Good for a laugh

[suijuris]

Was googling around a bit today checking out sites that are linking to suijuris.net, and saw another thread had been started at the quatloos(ers) site that linked here.

When I followed the link, it became apparent that the thread was no longer stored on their server. So I used google's cache to view it instead, and you can do the same at the link below:

__Quatloosers Cached Page Link__

Anyone else find it interesting that those naysayers would spend so much time reading the multitudes of posts in these forums, as well as create two pages of discussion on the matter?

It did not stop there - it appears some went so far as to relay the personal accounts of several of the SJ members and then attempted to discredit the entire SJ community, including the moderaters, based on their opinions (read: no first hand knowledge)

Then comes the funny part. After going to all that trouble, they must have sensed that it was not working out as planned, and pulled the plug, rather than risking more folks learning about this site.

ROTFLMAO

[iamfreeru2]

SJ,

That is too funny. That guy at Quatloos is crazy if he thinks he's going to stop the truth from getting out. Talk about mistatements and lies. That was great and I am still laughing. HAhahahahah!!!!!

[suijuris]

My favorite character was "the captian" saying we discuss how to find 70 virgins of whatever sex we prefer.

Hmmm, a pervert AND a liar.

[squirrel]

They have a name for those kind of people dont they ?
The kind that cant think for themselfs.
Is'nt it sheople, or is cattle ?

I'll think maybe the reason they stopped badmouthing us here is because they ACTUALLY took the time to research what is was we were talking about and found out it was all TRUE !

there is a saying, dont put your foot in your mouth.

One thing that upsets me is when someone tells me I dont know what I'm talking about and that I'm crazy or paranoid but refuse to look at the FACTS themselfs !!!!!

[sadie]

Interesting how anyone who reads the truth of what is really going on has the most intelligent responses. Did you see how they clearly and concisely refute it with facts and logic? - duh it's "gibberish"

Well I guess that must be true as it is the same clear and intelligent response used by the judge in the Funk cases - only he expanded by saying "gibberish and gobbledygook"

Maybe, we could benefit from this approach. Instead of demanding VOD as is spelled out in the FDCPA, FCRA, FCBA, common law and common (very rare) sense (why would anyone want to pay a debt if they don't owe it?), we just respond to the collection notice that it is mere "gibberish and gobbledygook" and let them figure it out.

It seems this is the language level they can understand.