Misc. Discussion Post anything here that does not fit elsewhere..


Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > General Discussion > Misc. Discussion
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 12-02-2004, 05:01 AM
Mike
 
Posts: n/a
Definition

Anyone have the legal definition of "shall".

Thank you
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-02-2004, 06:02 AM
truth
 
Posts: n/a
Black's 4th Definition of "Shall"

Shall [from Black's 4th]:

"As used in statutes, contracts, or the like, this word is generally imperative or mandatory.

BUT IT MAY be construed as merely permissive or directory, (as equivalent to "may,") to carry out the legislative intention and in cases where no right or benefit to any one depends on its being taken in the imperative sense, and where no public or private right is impaired by its interpretation in the other sense.

Although the word usually denotes an obligation, it also implies an element of futurity."
[Emphasis in all-caps mine]

If, by the way, this inconsistency frustrates you, go to page 5 on the citizenship/jurisdiction cites thread and read my response to "Does it matter what they say?".

Sincerely,
truth
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-02-2004, 09:43 AM
Mike
 
Posts: n/a
Definition of "Shall"

Thank you for the response.

As a matter of fact the word is used in "The person preparing a report...shall maintain, for at least 3 years, copies of all examination reports, ..."


How would you say it's used in this sense?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-02-2004, 10:40 AM
truth
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Definition of Shall

Greetings Mike,

What administrative agency are you dealing with, or maybe I should ask more precisely, what is this phraseology from, or in reference to?

The reason I ask is because it matters whether it's purpose is designed to carry out a legislative intention where no right or benefit depends on its being taken in the mandatory sense, and where no public or private right is impaired by its interpretation in the other sense.

It would make a difference if the word is being imposed upon a public official, directing them to do some specific act, as opposed to an everyday citizen. As far as citizens, "voluntary compliance" is a preferred expression that is not widely publicized.

If you want my private opinion, the whole damn thing is voluntary, regardless of their deceptive legalese. But, such an assertion would have little merit in their administrative courts.

Sincerely,
truth
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-02-2004, 11:29 AM
Jerseee's Avatar
Jerseee Jerseee is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,837
Yup.

ponder this: "shall" v. "must"
__________________
"FOR AS HE THINKETH IN HIS HEART, SO IS HE."
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gun Control Cites & Code suijuris Court 15 02-26-2005 03:13 PM
Case Law Definition of Natural Person? HenryBowman Court 12 02-07-2005 03:15 PM
Is there only one definition for "Income"? JWR Misc. Discussion 4 02-04-2005 06:00 PM
From The Archives SKYGZR Taxation 0 07-10-2004 02:20 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:21 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2008 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer