Misc. Discussion Post anything here that does not fit elsewhere..


Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > General Discussion > Misc. Discussion
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #111  
Old 09-27-2007, 07:53 AM
mrg's Avatar
mrg mrg is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois Republic
Posts: 3,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by weishaupt1776
cool, I found the link
http://www.hawkscafe.com/107.html

It's in a USDC in North Dakota

Gonna be interesting to see the black robes tap dance 7 play hot potato w/this one fer sher

Sounds like it might well be heading for the "nut case" "frivolous" bin that the treasonous BAR cowards keep handy for such occasions.

Might be too late to kill these guys though.

Last edited by mrg : 09-27-2007 at 08:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 09-27-2007, 08:27 AM
weishaupt1776's Avatar
weishaupt1776 weishaupt1776 is offline
The Outta Commissiona
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Republic
Posts: 5,390
It is easy for them to say that they have no standing to sue & still be correct

However, he can go in as a Private Atty Gen & prosecute the case EX REL in the name of the People if he can prove that the defendants pose a credible threat to the public at large

I emailed the dude and told him about that

hopefully he is not some puffed up know it all that will ignore my suggestion
__________________
THE DOWNLOADS SECTION IS BROKEN & WILL NEVER BE FIXED, SO STOP BUGGING ME !

www.pacinlaw.org ~ www.pacgroups.us
Multi multa, non omnia novit = Many men know many things, no one knows everything.
The De jure Political Group: www.statenationals.net
Do you have concerns about America? www.redamendment.net
Is the government acting in your interest? www.notmygovernment.us
Have you been Deprogrammed? www.deprogram.us


DOWNLOAD THIS COURSE NOW !!

Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 09-27-2007, 09:25 AM
drewenterprises drewenterprises is offline
Waking Up
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 14
how about this case?

Quote:
McConnell v. Boeing Company et al
Plaintiff:
Field McConnell
Defendant:
Boeing Company and Airline Pilots Association

Case Number:
3:2007cv00024
Filed:
February 27, 2007

Court:
North Dakota District Court
Office:
Southeastern Office [ Court Info ]
County:
XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:
Judge Ralph R. Erickson
Referring Judge:
Magistrate Judge Karen K. Klein

Nature of Suit:
Other Statutes - Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Cause:
18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jurisdiction:
Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Amount Demanded:
$4,500,000.00
http://dockets.justia.com/docket/cou...case_id-17094/
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 09-27-2007, 09:43 AM
mrg's Avatar
mrg mrg is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois Republic
Posts: 3,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by weishaupt1776
It is easy for them to say that they have no standing to sue & still be correct

However, he can go in as a Private Atty Gen & prosecute the case EX REL in the name of the People if he can prove that the defendants pose a credible threat to the public at large

I emailed the dude and told him about that

hopefully he is not some puffed up know it all that will ignore my suggestion

Just curious, how would they have no standing to sue.

From what I read these guys do not seem puffed up, but you can only hope not.
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 09-27-2007, 09:53 AM
weishaupt1776's Avatar
weishaupt1776 weishaupt1776 is offline
The Outta Commissiona
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Republic
Posts: 5,390
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrg
Just curious, how would they have no standing to sue.

From what I read these guys do not seem puffed up, but you can only hope not.

Well, because they are not really showing "distinct & palpable" injuries suffered personally and how 9/11 was a proximate cause "fairly traceable" to any alleged damages they themselves suffered

I get the impression that they are doing a wrongful death case On behalf of a bunch of people

This is where taking the role of prosecutor as a Private Attorney General would be more appropriate

Prosecute them for RICO
__________________
THE DOWNLOADS SECTION IS BROKEN & WILL NEVER BE FIXED, SO STOP BUGGING ME !

www.pacinlaw.org ~ www.pacgroups.us
Multi multa, non omnia novit = Many men know many things, no one knows everything.
The De jure Political Group: www.statenationals.net
Do you have concerns about America? www.redamendment.net
Is the government acting in your interest? www.notmygovernment.us
Have you been Deprogrammed? www.deprogram.us


DOWNLOAD THIS COURSE NOW !!

Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 09-27-2007, 09:56 AM
mrg's Avatar
mrg mrg is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois Republic
Posts: 3,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by drewenterprises

Looks OK.

The first one you posted looked awesome.

I hope he can kick some @$$.

Unfortunately We the People (hahaha) do not have FREE ACCESS to OUR (hahaha) "courts," and must bribe someone (PACER) for access to PUBLIC RECORD, so I was prohibitted from accessing:

* Search for Party Aliases
* Associated Cases
* Attorneys
* Case File Location
* Case Summary
* Docket Report
* History/Documents
* Parties
* Related Transactions
* Check Status

"Thank you"*** UNCLE SAM!


