More 911 Evidence of Inside Job

[Logan]

I know most of us realize that the World Trade Center attacks were orchestrated by our government, but this is some more incredible evidence to put in the light and help further ask why George W. Bush has refused to investigate the largest frontal assault on our soil since Pearl Harbor.


http://www.lewisnews.com/article.asp?ID=106623

[weishaupt1776]

Originally Posted by Logan

orchestrated by our government

I disagree, Logan.

The WTC attacks were orchestrated by THEIR government

[Logan]

Hey weis,
Touche', I stand corrected. THEIR government. Thanks for clarification.

[iamfreeru2]

Very informative article. Thanks for posting.

[DeJure]

Got to sit down and give it a good glance over.
Pretty good common sense stuff

[BOBT12]

I found this information to be very interesting, see for yourself:

Originally posted by rattler14

First off, I must mention that one cannot let emotions get the best of them when thinking about these things. You must always be able to discern from irrefutable facts, facts that make logical sense but cannot be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt, and speculation. The problem with the 9/11 truth movement is that everyone spouts off all these "facts" when some of them are not. Opposition then takes these weak arguments and tries to belittle the entire argument because of that. Just like arguing about the income tax, you have to make sure you're well versed and not pushing handy waving arguments.

Onward with the links
As stated, Morgan Reynolds created a very powerful overview just a few months ago
http://www.lewrockwell.com/reynolds/reynolds12.html

In terms of research groups, these are probably the best and free of misinformation
http://911research.wtc7.net/
http://physics911.net/
http://team8plus.org/news.php (but this last one pushes the conjecture on certain things.)

I state again. Do not blindly accept what you read. Question the questioners as well and you'll understand that most of their arguments are sound and blow the government's story so full of holes that you might as well call it "the swiss cheese theory"

By far, the best video you can get that you can show to doubters/newbies is "loose change". A free 20 minute preview can be seen here
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles...demolition.htm

NOTE. The hosting website, prison planet, while usually factual and full of good information, is generally a "the sky might be falling" type of website. So yes, things are bad and scary, but it's not that bad... yet.

For someone who wants the gory details and is willing to sacrifice a little bit in terms of production quality, Painful Deceptions by Eric Hufschmid is a far more detailed DVD. It's also quite dry. But the facts are all there and it basically shows there is no way this is possible

For the mother of all questions/linked lists... try here
http://whatreallyhappened.com/9-11BasicQuestions

Lastly, here's my personal plug for an article I wrote.
http://hammeroftruth.com/2005/09/10/...-wont-address/


These movements of government corruption can work together to fight a common foe, much like the givemeliberty.org organization does. Be it income taxes, the federal reserve fraud, waco, 9/11, the UN, whatever... we are all fighting the globalists that want to take this country down.

spread the facts, not conjecture, and we'll win this in time.

cheers

Here is more:

For further inspiration... from 2 days ago

http://wingtv.net/thornarticles/paulisaac.html

and

Finally, the broadcast in which they describe how their information was received at ground zero 2 days ago (the 4th anniversary of 9/11)
http://wingtv.net/todaysshow/091205.rm

powerful stuff folks

http://famguardian.org/forums/index....=15&#entry1730

[BOBT12]

Here is something that I picked up on the news this recently:

[...]Atah was identified as a terrorist in 1999. Atah was the mastermine of the attack. The employee [Weldon [?]] expected to name the the person at the Pentagon who order him to destroy the material [regarding the hijackers]. Weldon claims Atah, and three other hijackers, were identified in 1999 by a classified millatary intelligence until know as "Able Danger"[?] which determined that they could be members of an Al-Qaida cell.

Ed Donahue, Washington.

KYW News Radio
9/16/2005 7:39 a.m. EST

I believe that Weldon is scheduled to testify at some hearing next week, regarding the 9/11/2001 issue.

The above story seems to support the fact the government officials in high places are involved in a conspiracy connected to the events around 9/11/2001.

This may add to the body of evidence, which suggest agents of the government contacted Osama Bin Ladan, in a hospital, several months prior to 9/11 in order to, apparently, plan the whole event. Osama was wanted in connection to other, so-called, terrorist events at the time. Why was Osama not arrested at the time? Why didn't the U.S. capture Osama anyway, after two wars in his name (War on Terror)?

