage as slaves.” (Ib., pp. 85-6.)

“White lady fugitives” have been hunted in the State of New-York, and have taken refuge in Canada. (Vide Utica “Friend of Man,” and the Syracuse papers.)

“A Missouri paper, reporting the trial of a slave boy, says, ‘All the physiological marks of distinction which characterize the African descent had disappeared.’” (Jay’s View, p. 86.)

Mr. Miles, in his Register, tells us that John C. Calhoun related a similar instance. (Ib., pp. 86-7.)

“Mary Gillmore, of Philadelphia, claimed as a runaway slave in 1835, was proved to be the child of Irish parents, and had not a single drop of African blood in her veins.” (Ib., p. 86.)