*** aka "FU"
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 09-27-2007, 12:56 PM
Shoonra Shoonra is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,697
A wrongful death suit would be available only to the next-of-kin or the estate of the decedent. There is already a sort of class action suit for wrongful death brought by the next-of-kin of about two dozen people who were killed aboard hijacked planes or in the WTC.

Criminal prosecutions brought pro se have seldom succeeded (I have not heard of even one success). The RICO law allows for prosecution for "a pattern of racketeering activity"; it's a complicated law and thick books have been published about it. I am not at all optimistic about amateurs bringing, without very good lawyers, a RICO action against a number of VIPs, each of whom can be expected to have his own "dream team".
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 10-05-2007, 08:10 PM
drewenterprises drewenterprises is offline
Waking Up
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 14
converting into a Qui Tam suit?

From http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hawksc...272?threaded=1

Quote:
Request US Attorney help to convert "HawksCAFE v. Global
Guardians" in to Qui Tam suit for U.S. re Boeing Company
false claims during 'decoy-and-drone' maneuvers of 9/11 war game.

From: Field McConnell
9223 50th Ave S
Glyndon MN 56547

To: Drew Wrigley, US Attorney, North Dakota
655 1st Ave N, Suite 250
Fargo ND 58102

2 October, 2007

Dear Attorney Wrigley;

I, Field McConnell, request your assistance in converting "HawksCAFE v.
Global Guardians" into a Qui Tam suit for benefit of United States of
America.

By 12-10-06 I had completed an analysis of the multiple and ongoing violations of the False Claims Act in respect of The Boeing Company's participation in the 'decoy-and-drone' maneuvers executed by Boeing passenger aircraft during the Amalgam Virgo (June 1-2) and Global Guardian (9/11) war games of 2001.

By 2001, John Shalikashvili and his fellow Boeing directors and their partners, including French companies Total and Thales and the Chinese People's Liberation Army, had modified and weaponized over 120 Boeing passenger planes and flight boxes with the QRS11 triaxial missile gyrcoscope.

By 2001, whether during a war game or a regular commuter flight, a modified Boeing plane could be electronically hijacked and flown as though it had been physically hijacked.

On 9/11, Boeing directors and customers and corrupt union officials in the FAA, falsely claimed to the United States that a number of planes had been physically hijacked.

On 9/11, the United States' defenders and/or interceptors responded to the decoy claims but were misdirected by the Boeing and FAA air traffic controllers away from what were about to become 'droned' aircraft.

At about 3 minutes out of target, modified planes were switched to drone mode and flew under the control of the QRS11 missile gyroscopes into a number of US command centers, killing nearly 3,000 targeted victims.

"July 11, 2007 ... Ex-Boeing employee charged with theft of data By DAN RICHMAN P-I REPORTER .. According to charging documents, Gerald Eastman, 45, a former quality-assurance inspector working in Tukwila, took more than 320,000 pages of confidential Boeing documents, storing them on his home computer. The information allegedly was taken during 12 periods, some as short as one day, between Sept. 24, 2004, and April 9, 2006 .. Of the charges against him, Eastman said, "I'm a whistleblower. I was trying to get crimes at Boeing, and the people at the FAA facilitating those crimes, brought to justice .. The case summary said articles using information credited to "internal Boeing documents" began appearing in The Seattle Times in 2003. Eastman's alleged activities became known when an anonymous e-mail was sent April 12, 2006, to Rick Stephens, Boeing's senior vice president for human resources .... they also accused him of leaking documents resulting in Gates' stories about the QRS-11, a gyro microchip that was the basis for fines levied against Boeing for unlicensed foreign sales of commercial airplanes with equipment that had military applications .. Eastman's Web site, details his attempts to "reform ... endemic and continuing Boeing and FAA corruption." http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/busine...charges11.html

On 12-10-06 I sent a written alert to an airline company, ALPA
[air line pilots association ], ADM Tim Keating of Northern Command
and others identifying a deployed threat on Boeing aircraft that
was extremely urgent.

12-10-06 The airline company told me to retract my written statement, ALPA told me this was above their level and ADM Keating never responded

1-1-07 Adam Air 574 is vaporized consistent with warning.

1-18-07 The airline company advises me of a non-routine physical
to be administered by an MD unqualified to examine pilots.

1-31-07 I brief ALPA Attorney Rob Plunkett and "xyz airline" ALPA
safety representative "John Doe" on Boeing threats.

1-31-07 I pass non routine physical from doctor not qualified to determine my suitability for flying duties

2-13-07 I pass same information on to Robert Swan Mueller, Director of FBI and Boeing CEO McNerney.

