Legal Research Help Needed!!!

Cute Chick,

How presumptive and egomaniacal of you to imply that I do not understand the "theories and logic behind all this." If I am wrong somewhere in my post, please point it out to me or state what your disagreement is. But do not give me an irrelevant lecture of your experience and tell me to go get an attorney based on your imagination of who I am, what I know, or what my experience is. Example: You're the one who has never heard of the common count of "account stated" even though you claim to have several years of experience in contractual litigation. Yet I did not and do not presume your understanding of the law is substandard. I actually think you are quite the intelligent "cute chick." However, since you imply that you do understand all the "theories and logic behind this," I look forward to seeing your documented success story of proving fraud-in-the-inducement against a CCC.

-squirrels

[weishaupt1776]

I tell ya, I was a bit disappointed to read someone on this forum (knowing the overall climate of it) suggest that someone get an attorn(look it up)-ey from the British Accredidation Regency to RE-present them.

Originally Posted by squirrels

Cute Chick,

How presumptive and egomaniacal of you to imply that I do not understand the "theories and logic behind all this." If I am wrong somewhere in my post, please point it out to me or state what your disagreement is. But do not give me an irrelevant lecture of your experience and tell me to go get an attorney based on your imagination of who I am, what I know, or what my experience is. Example: You're the one who has never heard of the common count of "account stated" even though you claim to have several years of experience in contractual litigation. Yet I did not and do not presume your understanding of the law is substandard. I actually think you are quite the intelligent "cute chick." However, since you imply that you do understand all the "theories and logic behind this," I look forward to seeing your documented success story of proving fraud-in-the-inducement against a CCC.

-squirrels

Squirrels I'm sorry if I offended you in any way. I am not insulting your intelligence on this issue. However, all I am saying is that there's just too much for me to explain here on this board. I'll need at least 50 pages to address all of your questions and issues presented.

And in reference to that *Account Stated* argument, I never said that I am an expert in banking law, hence the reason why I'm here. I also never said that all lawyers and judges are honorable nor did I say that some lawyers are not capable of litigating ficticious claims. It is clear that most courts have a tendency to side with the banks in these disputes and it is also clear that banks will do anything and everything to protect their interests, even if it involves confusing the issues and fabricating legal claims . . . . . Justice is blind and anything is possible in these banking suits . . . .

Best.

Cute Chick,

As Winston says, "Shed your vanity." I was never looking for an answer. I'm looking for someone who can show me something, and it takes only a paragraph or two to do so, not 50 pages of crap.

-squirrels

Originally Posted by squirrels

Cute Chick,

As Winston says, "Shed your vanity." I was never looking for an answer. I'm looking for someone who can show me something, and it takes only a paragraph or two to do so, not 50 pages of crap.

-squirrels

Squirrels I DID make an attempt to *show you something* on the first page of this thread but I guess my replies were not to your satisfaction . . . . . Good luck.