The hijacker's may have worked on their own. Or they were in on the scheme. Either way, the govenment seems to have known what was about to happen, and did nothing to stop it. In fact aided by derailing the investigation of key players. Of course this means that government was interested in making sure that the event took place without any hinderance. Even to the point of stopping an ongoing investigation!

I think this will be news to some people in the general public. Regardless, I think that it will add to the growing body of evidence that indicates 9/11/2001 was assisted, or executed, by the federal government. Additionally, it was likely planned at a high very high level within the government.

Any formal hearing(s) on the matter, in my view, will give credence to all research on this topic. This may bring these 9/11 issues to the public's attention in a way that we have not seen since the, deceptive, 911 Commission Report was released.

[Logan]

I just received this in my email. I definitely will support any cause of action that reinvestigates the multitude of inconsistances in the "Official 911 report".

http://www.reopen911.org

Logan

[BOBT12]

Originally Posted by Logan

I just received this in my email. I definitely will support any cause of action that reinvestigates the multitude of inconsistances in the "Official 911 report".

http://www.reopen911.org

Logan

Thanks for your reply.

Who really died in the plane crashes?

Here is another good link:

http://wingtv.net/thornarticles/911passengerlist.html

[rottweiler]

Airlines to Test Cell-Phone Service

By BRADLEY S. KLAPPER
Associated Press Writer

GENEVA (AP) -- Two European airlines will allow passengers late next year to use their own cell phones on commercial flights within western Europe, a Geneva-based technology firm said Tuesday.

TAP Air Portugal and British carrier bmi both have agreed to introduce OnAir's voice and text service for cell phones in separate three-month trial runs, OnAir Chief Executive George Cooper said.

The planes - which will be the first to allow passengers to make and receive calls with their own cell phones while onboard - will give OnAir the chance to assess its service ahead of its general release in 2007 for everywhere in the world but North America, he said.

"With both airlines, initially there will be a couple of airplanes - two or three airplanes - equipped with this system," Cooper told The Associated Press from Germany. "During that three months, we'll all be evaluating how it's going, what the usage is, how we handle the crew issues and so on."

OnAir's system will be used by TAP on its Airbus 321 model and by bmi on its Airbus 320s, both single-aisle planes primarily used for flights within western Europe.

Users of mobile phones and other handheld wireless devices with roaming capability will be able to make and receive calls using a base station within the airplane. They will be allowed to turn their phones on after the plane reaches 10,000 feet, when other electronic devices such as portable music players and laptops are permitted, Cooper said.

"This trial will guide us on usage patterns and some of the social issues in using mobile phones on aircraft," said bmi Chief Executive Nigel Turner. "It will also help us to confirm the business case for rolling the service out across the remainder of the fleet."

Mobile phones are banned on existing aircraft for fear that they might interfere with a plane's navigation system as they attempt to log on to terrestrial networks.

OnAir's mobile communications system is based within the plane, which it says ensures that cell phones and other devices operate at lower transmission power and thus avoid affecting avionics. The company hopes to clear all regulatory hurdles for air traffic in Europe and the rest of the world, except the United States, at some point next year. Approval in the U.S. is expected to take longer, Cooper said.

The technology should "add greatly to the quality of the time that our customers spend flying with us," said TAP Chief Executive Fernando Pinto. "We believe that business passengers flying within Europe will very much welcome this new capability."

OnAir - a joint venture of Airbus and Netherlands-based technology company SITA Information Networking Computing - is aiming to sell its services to other airlines, which could then use the technology in other plane models.

But the regulatory process in the United States will probably take longer, pushing back OnAir's potential release date in North America, Cooper said.

"The FAA and the FCC take a different approach from Europe and the rest of the world," he explained. "In the short-term, we are not likely to be a direct player in the U.S. domestic market."

Cooper said the surcharge for mobile phone use will be competitive with international roaming rates, at about $2.30-$2.50 per minute. A text message should cost about 50 cents to send or receive.

Airline bmi, a subsidiary of British Midland PLC, flies primarily to destinations in Britain and western Europe and is London Heathrow Airport's second-largest flight operator.

TAP, Portugal's state-owned airline, flies to 43 destinations in 25 countries.

Cooper made the announcement in conjunction with the annual World Airline Entertainment Association Conference, which opened Tuesday in Hamburg, Germany.

© 2005 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Learn more about our Privacy Policy.