2-27-07 Having heard nothing at all from Boeing or FBI I file lawsuit
"McConnell v. ALPA and Boeing" in US District Court, ND
3-5-07 In a front page article in the Fargo Forum ALPA's senior lawyer
senior engineer both say "...it's an insane complaint ...it sound like
he's [ Field McConnell ] a troubled guy".

3-13-07 In a front page article in the Fargo Forum "both Boeing and ALPA
deny any safety issues with the planes".


3-13-07 In a Fed Ex letter with electronic tracking "xyz airlines" advises
me that due to my failure to appear for a psychiatric exam with
Dr. Elliott in Los Angeles on 1,2 March 07 I was removed from
pay status 2 March, 2007. Unfortunately for the airline, they had
never advised me of the appointment. Therefore, the airline is
guilty of several infractions including "constructive discharge".

3-14-07 I retired from "xyz airline" as numerous credible pilots and attorneys from United, Continental and Northwest Airlines pointed out that I was being discredited to prevent my expert witness in court.

4-4-07 I pass a routine FAA 1st Class Medical exam by AME Dr. David Glatt, MD

5-1-07 After much more information comes to myself and HawksCAFE, I filed "HawksCAFE v. Global Guardians" on 1 May, 2007.

5-31-07 An Indian Airline solicits my services to captain widebody AirBus 330, 340, or 380 jets between US and India based on 23,000 hours of safety, AirBus captain experience and widebody captain experience. The required documents are sent to India to qualify for duty there.

9-13-07 I pass a 3rd physical, again with AME qualified Dr. David Glatt.

9-22-07 I complete training with a successful check ride and am granted a type rating on A330 which will enhance chance of flying job in India.

10-2-07 I extend offer to US DOJ, with copies to DHS and FBI and "the world" via internet posting, to appear as a witness for the US if USDOJ wishes to convert MayDay filing into a Qui Tam False Claim case for benefit of USA.

10-15-07 DVD is released demonstrating truth of how 9-11 was planned as a "live mass snuff film"; to quote Dr. Thomas Barnett former director of the US Naval War College.
Please refer to supporting whistleblowers below.



Sincerely yours,


Captain Field McConnell
www.hawkscafe.com
www.captainsherlock.com
218 329 2993
Any comments?
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 10-08-2007, 11:04 AM
weishaupt1776's Avatar
weishaupt1776 weishaupt1776 is offline
The Outta Commissiona
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Republic
Posts: 5,390
Quote:
Originally Posted by drewenterprises

Wow !! A worldwide "snuff Film" ??

I'd like to get the dudes DVD if he can really prove that as a motive (although motive is not necessary to prove in criminal law)
__________________
THE DOWNLOADS SECTION IS BROKEN & WILL NEVER BE FIXED, SO STOP BUGGING ME !

www.pacinlaw.org ~ www.pacgroups.us
Multi multa, non omnia novit = Many men know many things, no one knows everything.
The De jure Political Group: www.statenationals.net
Do you have concerns about America? www.redamendment.net
Is the government acting in your interest? www.notmygovernment.us
Have you been Deprogrammed? www.deprogram.us


DOWNLOAD THIS COURSE NOW !!

Reply With Quote
  #120  
Old 10-08-2007, 05:15 PM
rottweiler's Avatar
rottweiler rottweiler is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: judicial district of tens: Milwaukee the county: Wisconsin the land
Posts: 2,613
I wonder if McConnell could find a surviving victim of the 9/11 attack and get LB Bork or somebody to help the guy do a cancellatura so the survivor could sue Boeing under the Alien Tort Claims Act. Unfortunately the survivor might not survive it.


Quote:
Originally Posted by weishaupt1776
Wow !! A worldwide "snuff Film" ??

I'd like to get the dudes DVD if he can really prove that as a motive (although motive is not necessary to prove in criminal law)
__________________
United States never held any municipal sovereignty, jurisdiction, or right of soil in Alabama or any of the new states which were formed ... The United States has no Constitutional capacity to exercise municipal jurisdiction, sovereignty or eminent domain, within the limits of a state or elsewhere, except in the cases in which it is expressly granted ...
[Pollard v. Hagan, 44 U.S. 212 (1845)]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
bad songs stuck in your head weishaupt1776 Entertainment & Hobbies 55 02-21-2008 03:07 PM
Evidence of Law Akira Court 29 02-15-2006 06:35 PM
Lawsuit Basics-Word Study weishaupt1776 Court 31 12-27-2005 02:57 PM
Anyone have Lexis? HenryBowman Misc. Discussion 34 10-21-2004 10:14 AM
A Brief Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge KaosTheory Religion 10 08-29-2004 01:36 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:10 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2008 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer